Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Vulnerability Webs: Systemic Risk in Software Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13375 v3 pith:QCUCRPHE submitted 2024-02-20 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords vulnerabilitycodedependenciesdependencysoftwareacrossai-assistedalternative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Software development relies on code reuse to minimize costs, creating vulnerability risks through dependencies with substantial economic impact, as seen in the Crowdstrike and HeartBleed incidents. We analyze 52,897 dependencies across 16,102 Python repositories using a strategic network formation model incorporating observable and unobservable heterogeneity. Through variational approximation of conditional distributions, we demonstrate that dependency creation generates negative externalities. Vulnerability propagation, modeled as a contagion process, shows that popular protection heuristics are ineffective. AI-assisted coding, on the other hand, offers an effective alternative by enabling dependency replacement with in-house code.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools