Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Run-and-back stitch search: novel block synchronous decoding for streaming encoder-decoder ASR

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.10190 v1 pith:IYOE7TGA submitted 2022-01-25 eess.AS cs.SD

classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords endpointdecodingstitchlatencyalgorithmapproachblockencoder-decoder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A streaming style inference of encoder-decoder automatic speech recognition (ASR) system is important for reducing latency, which is essential for interactive use cases. To this end, we propose a novel blockwise synchronous decoding algorithm with a hybrid approach that combines endpoint prediction and endpoint post-determination. In the endpoint prediction, we compute the expectation of the number of tokens that are yet to be emitted in the encoder features of the current blocks using the CTC posterior. Based on the expectation value, the decoder predicts the endpoint to realize continuous block synchronization, as a running stitch. Meanwhile, endpoint post-determination probabilistically detects backward jump of the source-target attention, which is caused by the misprediction of endpoints. Then it resumes decoding by discarding those hypotheses, as back stitch. We combine these methods into a hybrid approach, namely run-and-back stitch search, which reduces the computational cost and latency. Evaluations of various ASR tasks show the efficiency of our proposed decoding algorithm, which achieves a latency reduction, for instance in the Librispeech test set from 1487 ms to 821 ms at the 90th percentile, while maintaining a high recognition accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools