Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Designing Fairness in Autonomous Peer-to-peer Energy Trading

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04771 v1 pith:7BCYICPR submitted 2023-02-09 eess.SY cs.MAcs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.MAcs.SY
keywords tradingpeer-to-peerautonomousenergypricesalgorithmbeneficialdesigning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Several autonomous energy management and peer-to-peer trading mechanisms for future energy markets have been recently proposed based on optimization and game theory. In this paper, we study the impact of trading prices on the outcome of these market designs for energy-hub networks. We prove that, for a generic choice of trading prices, autonomous peer-to-peer trading is always network-wide beneficial but not necessarily individually beneficial for each hub. Therefore, we leverage hierarchical game theory to formalize the problem of designing locally-beneficial and network-wide fair peer-to-peer trading prices. Then, we propose a scalable and privacy-preserving price-mediation algorithm that provably converges to a profile of such prices. Numerical simulations on a 3-hub network show that the proposed algorithm can indeed incentivize active participation of energy hubs in autonomous peer-to-peer trading schemes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools