Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Predictions for gamma-rays from clouds associated with supernova remnant PeVatrons

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.02026 v1 pith:N5CHNJIM submitted 2021-08-04 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords cloudscloudgamma-raydetectablefluxincludingparticlesources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Interstellar clouds can act as target material for hadronic cosmic rays; gamma-rays produced through inelastic proton-proton collisions and spatially associated with the clouds provide a key indicator of efficient particle acceleration. However, even for PeVatron sources reaching PeV energies, the system of cloud and accelerator must fulfil several conditions in order to produce a detectable gamma-ray flux. In this contribution, we characterise the necessary properties of both cloud and accelerator. Using available Supernova Remnant (SNR) and interstellar cloud catalogues, and assuming particle acceleration to PeV energies in a nearby SNR, we produce a ranked shortlist of the most promising target systems; those for which a detectable gamma-ray flux is predicted. We discuss detection prospects for future facilities including CTA and SWGO; and compare our predictions with known gamma-ray sources, including the Ultra-High-Energy sources recently detected by LHAASO. A range of model scenarios are tested, including variation in the diffusion coefficient and particle spectrum, under which the best candidate clouds in our shortlist are consistently bright. On average, a detectable gamma-ray flux is more likely for more massive clouds; for systems with lower separation distance between the SNR and cloud; and for slightly older SNRs, due to the time required for particles to traverse the separation distance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools