Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Compatibility of Partitions with Trees, Hierarchies, and Split Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.14146 v2 pith:Z7XSMB72 submitted 2021-04-29 cs.DM math.CO

classification cs.DMmath.CO
keywords mathcalcompatiblewhetherpartitionpartitionssplitsystemstrees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The question whether a partition $\mathcal{P}$ and a hierarchy $\mathcal{H}$ or a tree-like split system $\mathfrak{S}$ are compatible naturally arises in a wide range of classification problems. In the setting of phylogenetic trees, one asks whether the sets of $\mathcal{P}$coincide with leaf sets of connected components obtained by deleting some edges from the tree $T$ that represents $\mathcal{H}$ or $\mathfrak{S}$, respectively. More generally, we ask whether a refinement $T^*$ of $T$ exists such that $T^*$ and $\mathcal{P}$ are compatible in this sense. The latter is closely related to the question as to whether there exists a tree at all that is compatible with $\mathcal{P}$. We report several characterizations for (refinements of) hierarchies and split systems that are compatible with (systems of) partitions. In addition, we provide a linear-time algorithm to check whether refinements of trees and a given partition are compatible. The latter problem becomes NP-complete but fixed-parameter tractable if a system of partitions is considered instead of a single partition. In this context, we also explore the close relationship of the concept of compatibility and so-called Fitch maps.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools