Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Metadata for Scientific Experiment Reporting: A Case Study in Metal-Organic Frameworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.12417 v1 pith:B57YJ3RV submitted 2023-10-19 cs.DL

classification cs.DL
keywords researchmetadataframeworkreproducibilitysynthesiscasedesignexperiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Research methods and procedures are core aspects of the research process. Metadata focused on these components is critical to supporting the FAIR principles, particularly reproducibility. The research reported on in this paper presents a methodological framework for metadata documentation supporting the reproducibility of research producing Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs). The MOF case study involved natural language processing to extract key synthesis experiment information from a corpus of research literature. Following, a classification activity was performed by domain experts to identify entity-relation pairs. Results include: 1) a research framework for metadata design, 2) a metadata schema that includes nine entities and two relationships for reporting MOF synthesis experiments, and 3) a growing database of MOF synthesis reports structured by our metadata scheme. The metadata schema is intended to support discovery and reproducibility of metal-organic framework research and the FAIR principles. The paper provides background information, identifies the research goals and objectives, research design, results, a discussion, and the conclusion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools