Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Energy Management for Networked Microgrids via Objective-Based ADMM

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.03649 v1 pith:J5C73GB3 submitted 2023-04-07 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords microgridsproposedenergynetworkstrategyadmmdecentralizedexchange
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a decentralized energy management (DEM) strategy for a network of local microgrids, providing economically balanced energy schedules for all participating microgrids. The proposed DEM strategy can preserve the privacy of each microgrid by only requiring them to share network power exchange information. The proposed DEM strategy enhances the traditional alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) formulation for networks of microgrids by examining the global objective value as well as the solution quality. A novel stopping decision combining these two metrics is proposed for the enhanced objective-based ADMM (OB-ADMM) method. This paper also presents a centralized energy management (CEM) model as a benchmark, and a post-processing proportional exchange algorithm (PEA) to balance the economic benefit of each microgrid. The resulting proposed OB-ADMM model combined with the PEA delivers the final high-fidelity optimal solution for multiple microgrids in a grid-connected collaborative power exchange network. Moreover, the proposed decentralized operational strategy preserves the economic and privacy interests of individual microgrid participants. Different network cases are simulated to test the algorithm's performance, and the results validate the aforementioned claims.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools