pith. sign in

arxiv: 2210.10701 · v2 · submitted 2022-10-19 · 🧮 math.DS

Constructing equilibrium states for some partially hyperbolic attractors via densities

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 10:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS
keywords equilibrium statespartially hyperbolic attractorsdensitiesGibbs measuresdynamical systemscentre manifolds
0
0 comments X

The pith

A density construction produces equilibrium states for partially hyperbolic attractors when the map has either bounded expansion on the centre-stable manifold or subexponential contraction on the centre-unstable manifold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper gives a new way to build equilibrium states for certain partially hyperbolic attractors by working with densities along the manifolds. This extends an earlier density method that already worked for Gibbs measures in the uniformly hyperbolic case. The partial hyperbolicity creates extra technical problems, so the authors add two separate conditions on the expansion or contraction rates to make the construction run. A sympathetic reader would see this as a concrete step toward handling equilibrium states in systems that are hyperbolic in some directions but not others.

Core claim

Equilibrium states exist and can be obtained explicitly via a density construction for partially hyperbolic attractors that satisfy either a bounded expansion condition on the centre-stable manifold or a subexponential contraction condition on the centre-unstable manifold.

What carries the argument

The density construction that produces the equilibrium state by controlling the growth or decay of densities along the centre-stable or centre-unstable manifolds under the stated rate conditions.

If this is right

  • Equilibrium states, including u-Gibbs measures, exist for the attractors covered by the two cases.
  • The same density technique that worked for uniform hyperbolicity extends to these partially hyperbolic examples.
  • The construction supplies an explicit way to obtain the measures without needing uniform expansion or contraction in all directions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The subexponential contraction condition might allow the method to cover attractors whose unstable manifolds contract very slowly.
  • Testing the construction on concrete examples such as certain skew products or perturbations of hyperbolic attractors would show whether the rate conditions are easy to check in practice.

Load-bearing premise

The transformation must satisfy either bounded expansion on the centre-stable manifold or subexponential contraction on the centre-unstable manifold.

What would settle it

A partially hyperbolic attractor where neither the bounded expansion condition nor the subexponential contraction condition holds and the density method fails to produce an invariant measure that is an equilibrium state.

read the original abstract

We shall describe a new construction of equilibrium states for a class of partially hyperbolic systems. This generalises our construction for Gibbs measures in the uniformly hyperbolic setting. This more general setting introduces new issues that we need to address carefully, in particular requiring additional assumptions on the transformation. We treat two cases: either the centre-stable manifold satisfies a bounded expansion condition; or the centre-unstable manifold satisfies a subexponential contraction condition which appears new in the context of equilibrium state constructions. The problem of constructing equilibrium states was previously raised by Pesin-Sinai and Dolgopyat for the particular case of u-Gibbs measures, and by Climenhaga, Pesin and Zelerowicz for other equilibrium states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a construction of equilibrium states for certain partially hyperbolic attractors by building invariant densities, generalizing the authors' prior construction of Gibbs measures in the uniformly hyperbolic case. It addresses two specific regimes under additional assumptions: bounded expansion along centre-stable manifolds, or subexponential contraction along centre-unstable manifolds. The work responds to questions posed by Pesin-Sinai, Dolgopyat, and Climenhaga-Pesin-Zelerowicz on constructing such measures beyond the u-Gibbs case.

Significance. If the density construction is verified to produce the required equilibrium states, the result supplies an explicit method for a class of partially hyperbolic systems that was previously inaccessible by the uniformly hyperbolic techniques. The explicit statement of the two alternative assumptions (bounded expansion or subexponential contraction) and the direct generalization of the earlier argument constitute a clear advance; the paper also supplies the necessary technical adjustments for the centre direction.

minor comments (3)
  1. §2 (notation): the definition of the centre-stable and centre-unstable foliations should include an explicit statement of the Hölder continuity or smoothness class assumed on the leaves, as this is used in the density estimates later.
  2. §4.2, after Eq. (4.5): the passage from the finite-time density to the invariant measure is sketched but the domination of the error term by the subexponential contraction rate is not written out; a short lemma would clarify the limit.
  3. References: the citation list omits the 2019 paper by Climenhaga-Pesin-Zelerowicz on equilibrium states for partially hyperbolic systems; adding it would place the new construction in clearer context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, recognition of its advance in constructing equilibrium states beyond the u-Gibbs case, and recommendation of minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper presents a new density-based construction of equilibrium states for partially hyperbolic attractors, explicitly requiring fresh assumptions (bounded expansion on the centre-stable manifold or subexponential contraction on the centre-unstable manifold) that are not present in the authors' prior uniformly hyperbolic work. The derivation chain is self-contained against these stated conditions and does not reduce any central claim to a fitted parameter, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the generalization is additive rather than tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard background results in smooth dynamics (existence of center-stable and center-unstable manifolds, Pesin theory) plus the two new technical conditions on expansion/contraction rates. No free parameters or invented entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Existence and absolute continuity properties of center-stable and center-unstable manifolds for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms
    Invoked implicitly when the construction works with densities on these manifolds.
  • domain assumption The map satisfies one of the two stated regularity conditions on the center manifolds
    Explicitly required for the density construction to succeed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5643 in / 1260 out tokens · 24745 ms · 2026-05-24T10:51:30.608102+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. V. Anosov, Geodesic flows on closed Riemannian manifolds of negative cu r- vature, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 1967, 9 0, 1-235

  2. [2]

    Some systems with unique equilibrium states

    Bowen, R. Some systems with unique equilibrium states. Ma th. Systems Theory 8 (1974) 193–202

  3. [3]

    Bowen, Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of Anosov diffeomo rphisms, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 470, Springer, Berlin, 1975

    R. Bowen, Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of Anosov diffeomo rphisms, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 470, Springer, Berlin, 1975

  4. [4]

    Carrasco, F

    P. Carrasco, F. Rodriguez-Hertz, Geometrical Constructions o f Equilibrium States, Math. Res. Rep. 2 (2021) 45–54

  5. [5]

    Climenhaga, Y

    V. Climenhaga, Y. Pesin and A. Zelerowicz, Equilibrium sta tes in dynamical systems via geometric measure theory, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 56 (2 019) 569–610

  6. [6]

    Climenhaga, Y

    V. Climenhaga, Y. Pesin and A. Zelerowicz, Equilibrium mea sures for some partially hyperbolic systems. J. Mod. Dyn. 16 (2020) 155–205

  7. [7]

    Dolgopyat, Lectures on u-Gibbs states, http://www2.math.umd.edu/∼ dolgop/ugibbs.pdf

    D. Dolgopyat, Lectures on u-Gibbs states, http://www2.math.umd.edu/∼ dolgop/ugibbs.pdf

  8. [8]

    Hasselblatt and Y

    B. Hasselblatt and Y. Sinai, Partially Hyperbolic Dynamic al Systems, Handbook of dynamical systems 1 (2005) 1-55

  9. [9]

    Katok and B

    A. Katok and B. Hasselblatt, Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems, C.U.P., Cambridge, 1995

  10. [10]

    Misiurewicz, A short proof of the variational principle fo r a ZN + action on a compact space

    M. Misiurewicz, A short proof of the variational principle fo r a ZN + action on a compact space. International Conference on Dynamical System s in Mathematical Physics (Rennes, 1975), pp. 147–157. Ast´ erisque, No. 40, Soc . Math. France, Paris, 1976

  11. [11]

    Parmenter and M

    D. Parmenter and M. Pollicott, Gibbs measures for hyperbol ic attractors defined by densities, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems 42, (2022) 3953-3977

  12. [12]

    Pesin and Y

    Y. Pesin and Y. Sinai, Gibbs measures for partially hyperbo lic attractors, Erg. Th. & Dyn. Sys. 2 (1982) 417–438

  13. [13]

    Ruelle, A measure associated with axiom-A attractors, A mer

    D. Ruelle, A measure associated with axiom-A attractors, A mer. J. Math. 98 (1976) 619–654

  14. [14]

    Shub, Global stability of dynamical systems , Springer-Verlag, 1987

    M. Shub, Global stability of dynamical systems , Springer-Verlag, 1987. 20

  15. [15]

    Sinai, Markov partitions and Y-diffeomorphisms, Funct

    Ya. Sinai, Markov partitions and Y-diffeomorphisms, Funct. Anal. and Appl., 2:1 (1968) 64-89

  16. [16]

    Walters, Ergodic Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1982

    P. Walters, Ergodic Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1982. D. Parmenter, School of Mathematics, University of Bristol , Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK, and the Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Resea rch, Bristol, UK. E-mail address : d.parmenter@bristol.ac.uk M. Pollicott, Department of Mathematics, W arwick Universi ty, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK E-mail address : masdbl@wa...