Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dissension or consensus? Management and Business Research in Latin America and the Caribbean

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.09471 v1 pith:DN5BSJW4 submitted 2021-04-19 cs.DL cs.SIecon.GNq-fin.EC

Julian D. Cortes This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.DLcs.SIecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords dissensionamericabridgesbusinesscaribbeanconsensusintellectuallatin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This study presents longitudinal evidence on the dissension of Management and Business Research (MBR) in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). It looks after intellectual bridges linking clusters among such dissension. It was implemented a coword network analysis to a sample of 12,000+ articles published by authors from LAC during 1998-2017. Structural network scores showed an increasing number of keywords and mean degree but decreasing modularity and density. The intellectual bridges were those of the cluster formed by disciplines/fields that tend toward consensus (e.g., mathematical models) and not by core MBR subjects (e.g., strategic planning).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools