Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Should We Even Optimize for Execution Energy? Rethinking Mapping for MAGIC Design Style

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.03669 v1 pith:XKEYZ7YX submitted 2023-07-07 cs.ET

classification cs.ET
keywords energymagicdesignexecutionoperationsstyleconsumptionestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Memristor-based logic-in-memory (LiM) has become popular as a means to overcome the von Neumann bottleneck in traditional data-intensive computing. Recently, the memristor-aided logic (MAGIC) design style has gained immense traction for LiM due to its simplicity. However, understanding the energy distribution during the design of logic operations within the memristive memory is crucial in assessing such an implementation's significance. The current energy estimation methods rely on coarse-grained techniques, which underestimate the energy consumption of MAGIC-styled operations performed on a memristor crossbar. To address this issue, we analyze the energy breakdown in MAGIC operations and propose a solution that utilizes mapping from the SIMPLER MAGIC tool to achieve accurate energy estimation through SPICE simulations. In contrast to existing research that primarily focuses on optimizing execution energy, our findings reveal that the memristor's initialization energy in the MAGIC design style is, on average, 68x higher. We demonstrate that this initialization energy significantly dominates the overall energy consumption. By highlighting this aspect, we aim to redirect the attention of designers towards developing algorithms and strategies that prioritize optimizations in initializations rather than execution for more effective energy savings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools