Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Online Minimum Spanning Trees with Weight Predictions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.12029 v1 pith:HJR2OQUW submitted 2023-02-23 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords predictionsalgorithmalgorithmsanalysisfollow-the-predictionsspanningaccordingcompetitive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the minimum spanning tree problem with predictions, using the weight-arrival model, i.e., the graph is given, together with predictions for the weights of all edges. Then the actual weights arrive one at a time and an irrevocable decision must be made regarding whether or not the edge should be included into the spanning tree. In order to assess the quality of our algorithms, we define an appropriate error measure and analyze the performance of the algorithms as a function of the error. We prove that, according to competitive analysis, the simplest algorithm, Follow-the-Predictions, is optimal. However, intuitively, one should be able to do better, and we present a greedy variant of Follow-the-Predictions. In analyzing that algorithm, we believe we present the first random order analysis of a non-trivial online algorithm with predictions, by which we obtain an algorithmic separation. This may be useful for distinguishing between algorithms for other problems when Follow-the-Predictions is optimal according to competitive analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools