pith. sign in

arxiv: 2302.04507 · v1 · pith:BQBWH5V6new · submitted 2023-02-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Euclid preparation: XXVIII. Modelling of the weak lensing angular power spectrum

Euclid Collaboration: A. C. Deshpande , T. Kitching , A. Hall , M. L. Brown , N. Aghanim , L. Amendola , N. Auricchio , M. Baldi
show 194 more authors
R. Bender D. Bonino E. Branchini M. Brescia J. Brinchmann S. Camera G. P. Candini V. Capobianco C. Carbone V. F. Cardone J. Carretero F. J. Castander M. Castellano S. Cavuoti A. Cimatti R. Cledassou G. Congedo C.J. Conselice L. Conversi L. Corcione F. Courbin M. Cropper A. Da Silva H. Degaudenzi M. Douspis F. Dubath C. A. J. Duncan X. Dupac S. Farrens S. Ferriol P. Fosalba M. Frailis E. Franceschi M. Fumana S. Galeotta B. Garilli B. Gillis C. Giocoli A. Grazian F. Grupp S. V. H. Haugan H. Hoekstra W. Holmes A. Hornstrup P. Hudelot K. Jahnke S. Kermiche M. Kilbinger M. Kunz H. Kurki-Suonio S. Ligori P. B. Lilje I. Lloro E. Maiorano O. Mansutti O. Marggraf K. Markovic F. Marulli R. Massey S. Mei Y. Mellier M. Meneghetti G. Meylan L. Moscardini S.-M. Niemi J. W. Nightingale T. Nutma C. Padilla S. Paltani F. Pasian K. Pedersen V. Pettorino S. Pires G. Polenta M. Poncet L. A. Popa F. Raison A. Renzi J. Rhodes G. Riccio E. Romelli M. Roncarelli E. Rossetti R. Saglia D. Sapone B. Sartoris P. Schneider T. Schrabback A. Secroun G. Seidel S. Serrano C. Sirignano G. Sirri L. Stanco P. Tallada-Crespi I. Tereno R. Toledo-Moreo F. Torradeflot I. Tutusaus E. A. Valentijn L. Valenziano T. Vassallo Y. Wang J. Weller A. Zacchei G. Zamorani J. Zoubian S. Andreon S. Bardelli A. Boucaud E. Bozzo C. Colodro-Conde D. Di Ferdinando G. Fabbian M. Farina J. Gracia-Carpio E. Keihanen V. Lindholm N. Mauri V. Scottez M. Tenti E. Zucca Y. Akrami C. Baccigalupi A. Balaguera-Antolinez M. Ballardini F. Bernardeau A. Biviano A. Blanchard A. S. Borlaff C. Burigana R. Cabanac A. Cappi C. S. Carvalho S. Casas G. Castignani T. Castro K. C. Chambers A. R. Cooray J. Coupon H.M. Courtois S. Davini S. de la Torre G. De Lucia G. Desprez H. Dole J. A. Escartin S. Escoffier I. Ferrero F. Finelli J. Garcia-Bellido K. George F. Giacomini G. Gozaliasl H. Hildebrandt J. J. E. Kajava V. Kansal C. C. Kirkpatrick L. Legrand A. Loureiro J. Macias-Perez M. Magliocchetti G. Mainetti R. Maoli M. Martinelli N. Martinet C. J. A. P. Martins S. Matthew L. Maurin R. B. Metcalf P. Monaco G. Morgante S. Nadathur A. A. Nucita L. Patrizii A. Peel J. Pollack V. Popa C. Porciani D. Potter A. Pourtsidou M. Pontinen P. Reimberg A.G. Sanchez Z. Sakr A. Schneider E. Sefusatti M. Sereno A. Shulevski A. Spurio Mancini J. Steinwagner R. Teyssier M. Viel I. A. Zinchenko
This is my paper
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords sigmaeffectsbiasescosmologicalfindomegaeuclidparameter
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This work considers which higher-order effects in modelling the cosmic shear angular power spectra must be taken into account for Euclid. We identify which terms are of concern, and quantify their individual and cumulative impact on cosmological parameter inference from Euclid. We compute the values of these higher-order effects using analytic expressions, and calculate the impact on cosmological parameter estimation using the Fisher matrix formalism. We review 24 effects and find the following potentially need to be accounted for: the reduced shear approximation, magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, local Universe effects, and the flat Universe assumption. Upon computing these explicitly, and calculating their cosmological parameter biases, using a maximum multipole of $\ell=5000$, we find that the magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, and local Universe terms individually produce significant ($\,>0.25\sigma$) cosmological biases in one or more parameters, and accordingly must be accounted for. In total, over all effects, we find biases in $\Omega_{\rm m}$, $\Omega_{\rm b}$, $h$, and $\sigma_{8}$ of $0.73\sigma$, $0.28\sigma$, $0.25\sigma$, and $-0.79\sigma$, respectively, for flat $\Lambda$CDM. For the $w_0w_a$CDM case, we find biases in $\Omega_{\rm m}$, $\Omega_{\rm b}$, $h$, $n_{\rm s}$, $\sigma_{8}$, and $w_a$ of $1.49\sigma$, $0.35\sigma$, $-1.36\sigma$, $1.31\sigma$, $-0.84\sigma$, and $-0.35\sigma$, respectively; which are increased relative to the $\Lambda$CDM due to additional degeneracies as a function of redshift and scale.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. KiDS+VIKING-450 cosmology with Bayesian hierarchical model redshift distributions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    Bayesian hierarchical modeling of photometric redshifts in KiDS+VIKING-450 raises S8 to 0.756 ± 0.039 and reduces Planck tension to 1.9σ.