Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Characterizing Semantic Ambiguity of the Materials Science Ontologies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.00078 v2 pith:PIQYLXL4 submitted 2023-09-29 cs.DL

classification cs.DL
keywords materialsontologiesscienceinteroperabilitysemanticambiguityfairmatching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Growth in computational materials science and initiatives such as the Materials Genome Initiative (MGI) and the European Materials Modelling Council (EMMC) has motivated the development and application of ontologies. A key factor has been increased adoption of the FAIR principles, making research data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (Wilkinson et al. 2016). This paper characterizes semantic interoperability among a subset of materials science ontologies in the MatPortal repository. Background context covers semantic interoperability, ontological commitment, and the materials science ontology landscape. The research focused on MatPortal's two interoperability protocols: LOOM term matching and URI matching. Results report the degree of overlap and demonstrate the different types of ambiguity among ontologies. The discussion considers implications for FAIR and AI, and the conclusion highlight key findings and next steps.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools