Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Practical Considerations of DER Coordination with Distributed Optimal Power Flow

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.04819 v1 pith:YUYEM7FJ submitted 2022-03-09 cs.CE cs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.CEcs.SYeess.SY
keywords distributeddopfcommunicationdifferentnetworkspoweranalyzedcomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The coordination of prosumer-owned, behind-the-meter distributed energy resources (DER) can be achieved using a multiperiod, distributed optimal power flow (DOPF), which satisfies network constraints and preserves the privacy of prosumers. To solve the problem in a distributed fashion, it is decomposed and solved using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), which may require many iterations between prosumers and the central entity (i.e., an aggregator). Furthermore, the computational burden is shared among the agents with different processing capacities. Therefore, computational constraints and communication requirements may make the DOPF infeasible or impractical. In this paper, part of the DOPF (some of the prosumer subproblems) is executed on a Raspberry Pi-based hardware prototype, which emulates a low processing power, edge computing device. Four important aspects are analyzed using test cases of different complexities. The first is the computation cost of executing the subproblems in the edge computing device. The second is the algorithm operation on congested electrical networks, which impacts the convergence speed of DOPF solutions. Third, the precision of the computed solution, including the trade-off between solution quality and the number of iterations, is examined. Fourth, the communication requirements for implementation across different communication networks are investigated. The above metrics are analyzed in four scenarios involving 26-bus and 51-bus networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools