REVIEW 1 cited by
An axiomatic theory for anonymized risk sharing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We study an axiomatic framework for anonymized risk sharing. In contrast to traditional risk sharing settings, our framework requires no information on preferences, identities, private operations and realized losses from the individual agents, and thereby it is useful for modeling risk sharing in decentralized systems. Four axioms natural in such a framework -- actuarial fairness, risk fairness, risk anonymity, and operational anonymity -- are put forward and discussed. We establish the remarkable fact that the four axioms characterizes the conditional mean risk sharing rule, revealing the unique and prominent role of this popular risk sharing rule among all others in relevant applications of anonymized risk sharing. Several other properties and their relations to the four axioms are studied, as well as their implications in rationalizing the design of some sharing mechanisms in practice.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Compensation-based risk-sharing
In compensation-based risk-sharing funds, actuarial fairness is equivalent to matching each participant's contribution with his expected relative share of the fund, for both active and passive administrators; homogene...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.