Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large-eddy simulations of wind-driven cross ventilation, Part1: validation and sensitivity study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.00786 v1 pith:SY5AX7QP submitted 2022-04-02 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords ventilationflowgridinflowsensitivityconditionsnaturalrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Natural ventilation is gaining popularity in response to an increasing demand for a sustainable and healthy built environment, but the design of a naturally ventilated building can be challenging due to the inherent variability in the operating conditions that determine the natural ventilation flow. Large-eddy simulations (LES) have significant potential as an analysis method for natural ventilation flow, since they can provide an accurate prediction of turbulent flow at any location in the computational domain. However, the simulations can be computationally expensive, and few validation and sensitivity studies have been reported. The objectives of this study are to validate LES of wind-driven cross-ventilation and to quantify the sensitivity of the solution to the grid resolution and the inflow boundary conditions. We perform LES for an isolated building with two openings, using three different grid resolutions and two different inflow conditions with varying turbulence intensities. Predictions of the ventilation rate are compared to a reference wind-tunnel experiment available from literature, and we also quantify the age of air and ventilation efficiency. The results show that a sufficiently fine grid resolution is needed to provide accurate predictions of the detailed flow pattern and the age of air, while the inflow condition is found to affect the standard deviation of the instantaneous ventilation rate. However, for the cross-ventilation case modeled in this paper, the prediction of the mean ventilation flow rate is very robust, showing negligible sensitivity to the grid resolution or the inflow characteristics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From large-eddy simulations to deep learning: A U-net model for fast urban canopy flow predictions

    physics.comp-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A U-net trained on 252 LES urban configurations predicts mean wind speed and turbulence intensity with about 9% and 5% mean relative error, respectively, and runs in about one second.

Pith tools