REVIEW
Uptime-Optimized Cloud Architecture as a Brokered Service
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Enterprise workloads usually call for an uptime service level agreement (SLA) at the pain of contractual penalty in the event of slippage. Often, the strategy is to introduce ad-hoc HA (High Availability) mechanisms in response. Implemented solutions that we surveyed do not mathematically map their availability model to the required uptime SLA and to any expected penalty payout. In most client cases that we observed, this either resulted in an over-engineered solution that had more redundancies than was required, or in an inadequate solution that could potentially slip on the system uptime SLA stipulated in the contract. In this paper, we propose a framework backed by a model, to automatically determine the HA-enabled solution with the least TCO (total cost of ownership) for a given uptime SLA and slippage penalty. We attempt to establish that our work is best implemented as a brokered service that recommends an uptime-optimized cloud architecture.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.