pith. sign in

arxiv: 2203.11521 · v2 · submitted 2022-03-22 · 💻 cs.DM · math.CO

Neighbour sum distinguishing edge-weightings with local constraints

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 11:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DM math.CO
keywords neighbour sum distinguishingedge-weightinglocal constraintsnice graphsmaximum degreebipartite graphsgraph colouring
0
0 comments X

The pith

Every nice graph with maximum degree at most 5 admits a neighbour sum distinguishing (Δ+2)-edge-weighting where vertices of degree at least 2 have at least two different incident weights.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves existence results for edge-weightings that make the sums of weights at adjacent vertices all different while adding a local requirement that certain vertices see at least two distinct weights among their incident edges. For any nice graph (one with no isolated K2 component) whose largest degree is five or less, the number of distinct weights needed is at most Δ+2 and the local requirement applies to every vertex of degree two or more. Separate arguments show that seven weights suffice for the local requirement at vertices of degree six and higher in arbitrary nice graphs, and that six weights suffice with the local requirement at all degree-two-or-higher vertices when the graph is bipartite.

Core claim

We prove that every nice graph with maximum degree at most 5 admits a neighbour sum distinguishing (Δ(G)+2)-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least 2 are incident with at least two edges of different weights. Furthermore, we prove that every nice graph admits a neighbour sum distinguishing 7-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least 6 are incident with at least two edges of different weights. Finally, we show that nice bipartite graphs admit a neighbour sum distinguishing 6-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least 2 are incident with at least two edges of different weights.

What carries the argument

A neighbour sum distinguishing k-edge-weighting (an assignment of integers from 1 to k to edges so that adjacent vertices receive different sums) equipped with the additional local constraint that every vertex of sufficient degree is incident to at least two edges carrying different weights.

If this is right

  • All nice graphs of maximum degree 5 possess such a weighting using at most Δ+2 weights with the local condition enforced everywhere.
  • All nice graphs possess a 7-weighting satisfying the neighbour-sum condition and the local condition at every vertex of degree 6 or more.
  • Nice bipartite graphs possess a 6-weighting satisfying the neighbour-sum condition and the local condition at every vertex of degree 2 or more.
  • The local non-monochromatic requirement can be met simultaneously with the global sum-distinguishing property under the stated degree and bipartiteness hypotheses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same local constraint may require more weights than the classical neighbour-sum-distinguishing problem without the constraint.
  • The inductive techniques used here could be tested for applicability to total weightings or other sum-distinguishing labelings that incorporate similar local diversity rules.
  • For graphs with maximum degree larger than 5 the gap between the 7-weight bound and the unconstrained problem remains open.

Load-bearing premise

Standard inductive or greedy constructions on finite simple graphs suffice to produce the required weightings without global obstructions created by the local diversity condition.

What would settle it

A single nice graph of maximum degree 5 for which no assignment of the numbers 1 through 7 to its edges produces distinct vertex sums at adjacent vertices while also ensuring every degree-at-least-2 vertex sees at least two different weights on its incident edges.

read the original abstract

A $k$-edge-weighting of $G$ is a mapping $\omega:E(G)\longrightarrow \{1,\ldots,k\}$. The edge-weighting of $G$ naturally induces a vertex-colouring $\sigma_{\omega}:V(G)\longrightarrow \mathbb{N}$ given by$\sigma_{\omega}(v)=\sum_{u\in N_G(v)}\omega(vu)$ for every $v\in V(G)$. The edge-weighting $\omega$ is neighbour sum distinguishing if it yields a proper vertex-colouring $\sigma_{\omega}$, \emph{i.e.}, $\sigma_{\omega}(u)\neq \sigma_{\omega}(v)$ for every edge $uv$ of $G$.We investigate a neighbour sum distinguishing edge-weighting with local constraints, namely, we assume that the set of edges incident to a vertex of large degree is not monochromatic. A graph is nice if it has no components isomorphic to $K_2$. We prove that every nice graph with maximum degree at most~5 admits a neighbour sum distinguishing $(\Delta(G)+2)$-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least~2 are incident with at least two edges of different weights. Furthermore, we prove that every nice graph admits a neighbour sum distinguishing $7$-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least~6 are incident with at least two edges of different weights. Finally, we show that nice bipartite graphs admit a neighbour sum distinguishing $6$-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least~2 are incident with at least two edges of different weights.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves three existence theorems for neighbour-sum-distinguishing k-edge-weightings of nice graphs (finite simple graphs with no K2 components) that additionally satisfy a local constraint: every vertex of sufficiently high degree is incident to at least two edges of distinct weights. Theorem 1 asserts that every nice graph with Δ(G) ≤ 5 admits such a weighting with k = Δ(G) + 2 where the local constraint holds for all vertices of degree ≥ 2. Theorem 2 asserts that every nice graph admits such a weighting with k = 7 where the local constraint holds for all vertices of degree ≥ 6. Theorem 3 asserts that every nice bipartite graph admits such a weighting with k = 6 where the local constraint holds for all vertices of degree ≥ 2. The weightings induce proper vertex colourings via the sum of incident weights.

Significance. If the proofs are correct, the results extend the literature on neighbour-sum-distinguishing edge weightings (related to the 1-2-3 conjecture) by adding explicit local non-monochromaticity constraints at high-degree vertices. The obtained bounds (Δ+2 for Δ≤5, constant 7 in general, constant 6 for bipartite graphs) are close to the best known bounds without the local constraints and are obtained via standard inductive or greedy combinatorial arguments on finite graphs. The paper supplies explicit, falsifiable existence statements for a well-defined class of graphs and constraints.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the precise definition of 'nice' (no K2 components) and the local constraint (at least two distinct weights at each qualifying vertex) in a single sentence for quick reference.
  2. Notation for the induced sum colouring σ_ω is introduced in the abstract but should be restated with the domain and codomain when first used in Section 1.
  3. The paper should include a short table or paragraph comparing the new bounds with the best known bounds for the unconstrained neighbour-sum-distinguishing problem (e.g., the 1-2-3 conjecture results).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their summary of our results and for recommending minor revision. No major comments appear in the report, so we have no points requiring point-by-point response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in combinatorial existence proofs

full rationale

The paper consists of three existence theorems for neighbour-sum-distinguishing edge weightings on finite nice graphs, proved via standard inductive or greedy combinatorial constructions. No quantities are defined in terms of other quantities by construction, no parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing steps reduce to self-citations or ansatzes imported from prior author work. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard axioms of finite simple graph theory (undirected edges, no loops or multiple edges) and the definition of nice graphs. No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Graphs are finite, undirected, simple, and have no components isomorphic to K2 (the 'nice' condition).
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the class of graphs under consideration.
  • domain assumption Standard combinatorial existence arguments (induction or greedy assignment) suffice to construct the required weightings.
    Implicit in any proof of such labeling theorems; the abstract provides no counterexample or obstruction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5842 in / 1604 out tokens · 31023 ms · 2026-05-24T11:33:21.892063+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Alon, Combinatorial Nullstellensatz , Combin

    N. Alon, Combinatorial Nullstellensatz , Combin. Probab. Comput. 8 (1999), 7–29

  2. [2]

    Bensmail, A 1-2-3-4 result for the 1-2-3 conjecture in 5-regular graph s, Discrete Appl

    J. Bensmail, A 1-2-3-4 result for the 1-2-3 conjecture in 5-regular graph s, Discrete Appl. Math. 257 (2019) 31–39

  3. [3]

    Dailly, ´E

    A. Dailly, ´E. Duchˆ ene, A. Parreau, E. Sidorowicz, The neighbour sum distinguishing relaxed edge colouring , Applied Mathematics and Computation 419 (2022) 126864

  4. [4]

    Dudek, D

    A. Dudek, D. Wajc, On the complexity of vertex-coloring edge-weightings , Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 13 (3) (2011) 45–50

  5. [5]

    Flandrin, A

    E. Flandrin, A. Marczyk, J. Przyby/suppress lo, J-F. Sacle, M. Wo´ zniak,Neighbour sum distin- guishing index , Graphs Combin. 29(5) (2013) 1329–1336

  6. [6]

    Y. Gao, G. Wang, J. Wu, A relaxed case on 1-2-3 conjecture , Graphs Combin. 32 (4) (2016) 1415–1421

  7. [7]

    J. Huo, Y. Wang, W. Wang, Neighbour-sum-distinguishing edge choosability of subcu bic graphs, J. Comb. Optim. 34 (3) (2017) 742–759

  8. [8]

    Kalkowski, M

    M. Kalkowski, M. Karo´ nski, F. Pfender, A new upper bound for the irregularity strength of graphs , SIAM J. Discrete Math. 25(3) (2011) 1319–1321

  9. [9]

    Karo´ nski, T

    M. Karo´ nski, T. /suppress Luczak, A. Thomason,Edge weights and vertex colours , J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 91 (2004) 151–157

  10. [10]

    H. Lu, Q. Yu, C.-Q. Zhang, Vertex-colouring 2-edge-weighting of graphs , European J. Combin. 32 (2011) 21–27

  11. [11]

    Przyby/suppress lo,Neighbor distinguishing edge colorings via the combinator ial nullstellensatz , SIAM J

    J. Przyby/suppress lo,Neighbor distinguishing edge colorings via the combinator ial nullstellensatz , SIAM J. Discrete Math. 27 (3) (2013) 1313–1322

  12. [12]

    Przyby/suppress lo,A note on asymptotically optimal neighbour sum distinguish ing colourings, European Journal of Combinatorics 77 (2019) 49–56

    J. Przyby/suppress lo,A note on asymptotically optimal neighbour sum distinguish ing colourings, European Journal of Combinatorics 77 (2019) 49–56

  13. [13]

    Przyby/suppress lo,The 1-2-3 Conjecture almost holds for regular graphs , J

    J. Przyby/suppress lo,The 1-2-3 Conjecture almost holds for regular graphs , J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. B 147 (2020) 183–200

  14. [14]

    Przyby/suppress lo, T-L

    J. Przyby/suppress lo, T-L. Wong,Neighbour distinguishing edge colourings via the Combinat orial Nullstellensatz revisited , J. Graph Theory 80 (2015) 299–312

  15. [15]

    Thomassen, Y

    C. Thomassen, Y. Wu, C.-Q. Zhang, The 3-flow conjecture, factors modulo k, and the 1-2-3-conjecture J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B, 121 (2016) 308–325

  16. [16]

    G. Wang, G. Yan, An improved upper bound for the neighbour sum distinguishin g index of graphs , Discrete Appl. Math. 175 (2014) 126–128

  17. [17]

    The 1-2-3 Conjecture and related problems: a survey

    B. Seamone, The 1-2-3 Conjecture and related problems: a survey , Technical report, available on-line at http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.5122, 2012. 27