Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Mechanical Characterization of Compliant Cellular Robots. Part I: Passive Stiffness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.06231 v1 pith:X5MRCM2J submitted 2022-03-11 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords stiffnesstopologiesmeshpassiveactuatorsanalysisbending-dominatedcellular
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modular Active Cell Robots (MACROs) are a design paradigm for modular robotic hardware that uses only two components, namely actuators and passive compliant joints. Under the MACRO approach, a large number of actuators and joints are connected to create mesh-like cellular robotic structures that can be actuated to achieve large deformation and shape-change. In this two-part paper, we study the importance of different possible mesh topologies within the MACRO framework. Regular and semi-regular tilings of the plane are used as the candidate mesh topologies and simulated using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). In Part 1, we use FEA to evaluate their passive stiffness characteristics. Using a strain energy method, the homogenized material properties (Young's modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson's ratio) of different mesh topologies are computed and compared. The results show that the stiffnesses increase with increasing nodal connectivity and that stretching-dominated topologies have higher stiffness compared to bending-dominated ones. We also investigate the role of relative actuator-node stiffness on the overall mesh characteristics. This analysis shows that the stiffness of stretching-dominated topologies scale directly with their cross-section area whereas the bending-dominated ones do not have such a direct relationship.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools