pith. sign in

arxiv: 2309.12150 · v2 · submitted 2023-09-21 · 🧮 math.CO

Constructing graphs with no independent transversals

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 06:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords independent transversalsgraph partitionsextremal constructionsmaximum degreelist coloring conjectureinduced stars
0
0 comments X

The pith

A systematic method constructs vertex-partitioned graphs that have no independent transversal despite large block sizes relative to maximum degree.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a simple systematic method that produces graphs partitioned into blocks where each block is large compared to the maximum degree, yet no independent set meets every block. This shows that several known sufficient conditions for the existence of an independent transversal are tight. The same method recovers classical extremal examples from the 1990s and 2000s in a uniform way and generates fresh constructions that serve as counterexamples to existing conjectures.

Core claim

The central claim is that there exists a simple systematic method for constructing vertex-partitioned graphs with large block sizes and no independent transversal; this method unifies the earlier constructions of Jin, Yuster, and Szabó-Tardos, produces new minimal degree-two examples, locally sparse examples, smaller counterexamples to Reed's list-coloring conjecture, and a disproof of the Aharoni-Alon-Berger conjecture on graphs without large induced stars.

What carries the argument

The systematic construction method that generates the partitioned graphs without an independent transversal.

If this is right

  • New families of minimal maximum-degree-two graphs with no independent transversal.
  • Locally sparse graphs with no independent transversal that complement asymptotic existence results.
  • Smaller counterexamples to Reed's 1999 list-coloring conjecture.
  • A negative answer to the Aharoni-Holzman-Howard-Sprüssel question on extremal graphs with no independent transversal, while a useful variant of the question holds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may adapt to produce counterexamples for related transversal problems in hypergraphs or matroids.
  • The constructions suggest that similar ratio-based obstructions could appear in other partition problems such as list coloring or choice number bounds.
  • Variations of the method might yield infinite families that separate other parameters in extremal graph theory.

Load-bearing premise

The graphs produced by the method truly lack an independent transversal while keeping the stated block sizes relative to the maximum degree.

What would settle it

Take any concrete graph built by the method, compute its maximum degree and block sizes, then check whether an independent set that intersects every block exists.

read the original abstract

Given a graph $G$ and a partition $P$ of its vertex set, an independent transversal (IT) is an independent set of $G$ that contains one vertex from each block in $P$. Various sufficient conditions for the existence of an IT have been established, and a common theme for many of them is that the block sizes are sufficiently large compared to the maximum degree of $G$. Consequently, there has been interest in constructing graphs with no IT which demonstrate that these bounds on the block sizes are best possible. We describe a simple systematic method for constructing vertex-partitioned graphs with large block sizes and no IT. Unifying previous constructions, we use our method to derive classical extremal constructions due to Jin (1992), Yuster (1997), and Szab\'o and Tardos (2006) in streamlined fashion. For our new results, we describe extremal constructions of minimal graphs with maximum degree two and no IT, generalizing a result of Aharoni, Holzman, Howard, and Spr\"ussel (2015). We construct a family of locally sparse graphs with no IT, complementing an asymptotic result of Loh and Sudakov (2007). We describe new and smaller counterexamples to a list coloring conjecture of Reed (1999), which was originally disproved by Bohman and Holzman (2002). We disprove a conjecture of Aharoni, Alon, and Berger (2016) about IT's in graphs without large induced stars. We answer negatively a question of Aharoni, Holzman, Howard, and Spr\"ussel (2015) about extremal graphs with no IT, but we also prove that a useful variation of their question does hold.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a simple systematic method for constructing vertex-partitioned graphs with large block sizes and no independent transversal (IT). It claims to unify and streamline classical extremal constructions of Jin (1992), Yuster (1997), and Szabó-Tardos (2006), while also providing new results: extremal constructions of minimal graphs with maximum degree 2 and no IT (generalizing Aharoni et al. 2015), a family of locally sparse graphs with no IT (complementing Loh-Sudakov 2007), smaller counterexamples to Reed's 1999 list-coloring conjecture, a disproof of Aharoni-Alon-Berger 2016 on ITs in graphs without large induced stars, and a negative answer to a question of Aharoni et al. 2015 together with a positive result on a variation of that question.

Significance. If the claimed method and constructions are correct, the work would unify and extend the extremal theory of independent transversals, supplying streamlined derivations of known bounds and new counterexamples that resolve or refute several open questions and conjectures in the area.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the method is 'described' and used to 'derive' prior constructions, but the provided text contains only the abstract; without the definition of the method or the explicit constructions, the central claims cannot be verified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their summary of the manuscript, which accurately reflects its contributions in unifying prior constructions and providing new results on independent transversals. The positive assessment of significance is appreciated. No major comments or specific concerns were listed in the report, so we have no points requiring response or revision. We are happy to provide any additional verification of the constructions if that would resolve the 'uncertain' recommendation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; construction paper with no derivational steps shown

full rationale

Only the abstract is available, which describes a systematic construction method that unifies prior results and yields new extremal graphs. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations as load-bearing premises, or ansatzes are present in the provided text, so no step reduces by construction to its own inputs. The paper's claims concern explicit constructions whose validity is independent of any circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no specific free parameters or invented entities; relies on standard combinatorial assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard definitions and properties of graphs, partitions, and independent sets in graph theory.
    The paper operates within classical graph theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5810 in / 1017 out tokens · 30634 ms · 2026-05-24T06:07:18.088918+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.