REVIEW
Weighing the Darkness III: How Gaia Could, but Probably Won't, Astrometrically Detect Free-Floating Black Holes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The gravitational pull of an unseen companion to a luminous star is well-known to cause deviations to the parallax and proper motion of a star. In a previous paper in this series, we argue that the astrometric mission Gaia can identify long-period binaries by precisely measuring these arcs. An arc in a star's path can also be caused by a fly-by -- the hyperbolic encounter with another massive object. We quantify the apparent acceleration over time induced by a companion star as a function of the impact parameter, velocity of interaction, and companion mass. In principle, Gaia could be used to astrometrically identify the contribution of massive compact halo objects to the local dark matter potential of the Milky Way. However, after quantifying their rate and Gaia's sensitivity, we find that fly-bys are so rare that Gaia will probably never observe one. Therefore every star in the Gaia database exhibiting astrometric acceleration is likely in a long-period binary with another object. Nevertheless, we show how intermediate mass black holes, if they exist in the Solar Neighborhood, could be detected by the anomalously large accelerations they induce on nearby stars.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.