Pith sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.17277 v1 pith:GG6Z4JBZ submitted 2023-06-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph

Speeding up high-throughput characterization of materials libraries by active learning: autonomous electrical resistance measurements

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph
keywords materialsmeasurementautonomouslibrariesmodelactivealgorithmcharacterization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

High-throughput experimentation enables efficient search space exploration for the discovery and optimization of new materials. However, large search spaces of, e.g., compositionally complex materials, require decreasing characterization times significantly. Here, an autonomous measurement algorithm was developed, which leverages active learning based on a Gaussian process model capable of iteratively scanning a materials library based on the highest uncertainty. The algorithm is applied to a four-point probe electrical resistance measurement device, frequently used to obtain indications for regions of interest in materials libraries. Ten materials libraries with different complexities of composition and property trends are analyzed to validate the model. By stopping the process before the entire library is characterized and predicting the remaining measurement areas, the measurement efficiency can be improved drastically. As robustness is essential for autonomous measurements, intrinsic outlier handling is built into the model and a dynamic stopping criterion based on the mean predicted covariance is proposed. A measurement time reduction of about 70-90% was observed while still ensuring an accuracy of above 90%.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.