Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Performance Enhancement Strategies for Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiplication (SpMV) and Iterative Linear Solvers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.07490 v1 pith:2XN6UIHM submitted 2022-12-14 cs.DS cs.NAmath.NA

classification cs.DScs.NAmath.NA
keywords spmvsparseiterativelinearresearcharchitecturescomputingmultiplication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Iterative solutions of sparse linear systems and sparse eigenvalue problems have a fundamental role in vital fields of scientific research and engineering. The crucial computing kernel for such iterative solutions is the multiplication of a sparse matrix by a dense vector. Efficient implementation of sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) and linear solvers are therefore essential and has been subjected to extensive research across a variety of computing architectures and accelerators such as central processing units (CPUs), graphical processing units (GPUs), many integrated cores (MICs), and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Unleashing the full potential of an architecture/accelerator requires determining the factors that affect an efficient implementation of SpMV. This article presents the first of its kind, in-depth survey covering over two hundred state-of-the-art optimization schemes for solving sparse iterative linear systems with a focus on computing SpMV. A new taxonomy for iterative solutions and SpMV techniques common to all architectures is proposed. This article includes reviews of SpMV techniques for all architectures to consolidate a single taxonomy to encourage cross-architectural and heterogeneous-architecture developments. However, the primary focus is on GPUs. The major contributions as well as the primary, secondary, and tertiary contributions of the SpMV techniques are first highlighted utilizing the taxonomy and then qualitatively compared. A summary of the current state of the research for each architecture is discussed separately. Finally, several open problems and key challenges for future research directions are outlined.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools