Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Using online student focus groups in the development of new educational resources

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.00149 v1 pith:TIZXXK6F submitted 2023-03-31 stat.OT

classification stat.OT
keywords resourcesfocusgroupsstudentsdevelopmentonlineresourceeducational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Educational resources, such as web apps and self-directed tutorials, have become popular tools for teaching and active learning. Ideally, students - the intended users of these resources - should be involved in the resource development stage. However, in practice students often only interact with fully developed resources, when it might be too late to incorporate changes. Previous work has addressed this by involving students in the development of new resources via in-person focus groups and interviews. In these, the resource developers observe students interacting with the resource. This allows developers to incorporate their observations and students' direct feedback into further development of the resource. However, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, carrying out in-person focus groups became infeasible due to social distancing restrictions. Instead, online meetings and classes became ubiquitous. In this work, we describe a fully-online methodology to evaluate new resources in development. Specifically, our methodology consists of carrying out student focus groups via online video conferencing software. We assessed two educational resources for introductory statistics using our methodology and found that the online setting allowed us to obtain rich, detailed information from the students. We also found online focus groups to be more efficient: students and researchers did not need to travel and scheduling was not restricted by the availability of physical space. Our findings suggest that online focus groups are an attractive alternative to in-person focus groups for student assessment of resources in development, even now that pandemic restrictions are being eased.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools