Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Newtonian Mechanics Based Transient Stability PART I: Machine Paradigms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.10413 v1 pith:CNQX3TNX submitted 2021-10-20 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords machinestabilityparadigmparadigmstrajectorymodelingsystemthree
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Individual-machine, superimposed-machine and equivalent-machine can be seen as the three major perspectives of the power system transient stability. In this paper, the machine paradigms are established according to the common thinking among the three different machines. The machine paradigms comprise of the three components, i.e., trajectory paradigm, modeling paradigm and energy paradigm. The trajectory paradigm is the reflection of the trajectory stability; the modeling paradigm is the two-machine-system modeling of the trajectory stability; and the energy paradigm is the stability evaluation of the two-machine system. Based on this, it is clarified that the machine paradigms can be expressed into the individual machine form or the equivalent machine form. Then, the relationship between the machine stability and the system stability are analyzed. Simulation results show that the effectiveness of both the individual-machine and the equivalent machine is fully based on the strict followings of the machine paradigms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools