Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the calibration of stochastic car following models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04648 v1 pith:ZLC4Z57G submitted 2023-02-09 physics.soc-ph

classification physics.soc-ph
keywords methodmodelscalibrationstochasticerrormethodsexperimentalstochasticity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent experimental and empirical observations have demonstrated that stochasticity plays a critical role in car following (CF) dynamics. To reproduce the observations, quite a few stochastic CF models have been proposed. However, while calibrating the deterministic CF models is well investigated, studies on how to calibrate the stochastic models are lacking. Motivated by this fact, this paper aims to address this fundamental research gap. Firstly, the CF experiment under the same driving environment is conducted and analyzed. Based on the experimental results, we test two previous calibration methods, i.e., the method to minimize the Multiple Runs Mean (MRMean) error and the method of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Deficiencies of the two methods have been identified. Next, we propose a new method to minimize the Multiple Runs Minimum (MRMin) error. Calibration based on the experimental data and the synthetic data demonstrates that the new method outperforms the two previous methods. Furthermore, the mechanisms of different methods are explored from the perspective of error analysis. The analysis indicates that the new method can be regarded as a nested optimization model. The method separates the aleatoric errors caused by stochasticity from the epistemic error caused by parameters, and it is able to deal with the two kinds of errors effectively. Finally, we find that under the calibration framework of stochastic CF models, the calibrated parameter set using spacing as MoP may not always outperform that using velocity as MoP. These findings are expected to enhance the understanding of the role of stochasticity in CF dynamics where the new calibration framework for stochastic CF models is established.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools