Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Synchrotron X-ray phase-contrast imaging of ultrasonic drop atomization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.15012 v1 pith:Y6QSYIVA submitted 2023-09-26 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords atomizationdropdropsejectionultrasonicdropletsimagingonset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ultrasonic atomization is employed to generate size-controllable droplets for a variety of applications. Here, we minimize the number of parameters dictating the process by studying the atomization of a single drop pending from an ultrasonic horn. Spatiotemporally resolved X-ray phase-contrast imaging measurements show that the number-median sizes of the ejected droplets can be predicted by the linear Navier-Stokes equations, signifying that the size distribution is controlled by the fluid properties and the driving frequency. Experiments with larger pendant water drops indicate that the fluid-structure interaction plays a pivotal role in determining the ejection onset of the pendant drop. The atomization of viscoelastic drops is dictated by extended ligament formation, entrainment of air, and ejection of drop-encapsulated bubbles. Existing scaling laws are used to explain the required higher input amplitudes for the complete atomization of viscoelastic drops as compared to inviscid drops. Finally, we elucidate the differences between capillary wave-based and cavitation-based atomization and show that inducing cavitation and strong bubble oscillations quickens the onset of daughter drop ejection but impedes their size control.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools