Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Through the Lens of Nonlinear Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.05921 v4 pith:RETJSFIM submitted 2021-12-11 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords algorithmalgorithmschoicesdesignfilteringmethodsoptimizationperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms perform visual-inertial estimation via filtering or batch optimization methods. Empirical evidence suggests that filtering algorithms are computationally faster, while optimization methods are more accurate. This work presents an optimization-based framework that unifies these approaches, and allows users to flexibly implement different design choices, e.g., the number and types of variables maintained in the algorithm at each time. We prove that filtering methods correspond to specific design choices in our generalized framework. We then reformulate the Multi-State Constrained Kalman Filter (MSCKF), implement the reformulation on challenging image sequence datasets in simulation, and contrast its performance with that of sliding window based filters. Using these results, we explain the relative performance characteristics of these two classes of algorithms in the context of our algorithm. Finally, we illustrate that under different design choices, the empirical performance of our algorithm interpolates between those of state-of-the-art approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools