Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving Noise Robustness for Spoken Content Retrieval using Semi-supervised ASR and N-best Transcripts for BERT-based Ranking Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.06056 v1 pith:NY6QCASU submitted 2023-01-15 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords transcriptsn-bestsearchsemi-supervisedspokenbert-basedeffectivenessretrieval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

BERT-based re-ranking and dense retrieval (DR) systems have been shown to improve search effectiveness for spoken content retrieval (SCR). However, both methods can still show a reduction in effectiveness when using ASR transcripts in comparison to accurate manual transcripts. We find that a known-item search task on the How2 dataset of spoken instruction videos shows a reduction in mean reciprocal rank (MRR) scores of 10-14%. As a potential method to reduce this disparity, we investigate the use of semi-supervised ASR transcripts and N-best ASR transcripts to mitigate ASR errors for spoken search using BERT-based ranking. Semi-supervised ASR transcripts brought 2-5.5% MRR improvements over standard ASR transcripts and our N-best early fusion methods for BERT DR systems improved MRR by 3-4%. Combining semi-supervised transcripts with N-best early fusion for BERT DR reduced the MRR gap in search effectiveness between manual and ASR transcripts by more than 50% from 14.32% to 6.58%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools