Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Effects of Correctly Modeling Generator Step-Up Transformer Status in Geomagnetic Disturbance Studies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.11232 v1 pith:PYJZFIRC submitted 2022-08-23 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords transformerpowerstatusflowsgeneratorservicestudiescorrectly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In order to correctly model the impacts of geomagnetically induced current (GIC) flows, the generator step-up (GSU) transformer status must be properly modeled. In power flow studies, generators are typically removed from service without disconnecting their GSU transformers since the GSU transformer status has little to no impact on the power flow result. In reality, removing a generator from service involves also removing its GSU transformer from service. This difference presents a discrepancy between simulated behavior and system observations during geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) events. This paper presents GMD case studies on 2000-bus and 24,000-bus systems in which reactive power losses and geomagnetically induced currents are compared across scenarios in which the GSU transformers for the disconnected generators are either in-service or out-of-service. The results demonstrate a 3.2 to 15.5 percent error in reactive power losses when the GSU status is modeled incorrectly. Discrepancies of up to 95 A per phase for branch GIC flows and 450 A for transformer neutral GIC flows are also observed and visualized.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools