Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Dirichlet character analogue of Ramanujan's formula for odd zeta values

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.08988 v2 pith:2UZUMRTA submitted 2023-08-17 math.NT

classification math.NT
keywords identityramanujanmathbbserieszetaauthorcharacterdirichlet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In 2001, Kanemitsu, Tanigawa, and Yoshimoto studied the following generalized Lambert series, $$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n^{N-2h} }{\exp(n^N x)-1}, $$ for $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and $h\in \mathbb{Z}$ with some restriction on $h$. Recently, Dixit and the last author pointed out that this series has already been present in the Lost Notebook of Ramanujan with a more general form. Although, Ramanujan did not provide any transformation identity for it. In the same paper, Dixit and the last author found an elegant generalization of Ramanujan's celebrated identity for $\zeta(2m+1)$ while extending the results of Kanemitsu et al. In a subsequent work, Kanemitsu et al. explored another extended version of the aforementioned series, namely, $$\sum_{r=1}^{q}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\chi(r)n^{N-2h}{\exp\left(-\frac{r}{q}n^N x\right)}}{1-\exp({-n^N x})},$$ where $\chi$ denotes a Dirichlet character modulo $q$, $N\in 2\mathbb{N}$ and with some restriction on the variable $h$. In the current paper, we investigate the above series for {\it any} $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and $h \in \mathbb{Z}$. We obtain a Dirichlet character analogue of Dixit and the last author's identity and there by derive a two variable generalization of Ramanujan's identity for $\zeta(2m+1)$. Moreover, we establish a new identity for $L(1/3, \chi)$ analogous to Ramanujan's famous identity for $\zeta(1/2)$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools