pith. sign in

arxiv: 2308.05307 · v3 · submitted 2023-08-10 · 🧮 math.AG

Seidel and Pieri products in cominuscule quantum K-theory

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 07:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG
keywords quantum K-theorySchubert classescominuscule flag varietiesSeidel representationPieri formulasGromov-Witten invariantsRichardson varieties
0
0 comments X

The pith

In quantum K-theory of cominuscule flag varieties, Seidel class times Schubert class equals one Schubert class times a power of q.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves explicit product formulas for Schubert classes in the quantum K-theory ring of a cominuscule flag variety. The main result is a K-theory version of the Seidel representation, where the quantum product of any Seidel class with an arbitrary Schubert class is a single Schubert class multiplied by a power of the deformation parameter q. It also establishes new Pieri formulas for maximal orthogonal Grassmannians and Lagrangian Grassmannians, plus a new proof of the known Pieri formula for type A Grassmannians. All formulas are expressed using quantum shapes that index the basis elements q^d of the ring. Additional results include a closed formula for K-theoretic Gromov-Witten invariants of Pieri type on Lagrangian Grassmannians and a rationality statement for certain points on Richardson varieties in symplectic Grassmannians.

Core claim

In the quantum K-theory ring QK(X) of a cominuscule flag variety X, the quantum product of a Seidel class with an arbitrary Schubert class equals a single Schubert class times a power of the deformation parameter q. New Pieri formulas are proved for the quantum K-theory of maximal orthogonal Grassmannians and Lagrangian Grassmannians, and a new proof is given for the Pieri formula in the quantum K-theory of Grassmannians of type A. The formulas admit simple statements in terms of quantum shapes representing the natural basis elements q^d [O_{X^u}] of QK(X).

What carries the argument

Quantum shapes, which index the basis elements q^d [O_{X^u}] of QK(X) and make the product formulas reduce to single terms.

Load-bearing premise

The flag variety must be cominuscule, otherwise the quantum products need not reduce to single terms times a power of q.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the quantum product between a Seidel class and a Schubert class in the quantum K-theory of the Lagrangian Grassmannian that produces either multiple nonzero terms or a coefficient that is not a pure power of q.

read the original abstract

We prove a collection of formulas for products of Schubert classes in the quantum $K$-theory ring $QK(X)$ of a cominuscule flag variety $X$. This includes a $K$-theory version of the Seidel representation, stating that the quantum product of a Seidel class with an arbitrary Schubert class is equal to a single Schubert class times a power of the deformation parameter $q$. We also prove new Pieri formulas for the quantum $K$-theory of maximal orthogonal Grassmannians and Lagrangian Grassmannians, and give a new proof of the known Pieri formula for the quantum $K$-theory of Grassmannians of type A. Our formulas have simple statements in terms of quantum shapes that represent the natural basis elements $q^d[{\mathcal O}_{X^u}]$ of $QK(X)$. Along the way we give a simple formula for $K$-theoretic Gromov-Witten invariants of Pieri type for Lagrangian Grassmannians, and prove a rationality result for the points in a Richardson variety in a symplectic Grassmannian that are perpendicular to a point in projective space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves explicit product formulas for Schubert classes in the quantum K-theory ring QK(X) of cominuscule flag varieties X. This includes a K-theoretic Seidel representation asserting that the quantum product of a Seidel class with an arbitrary Schubert class equals a single Schubert class times a power of the deformation parameter q. It also establishes new Pieri formulas for the quantum K-theory of maximal orthogonal Grassmannians and Lagrangian Grassmannians, gives a new proof of the known Pieri formula in type A, and supplies a simple formula for K-theoretic Gromov-Witten invariants of Pieri type on Lagrangian Grassmannians together with a rationality result for certain points in Richardson varieties in symplectic Grassmannians. All formulas are expressed in terms of quantum shapes that form a natural basis for QK(X).

Significance. If the stated proofs hold, the results supply concrete, combinatorially simple multiplication rules in quantum K-theory precisely in the cominuscule setting where the products reduce to single terms times a power of q. This extends the Seidel representation to K-theory, furnishes new Pieri rules, and provides a direct combinatorial basis via quantum shapes, which are strengths for explicit computations and structural understanding of the ring.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the formulas are proved, but the manuscript should include explicit section references or theorem numbers for each claimed identity (Seidel representation, each Pieri rule, and the Gromov-Witten formula) so that readers can locate the derivations without searching the full text.
  2. Notation for quantum shapes and the basis elements q^d [O_{X^u}] is introduced in the abstract; a dedicated preliminary subsection should collect all definitions of these objects and the cominuscule condition before the statements of the main theorems.
  3. The rationality result for points in Richardson varieties is mentioned only briefly in the abstract; the manuscript should clarify in which section this appears and whether it is used in the proofs of the product formulas or is an independent result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, recognition of its significance, and recommendation for minor revision. No major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are self-contained proofs

full rationale

The paper supplies explicit mathematical proofs of product formulas (Seidel representation reducing to single Schubert class times q-power, plus Pieri formulas) that hold under the cominuscule restriction on X. Quantum shapes are introduced as the natural basis for QK(X), and the identities are established directly via algebraic geometry methods without fitted parameters, self-definitional reductions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the central claims to their inputs. The argument is restricted to the cominuscule setting where the formulas simplify, and the derivations remain independent of the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the cominuscule assumption is treated as background rather than a new postulate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1022 out tokens · 31526 ms · 2026-05-24T07:37:07.116010+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Billey and I

    S. Billey and I. Coskun. Singularities of generalized R ichardson varieties. Comm. Algebra , 40(4):1466--1495, 2012

  2. [2]

    Bertram, I

    A. Bertram, I. Ciocan-Fontanine, and W. Fulton. Quantum multiplication of S chur polynomials. J. Algebra , 219(2):728--746, 1999

  3. [3]

    A. S. Buch, P.-E. Chaput, L. C. Mihalcea, and N. Perrin. Finiteness of cominuscule quantum K -theory. Ann. Sci. \' E c. Norm. Sup\' e r. (4) , 46(3):477--494 (2013), 2013

  4. [4]

    A. S. Buch, P.-E. Chaput, L. C. Mihalcea, and N. Perrin. A C hevalley formula for the equivariant quantum K -theory of cominuscule varieties. Algebr. Geom. , 5(5):568--595, 2018

  5. [5]

    A. S. Buch, P.-E. Chaput, L. C. Mihalcea, and N. Perrin. Projected G romov- W itten varieties in cominuscule spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 146(9):3647--3660, 2018

  6. [6]

    A. S. Buch, P.-E. Chaput, L. C. Mihalcea, and N. Perrin. Positivity of minuscule quantum K -theory. arXiv:2205.08630, 2022

  7. [7]

    P. Belkale. Transformation formulas in quantum cohomology. Compos. Math. , 140(3):778--792, 2004

  8. [8]

    A. Bertram. Quantum S chubert calculus. Adv. Math. , 128(2):289--305, 1997

  9. [9]

    A. S. Buch, A. Kresch, and H. Tamvakis. Gromov- W itten invariants on G rassmannians. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 16(4):901--915, 2003

  10. [10]

    A. S. Buch, A. Kresch, and H. Tamvakis. Quantum P ieri rules for isotropic G rassmannians. Invent. Math. , 178(2):345--405, 2009

  11. [11]

    A. S. Buch, A. Kresch, and H. Tamvakis. A G iambelli formula for even orthogonal G rassmannians. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 708:17--48, 2015

  12. [12]

    A. S. Buch and L. C. Mihalcea. Quantum K -theory of G rassmannians. Duke Math. J. , 156(3):501--538, 2011

  13. [13]

    A. S. Buch and L. C. Mihalcea. Curve neighborhoods of S chubert varieties. J. Differential Geom. , 99(2):255--283, 2015

  14. [14]

    A. S. Buch and V. Ravikumar. Pieri rules for the K -theory of cominuscule G rassmannians. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 668:109--132, 2012

  15. [15]

    M. Brion. Positivity in the G rothendieck group of complex flag varieties. volume 258, pages 137--159. 2002. Special issue in celebration of Claudio Procesi's 60th birthday

  16. [16]

    A. S. Buch and M. J. Samuel. K -theory of minuscule varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 719:133--171, 2016

  17. [17]

    A. S. Buch. Quantum cohomology of G rassmannians. Compositio Math. , 137(2):227--235, 2003

  18. [18]

    A. S. Buch and C. Wang. Positivity determines the quantum cohomology of G rassmannians. Algebra Number Theory , 15(6):1505--1521, 2021

  19. [19]

    Chaput, L

    P.-E. Chaput, L. Manivel, and N. Perrin. Quantum cohomology of minuscule homogeneous spaces. Transform. Groups , 13(1):47--89, 2008

  20. [20]

    Chaput, L

    P.-E. Chaput, L. Manivel, and N. Perrin. Affine symmetries of the equivariant quantum cohomology ring of rational homogeneous spaces. Math. Res. Lett. , 16(1):7--21, 2009

  21. [21]

    Chaput and N

    P.-E. Chaput and N. Perrin. Rationality of some G romov- W itten varieties and application to quantum K -theory. Commun. Contemp. Math. , 13(1):67--90, 2011

  22. [22]

    Fulton and R

    W. Fulton and R. Pandharipande. Notes on stable maps and quantum cohomology. In Algebraic geometry--- S anta C ruz 1995 , volume 62 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pages 45--96. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997

  23. [23]

    Fulton and C

    W. Fulton and C. Woodward. On the quantum product of S chubert classes. J. Algebraic Geom. , 13(4):641--661, 2004

  24. [24]

    R. M. Green. Combinatorics of minuscule representations , volume 199 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013

  25. [25]

    Hagiwara

    M. Hagiwara. Minuscule heaps over D ynkin diagrams of type A . Electron. J. Combin. , 11(1):Research Paper 3, 20, 2004

  26. [26]

    Knutson, T

    A. Knutson, T. Lam, and D. Speyer. Projections of R ichardson varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 687:133--157, 2014

  27. [27]

    Kresch and H

    A. Kresch and H. Tamvakis. Quantum cohomology of the L agrangian G rassmannian. J. Algebraic Geom. , 12(4):777--810, 2003

  28. [28]

    Kresch and H

    A. Kresch and H. Tamvakis. Quantum cohomology of orthogonal G rassmannians. Compos. Math. , 140(2):482--500, 2004

  29. [29]

    C. Lenart. Combinatorial aspects of the K -theory of G rassmannians. Ann. Comb. , 4(1):67--82, 2000

  30. [30]

    C. Li, Z. Liu, J. Song, and M. Yang. On S eidel representation in quantum K -theory of G rassmannians. arXiv:2211.16902, 2022

  31. [31]

    N. Perrin. Small resolutions of minuscule S chubert varieties. Compos. Math. , 143(5):1255--1312, 2007

  32. [32]

    Postnikov

    A. Postnikov. Affine approach to quantum S chubert calculus. Duke Math. J. , 128(3):473--509, 2005

  33. [33]

    R. A. Proctor. Bruhat lattices, plane partition generating functions, and minuscule representations. European J. Combin. , 5(4):331--350, 1984

  34. [34]

    Ravikumar

    V. Ravikumar. Triple intersection formulas for isotropic grassmannians . ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2013. Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick

  35. [35]

    Ravikumar

    V. Ravikumar. Triple intersection formulas for isotropic G rassmannians. Algebra Number Theory , 9(3):681--723, 2015

  36. [36]

    R. W. Richardson. Intersections of double cosets in algebraic groups. Indag. Math. (N.S.) , 3(1):69--77, 1992

  37. [37]

    P. Seidel. _1 of symplectic automorphism groups and invertibles in quantum homology rings. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 7(6):1046--1095, 1997

  38. [38]

    Tarigradschi

    M. Tarigradschi. Curve neighborhoods of S eidel products in quantum cohomology. arXiv:2309.05985, 2023

  39. [39]

    E. Witten. The V erlinde algebra and the cohomology of the G rassmannian. In Geometry, topology, & physics , Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology, IV, pages 357--422. Int. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995