Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dynamics of binary black holes in low-mass young star clusters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.01669 v1 pith:CYIRJRIU submitted 2021-05-04 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords starclustersmasslow-massmassiveodotyoungbbhs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Young star clusters are dynamically active stellar systems and are a common birthplace for massive stars. Low-mass star clusters ($\sim{}300-10^3$ M$_\odot$) are more numerous than massive systems and are characterized by a two-body relaxation time scale of a few Myr: the most massive stars sink to the cluster core and dynamically interact with each other even before they give birth to compact objects. Here, we explore the properties of black holes (BHs) and binary black holes (BBHs) formed in low-mass young star clusters, by means of a suite of $10^5$ direct $N$-body simulations with a high original binary fraction (100 % for stars with mass $>5$ M$_\odot$). Most BHs are ejected in the first $\sim{}20$ Myr by dynamical interactions. Dynamical exchanges are the main formation channel of BBHs, accounting for $\sim{}40-80$ % of all the systems. Most BBH mergers in low-mass young star clusters involve primary BHs with mass $<40$ M$_\odot$ and low mass ratios are extremely more common than in the field. Comparing our data with those of more massive star clusters ($10^3-3\times{}10^4$ M$_\odot$), we find a strong dependence of the percentage of exchanged BBHs on the mass of the host star cluster. In contrast, our results show just a mild correlation between the mass of the host star cluster and the efficiency of BBH mergers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools