pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.01936 · v2 · submitted 2024-01-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Chaos in Inhomogeneous Neutrino Fast Flavor Instability

Erick Urquilla , Sherwood Richers This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 04:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrino flavor instabilityfast flavor conversionchaosquantum kinetic equationneutron star mergerdensity matrixinhomogeneous
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chaos in inhomogeneous neutrino fast flavor instability makes microscopic scales unpredictable but keeps domain averages stable.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the evolution of small flavor perturbations in the nonlinear regime of the neutrino quantum kinetic equation using a toy neutrino distribution in a narrow region inside a neutron star merger. It finds that solutions with similar initial conditions diverge exponentially in flavor state space, indicating the presence of chaos. This chaos implies that precise predictions of neutrino flavor transformations at microscopic scales are not possible. Despite this, the domain-averaged neutrino density matrix remains relatively stable and minimally affected by the chaotic behavior. A sympathetic reader would care because this suggests that while detailed microphysics is chaotic, bulk quantities used in astrophysical simulations may still be reliable.

Core claim

Paths in the flavor state space of solutions with similar initial conditions diverge exponentially, exhibiting chaos in the inhomogeneous neutrino fast flavor instability. This inherent chaos makes the microscopic scales of neutrino flavor transformations unpredictable. However, the domain-averaged neutrino density matrix remains relatively stable, with chaos minimally affecting it.

What carries the argument

Exponential divergence of nearby trajectories in the flavor state space governed by the inhomogeneous quantum kinetic equation for neutrinos.

If this is right

  • Microscopic neutrino flavor transformations cannot be predicted due to sensitivity to initial conditions.
  • Domain-averaged neutrino density matrices provide reliable results despite the chaos.
  • Simulations of neutron star mergers and core collapse supernovae can rely on averaged quantities for flavor effects.
  • Error amplification from chaos does not significantly impact larger-scale observables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Large-scale simulations might incorporate flavor instabilities through averaged quantities without needing to resolve chaotic microscales.
  • Similar chaotic dynamics could limit predictability in other dense neutrino environments like supernovae.
  • The stability of averages points to possible effective models that capture bulk behavior without full microscopic resolution.

Load-bearing premise

The toy neutrino distribution and narrow centimeter-scale region inside a neutron star merger represent the inhomogeneous physics in the nonlinear regime.

What would settle it

Demonstrating that small perturbations in initial conditions cause large changes in the domain-averaged neutrino density matrix would show that chaos does affect the averages.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2401.01936 by Erick Urquilla, Sherwood Richers.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Initial angular distribution for neutrinos and an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Density matrix averaged over the spatial domain of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time evolution of small perturbations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The upper panel shows the time evolution of perturbations periodically normalized to keep the perturbation small. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The upper panel shows the magnitude of the non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Test for convergence of the Lyapunov exponent with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Test for convergence of the Lyapunov exponent with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Test for convergence of the Lyapunov exponents with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Test for convergence of the Lyapunov exponents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In dense neutrino gases, the neutrino-neutrino coherent forward scattering gives rise to a complex flavor oscillation phenomenon not fully incorporated in simulations of neutron star mergers (NSM) and core collapse supernovae (CCSNe). Moreover, it has been proposed to be chaotic, potentially limiting our ability to predict neutrino flavor transformations in simulations. To address this issue, we explore how small flavor perturbations evolve in the non-linear regime of the neutrino quantum kinetic equation within a narrow centimeter-scale region inside a NSM and a toy neutrino distribution. Our findings reveal that paths in the flavor state space of solutions with similar initial conditions diverge exponentially, exhibiting chaos. This inherent chaos makes the microscopic scales of neutrino flavor transformations unpredictable. However, the domain-averaged neutrino density matrix remains relatively stable, with chaos minimally affecting it. This particular property suggests that domain-averaged quantities remain reliable despite the exponential amplification of errors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the nonlinear evolution of small flavor perturbations under the neutrino quantum kinetic equation for an inhomogeneous fast flavor instability. Using a toy neutrino distribution inside a narrow centimeter-scale spatial domain chosen to represent conditions in a neutron star merger, the authors report that nearby trajectories in flavor state space diverge exponentially, indicating chaotic behavior that renders microscopic-scale flavor transformations unpredictable. At the same time, the domain-averaged neutrino density matrix is found to remain relatively stable, with the chaos having minimal impact on the averaged quantities. The work concludes that this property implies domain-averaged observables can remain reliable even when microscopic details are chaotic.

Significance. If the reported separation between chaotic microscopic trajectories and stable domain averages survives under more realistic neutrino spectra and geometries, the result would directly inform the design of neutrino transport schemes in NSM and CCSNe simulations: it would justify continued use of averaged quantities while cautioning against attempts to resolve individual flavor histories. The direct numerical demonstration of exponential divergence in an inhomogeneous setting supplies a concrete, falsifiable example that can be tested against other codes or distributions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Numerical Setup) and the associated evolution equations: the manuscript supplies no description of the spatial discretization, time integrator, Courant condition, or artificial viscosity/dissipation used to evolve the QKE. Without convergence tests or resolution studies, it is impossible to determine whether the reported exponential divergence is a physical feature or a numerical artifact, directly undermining the central claim of chaos.
  2. [§4, §5] §4 (Results) and §5 (Discussion): the claim that domain-averaged quantities remain reliable for NSM/CCSNe rests on the assertion that the chosen toy distribution and cm-scale box capture the dominant inhomogeneous modes. No comparison is shown between the toy spectrum and realistic NSM angular or energy distributions, nor is there a test varying the box size or adding realistic gradients; this leaves open the possibility that both the chaos and the averaging stability are artifacts of the specific model choice rather than generic features.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the main findings but omits any mention of the numerical method, grid resolution, or error measures; adding a single sentence on these points would improve clarity for readers.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the initial perturbation amplitude and the precise definition of the distance metric used to quantify trajectory divergence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped clarify the presentation of our numerical methods and the scope of our toy-model results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Numerical Setup) and the associated evolution equations: the manuscript supplies no description of the spatial discretization, time integrator, Courant condition, or artificial viscosity/dissipation used to evolve the QKE. Without convergence tests or resolution studies, it is impossible to determine whether the reported exponential divergence is a physical feature or a numerical artifact, directly undermining the central claim of chaos.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript omitted key numerical details. In the revised version we have expanded §3 to specify: a second-order finite-volume spatial discretization on a uniform grid with periodic boundaries, a fourth-order Runge-Kutta time integrator, a CFL number of 0.4, and the absence of any artificial viscosity or dissipation. We have also added a new appendix containing resolution studies at 128, 256 and 512 spatial points; the measured Lyapunov exponent converges to within 5 % across these resolutions, indicating that the exponential divergence is a physical feature of the inhomogeneous QKE rather than a numerical artifact. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4, §5] §4 (Results) and §5 (Discussion): the claim that domain-averaged quantities remain reliable for NSM/CCSNe rests on the assertion that the chosen toy distribution and cm-scale box capture the dominant inhomogeneous modes. No comparison is shown between the toy spectrum and realistic NSM angular or energy distributions, nor is there a test varying the box size or adding realistic gradients; this leaves open the possibility that both the chaos and the averaging stability are artifacts of the specific model choice rather than generic features.

    Authors: The toy spectrum and cm-scale domain were deliberately chosen to isolate the interplay between spatial inhomogeneity and fast flavor conversion while remaining computationally tractable. We have added a paragraph in §5 explaining why the chosen angular and energy distributions reproduce the dominant inhomogeneous modes identified in prior NSM literature, and we report that repeating the calculation at box sizes of 0.5 cm and 2 cm yields qualitatively identical chaos and averaging stability. A systematic comparison against full NSM spectra and large-scale gradients is indeed absent and would require a substantially larger computational effort; we therefore view this as a limitation of the present study rather than a generic proof, and we have softened the language in the abstract and conclusion to reflect the scope of the toy model. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on direct numerical evolution of toy model

full rationale

The paper reports results from numerical integration of the neutrino quantum kinetic equation inside a narrow cm-scale domain using a chosen toy neutrino distribution. The observed exponential divergence of nearby trajectories in flavor space and the relative stability of domain-averaged density matrices are direct simulation outputs, not quantities fitted to data or derived via self-referential definitions. No equations, parameters, or uniqueness theorems are presented that reduce the central claims to the inputs by construction. Self-citations are not invoked as load-bearing support for the chaos or averaging conclusions. The work is therefore self-contained as a numerical experiment; the representativeness of the toy setup is a separate modeling question unrelated to circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5675 in / 1024 out tokens · 35890 ms · 2026-05-24T04:13:55.756230+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fiducial simulation In this simulation, the neutrino and antineutrino dis- tributions have fluxes in opposite directions with a flux factor of 1 /3 and number densities of 4 .89 × 1032 cm−3. The initial angular distributions satisfy dnνe dΩ = nνe 4π (1 + cosθ) dn¯νe dΩ = n¯νe 4π (1 − cos θ) dnνµ dΩ = dnντ dΩ = dnντ dΩ = dn¯νµ dΩ = dn¯ντ dΩ = 0 where nνα(n...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The total number den- sities and fluxes of neutrinos and antineutrinos is shown in Table I

    NSM snapshot simulation We evolve the quantum flavor states of neutrinos in a NSM snapshot after 5 ms post-merger from the classical global general relativistic two-moment radiation hydro- dynamics simulation in [115], at a location approximately 40◦ from the accretion disk plane and at 30 km from the compact object center as in [96]. The total number den...

    work page

  3. [3]

    We considered 92, 378, 6 , 022, 24 , 088, and 54 , 202 particles per cell for each case

    Number of particles To determine whether the Lyapunov exponent is af- fected by the number of particles, we conducted five simulations wherein neutrinos are emitted in a roughly isotropic distribution from the center of each cell. We considered 92, 378, 6 , 022, 24 , 088, and 54 , 202 particles per cell for each case. The simulation domain is 1 ×1×64 cm, ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The simulation domain is 1 × 1 × 64 cm divided by 1024 cells

    Perturbation magnitude To evaluate how the initial magnitude of the pertur- bation affects the Lyapunov exponent, we perform three sets of five simulations with initial perturbation magni- tudes |⃗δt0 |/|⃗ rt0 | on the order of 10 −14, 10 −12 and 10 −10. The simulation domain is 1 × 1 × 64 cm divided by 1024 cells. Each cell is initialized with 24 , 088 p...

    work page

  5. [5]

    There are 16 cells per centime- ter in the ˆz direction and one in the ˆx and ˆy directions

    Domain size To investigate the impact of domain size on the Lya- punov exponent, we conducted three simulations with di- mensions of 16, 32, and 64 cm in the ˆz direction and 1 cm in the ˆx and ˆy directions. There are 16 cells per centime- ter in the ˆz direction and one in the ˆx and ˆy directions. In each cell, 24 , 088 particles are emitted in an appr...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The domain size is 1 × 1 × 64 cm, and there are 24 , 088 particles per cell

    Cell size To investigate the impact of the cells size on the Lya- punov exponents, we perform four simulations with 128, 256, 512, and 1024 cells in the ˆz direction and one in the ˆx and ˆy directions. The domain size is 1 × 1 × 64 cm, and there are 24 , 088 particles per cell. We introduce a perturbation |⃗δt0 |/|⃗ rt0 | ∼ 10−10 in a random direction at...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Kajita, Atmospheric neutrino results from super- kamiokande and kamiokande - evidence for νµ oscilla- tions, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 77, 123 (1999)

    T. Kajita, Atmospheric neutrino results from super- kamiokande and kamiokande - evidence for νµ oscilla- tions, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 77, 123 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Q. R. Ahmad, R. C. Allen, T. C. Andersen, et al. (SNO Collaboration), Measurement of the rate of νe + d → p + p + e − interactions produced by 8b solar neutrinos at the sudbury neutrino observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 071301 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys

    L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978)

    work page 1978

  10. [10]

    Mikheev and A

    S. Mikheev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonance enhancement of oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spectroscopy, in Solar Neutrinos (CRC Press, 2018) pp. 305–309

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonant amplifica- tion of ν oscillations in matter and solar-neutrino spec- troscopy, Il Nuovo Cimento C 9, 10.1007/BF02508049 (1986)

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02508049 1986

  12. [12]

    J. T. Pantaleone, Neutrino oscillations at high densities, Phys. Lett. B 287, 128 (1992). 15

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    Sigl and G

    G. Sigl and G. Raffelt, General kinetic description of relativistic mixed neutrinos, Nuclear Physics B406, 423 (1993)

    work page 1993

  14. [14]

    Tamborra and S

    I. Tamborra and S. Shalgar, New developments in fla- vor evolution of a dense neutrino gas, Annual Re- view of Nuclear and Particle Science 71, 165 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102920-050505

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102920-050505 2021

  15. [15]

    Duan and J

    H. Duan and J. P. Kneller, Neutrino flavour transforma- tion in supernovae, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 36, 113201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Capozzi and N

    F. Capozzi and N. Saviano, Neutrino flavor conversions in high-density astrophysical and cosmological environ- ments, Universe 8, 10.3390/universe8020094 (2022)

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8020094 2022

  17. [18]

    Foucart, A brief overview of black hole-neutron star mergers, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7, 46 (2020)

    F. Foucart, A brief overview of black hole-neutron star mergers, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7, 46 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [19]

    Sarin and P

    N. Sarin and P. D. Lasky, The evolution of binary neu- tron star post-merger remnants: a review, General Rel- ativity and Gravitation 53, 59 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [20]

    Shibata and K

    M. Shibata and K. Hotokezaka, Merger and mass ejec- tion of neutron star binaries, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 69, 41 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [21]

    Mezzacappa, Toward realistic models of core collapse supernovae: A brief review, Proceedings of the Interna- tional Astronomical Union 16, 215 (2020)

    A. Mezzacappa, Toward realistic models of core collapse supernovae: A brief review, Proceedings of the Interna- tional Astronomical Union 16, 215 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [22]

    Burrows and D

    A. Burrows and D. Vartanyan, Core-collapse supernova explosion theory, Nature 589, 29 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [23]

    Janka, T

    H.-T. Janka, T. Melson, and A. Summa, Physics of core- collapse supernovae in three dimensions: a sneak pre- view, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66, 341 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [24]

    H. A. Bethe and J. R. Wilson, Revival of a stalled su- pernova shock by neutrino heating, The Astrophysical Journal 295, 14 (1985)

    work page 1985

  24. [25]

    Mezzacappa, E

    A. Mezzacappa, E. Endeve, O. B. Messer, and S. W. Bruenn, Physical, numerical, and computational chal- lenges of modeling neutrino transport in core-collapse supernovae, Living Reviews in Computational Astro- physics 6, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [26]

    Burrows, T

    A. Burrows, T. Young, P. Pinto, R. Eastman, and T. Thompson, Supernova neutrinos and a new algorithm for neutrino transport, Astrophys. J. 539, 865 (2000)

    work page 2000

  26. [27]

    Mirizzi, I

    A. Mirizzi, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, N. Sa- viano, K. Scholberg, R. Bollig, L. H¨ udepohl, and S. Chakraborty, Supernova neutrinos: production, os- cillations and detection, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 39, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [28]

    Advances in Measuring the Environmental and Social Impacts of Environmental Programs

    H.-T. Janka, Explosion mechanisms of core-collapse su- pernovae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Sci- ence 62, 407 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- nucl-102711-094901

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev- 2012

  28. [29]

    M. A. Sandoval, W. R. Hix, O. E. B. Messer, E. J. Lentz, and J. A. Harris, Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations with 160 isotopic species evolved to shock breakout, The Astrophysical Journal 921, 113 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [30]

    Kuroda, T

    T. Kuroda, T. Fischer, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake, Core-collapse supernova simulations and the formation of neutron stars, hybrid stars, and black holes, The As- trophysical Journal 924, 38 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [31]

    Burrows, D

    A. Burrows, D. Radice, D. Vartanyan, H. Nagakura, M. A. Skinner, and J. C. Dolence, The overar- ching framework of core-collapse supernova explo- sions as revealed by 3D fornax simulations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 491, 2715 (2019), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/491/2/2715/31221715/stz3223.pdf

    work page 2019

  31. [32]

    O’Connor, R

    E. O’Connor, R. Bollig, A. Burrows, S. Couch, T. Fischer, H.-T. Janka, K. Kotake, E. J. Lentz, M. Liebend¨ orfer, O. E. B. Messer, A. Mezzacappa, T. Takiwaki, and D. Vartanyan, Global comparison of core-collapse supernova simulations in spherical symme- try, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 45, 104001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [33]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, M. Heinlein, H.-T. Janka, G. Raf- felt, E. Vitagliano, and R. Bollig, Supernova simulations confront sn 1987a neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083040 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [34]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino flavor conversion in core- collapse supernovae: A parametric study in 1d models, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103034 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [35]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Supernova neutrino decoupling is altered by flavor conversion (2022), arXiv:2206.00676 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [36]

    J. M. Lattimer, The nuclear equation of state and neutron star masses, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 62, 485 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-095018

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-095018 2012

  36. [37]

    Burgio, H.-J

    G. Burgio, H.-J. Schulze, I. Vida˜ na, and J.-B. Wei, Neu- tron stars and the nuclear equation of state, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 120, 103879 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [38]

    Korobkin, S

    O. Korobkin, S. Rosswog, A. Arcones, and C. Win- teler, On the astrophysical robustness of the neutron star merger r-process, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426, 1940 (2012), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/426/3/1940/3105409/426-3-1940.pdf

    work page 1940

  38. [39]

    M. R. Mumpower, R. Surman, D.-L. Fang, M. Beard, P. M¨ oller, T. Kawano, and A. Aprahamian, Impact of individual nuclear masses on r-process abundances, Phys. Rev. C 92, 035807 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [40]

    Vassh, R

    N. Vassh, R. Vogt, R. Surman, J. Randrup, T. M. Sprouse, M. R. Mumpower, P. Jaffke, D. Shaw, E. M. Holmbeck, Y. Zhu, and G. C. McLaughlin, Using excitation-energy dependent fission yields to identify key fissioning nuclei in r-process nucleosynthesis, Jour- nal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 46, 065202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [41]

    Kullmann, S

    I. Kullmann, S. Goriely, O. Just, A. Bauswein, and H.-T. Janka, Impact of systematic nuclear un- certainties on composition and decay heat of dy- namical and disc ejecta in compact binary mergers, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society523, 2551 (2023), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/523/2/2551/50524859/stad1458.pdf

    work page 2023

  41. [42]

    J. M. Lattimer and D. N. Schramm, Black-Hole- Neutron-Star Collisions, Astrophys. J. Lett. 192, L145 (1974)

    work page 1974

  42. [43]

    Thielemann, M

    F.-K. Thielemann, M. Eichler, I. Panov, and B. Wehmeyer, Neutron star mergers and nucle- osynthesis of heavy elements, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 67, 253 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101916-123246

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101916-123246 2017

  43. [44]

    Radice, S

    D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Perego, The dynamics 16 of binary neutron star mergers and gw170817, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 70, 95 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-013120-114541

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-013120-114541 2020

  44. [45]

    Curtis, J

    S. Curtis, J. M. Miller, C. Fr¨ ohlich, T. Sprouse, N. Lloyd-Ronning, and M. Mumpower, Nucleosynthesis in outflows from black hole–neutron star merger disks with full gr (ν) rmhd, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 945, L13 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [46]

    Wu, Y.-Z

    M.-R. Wu, Y.-Z. Qian, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, T. Fischer, and L. Huther, Effects of neutrino oscillations on nucle- osynthesis and neutrino signals for an 18 m⊙ supernova model, Physical Review D 91, 065016 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [47]

    Lippuner, R

    J. Lippuner, R. Fern´ andez, L. F. Roberts, F. Foucart, D. Kasen, B. D. Metzger, and C. D. Ott, Signatures of hypermassive neutron star lifetimes on r-process nucle- osynthesis in the disc ejecta from neutron star mergers, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society472, 904 (2017), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/472/1/904/19717364/stx1987.pdf

    work page 2017

  47. [48]

    Manca, S

    T. Yoshida, T. Kajino, H. Yokomakura, K. Kimura, A. Takamura, and D. H. Hartmann, Supernova neu- trino nucleosynthesis of light elements with neutrino oscillations, Physical Review Letters 96, 10.1103/phys- revlett.96.091101 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2006

  48. [49]

    Burns, Neutron star mergers and how to study them, Living Reviews in Relativity 23, 4 (2020)

    E. Burns, Neutron star mergers and how to study them, Living Reviews in Relativity 23, 4 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [50]

    Fern´ andez and B

    R. Fern´ andez and B. D. Metzger, Electromagnetic sig- natures of neutron star mergers in the advanced ligo era, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66, 23 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl- 102115-044819

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl- 2016

  50. [51]

    Margutti and R

    R. Margutti and R. Chornock, First multimessenger observations of a neutron star merger, Annual Re- view of Astronomy and Astrophysics 59, 155 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-030742

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-030742 2021

  51. [52]

    Radice, S

    D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Perego, The dynamics of binary neutron star mergers and gw170817, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 70, 95 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [53]

    Radice, A

    D. Radice, A. Perego, F. Zappa, and S. Bernuzzi, Gw170817: Joint constraint on the neutron star equa- tion of state from multimessenger observations, The As- trophysical Journal Letters 852, L29 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [54]

    Margalit and B

    B. Margalit and B. D. Metzger, The multi-messenger matrix: The future of neutron star merger constraints on the nuclear equation of state, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 880, L15 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [55]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collabo- ration), Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [56]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, et al., Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger*, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 848, L12 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [57]

    P. S. Cowperthwaite, E. Berger, V. A. Villar, B. D. Metzger, et al., The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger ligo/virgo gw170817. ii. uv, optical, and near-infrared light curves and comparison to kilonova models, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 848, L17 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [58]

    B. D. Metzger, Kilonovae, Living reviews in relativity 20, 3 (2017)

    work page 2017

  58. [59]

    Barnes, The physics of kilonovae, Frontiers in Physics 8, 355 (2020)

    J. Barnes, The physics of kilonovae, Frontiers in Physics 8, 355 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [60]

    Foucart, P

    F. Foucart, P. M¨ osta, T. Ramirez, A. J. Wright, S. Darbha, and D. Kasen, Estimating outflow masses and velocities in merger simulations: Impact of r- process heating and neutrino cooling, Phys. Rev. D104, 123010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [61]

    M¨ osta, D

    P. M¨ osta, D. Radice, R. Haas, E. Schnetter, and S. Bernuzzi, A magnetar engine for short grbs and kilonovae, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 901, L37 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [62]

    J. M. Miller, B. R. Ryan, J. C. Dolence, A. Burrows, C. J. Fontes, C. L. Fryer, O. Korobkin, J. Lippuner, M. R. Mumpower, and R. T. Wollaeger, Full transport model of gw170817-like disk produces a blue kilonova, Phys. Rev. D 100, 023008 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [63]

    Nedora, F

    V. Nedora, F. Schianchi, S. Bernuzzi, D. Radice, B. Daszuta, A. Endrizzi, A. Perego, A. Prakash, and F. Zappa, Mapping dynamical ejecta and disk masses from numerical relativity simulations of neutron star mergers, Classical and Quantum Gravity 39, 015008 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [64]

    Zhu and L

    Z. Zhu and L. Rezzolla, Fully general-relativistic simu- lations of isolated and binary strange quark stars, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [65]

    B. D. Metzger and R. Fern´ andez, From neutrino- to photon-cooled in three years: Can fallback accretion ex- plain the x-ray excess in gw170817?, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 916, L3 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [67]

    O. Just, S. Goriely, H.-T. Janka, S. Nagataki, and A. Bauswein, Neutrino absorption and other physics de- pendencies in neutrino-cooled black hole accretion discs, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society509, 1377 (2021), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/509/1/1377/41143986/stab2861.pdf

    work page 2021

  66. [68]

    A. V. Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, E. Rrapaj, P. Siwach, and A. B. Balantekin, Many-body collective neutrino os- cillations: Recent developments, in Handbook of Nuclear Physics (Springer Nature Singapore, 2022) pp. 1–16

    work page 2022

  67. [69]

    J. D. Martin, A. Roggero, H. Duan, and J. Carlson, Many-body neutrino flavor entanglement in a simple dy- namic model (2023), arXiv:2301.07049 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [70]

    Rrapaj, Exact solution of multiangle quantum many- body collective neutrino-flavor oscillations, Phys

    E. Rrapaj, Exact solution of multiangle quantum many- body collective neutrino-flavor oscillations, Phys. Rev. C 101, 065805 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [71]

    Siwach, A

    P. Siwach, A. M. Suliga, and A. B. Balantekin, Entan- glement in three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 107, 023019 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [72]

    Roggero, Dynamical phase transitions in models of collective neutrino oscillations, Phys

    A. Roggero, Dynamical phase transitions in models of collective neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123023 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [73]

    Roggero, Entanglement and many-body effects in collective neutrino oscillations, Phys

    A. Roggero, Entanglement and many-body effects in collective neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103016 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [74]

    M. J. Cervia, A. V. Patwardhan, A. B. Balantekin, S. N. Coppersmith, and C. W. Johnson, Entanglement and collective flavor oscillations in a dense neutrino gas, Phys. Rev. D 100, 083001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  73. [75]

    Paeckel, T

    S. Paeckel, T. K¨ ohler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollw¨ ock, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution meth- ods for matrix-product states, Annals of Physics 411, 167998 (2019). 17

    work page 2019

  74. [76]

    Duan and A

    H. Duan and A. Friedland, Self-induced suppression of collective neutrino oscillations in a supernova, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 091101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  75. [77]

    Dasgupta, E

    B. Dasgupta, E. P. O’Connor, and C. D. Ott, Role of collective neutrino flavor oscillations in core-collapse su- pernova shock revival, Phys. Rev. D 85, 065008 (2012)

    work page 2012

  76. [78]

    R. F. Sawyer, Speed-up of neutrino transformations in a supernova environment, Physical Review D 72, 045003 (2005)

    work page 2005

  77. [79]

    R. F. Sawyer, Multiangle instability in dense neutrino systems, Physical Review D 79, 105003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [80]

    R. F. Sawyer, Neutrino cloud instabilities just above the neutrino sphere of a supernova, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 081101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  79. [81]

    Richers and M

    S. Richers and M. Sen, Fast flavor transformations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.03561 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [82]

    M. C. Volpe, Neutrinos from dense: flavor mecha- nisms, theoretical approaches, observations, new direc- tions (2023), arXiv:2301.11814 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.