REVIEW
AI-Based Emotion Recognition: Promise, Peril, and Prescriptions for Prosocial Path
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Automated emotion recognition (AER) technology can detect humans' emotional states in real-time using facial expressions, voice attributes, text, body movements, and neurological signals and has a broad range of applications across many sectors. It helps businesses get a much deeper understanding of their customers, enables monitoring of individuals' moods in healthcare, education, or the automotive industry, and enables identification of violence and threat in forensics, to name a few. However, AER technology also risks using artificial intelligence (AI) to interpret sensitive human emotions. It can be used for economic and political power and against individual rights. Human emotions are highly personal, and users have justifiable concerns about privacy invasion, emotional manipulation, and bias. In this paper, we present the promises and perils of AER applications. We discuss the ethical challenges related to the data and AER systems and highlight the prescriptions for prosocial perspectives for future AER applications. We hope this work will help AI researchers and developers design prosocial AER applications.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.