Pith. sign in

REVIEW

KGMM -- A Maturity Model for Scholarly Knowledge Graphs based on Intertwined Human-Machine Collaboration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.12223 v1 pith:OFI3YSM3 submitted 2022-11-22 cs.DL cs.HC

classification cs.DLcs.HC
keywords knowledgegraphsmodelhuman-machineintertwinedmaturityqualityscholarly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge Graphs (KG) have gained increasing importance in science, business and society in the last years. However, most knowledge graphs were either extracted or compiled from existing sources. There are only relatively few examples where knowledge graphs were genuinely created by an intertwined human-machine collaboration. Also, since the quality of data and knowledge graphs is of paramount importance, a number of data quality assessment models have been proposed. However, they do not take the specific aspects of intertwined human-machine curated knowledge graphs into account. In this work, we propose a graded maturity model for scholarly knowledge graphs (KGMM), which specifically focuses on aspects related to the joint, evolutionary curation of knowledge graphs for digital libraries. Our model comprises 5 maturity stages with 20 quality measures. We demonstrate the implementation of our model in a large scale scholarly knowledge graph curation effort.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools