Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Influence of Personality and Communication Behavior of a Conversational Agent on User Experience and Social Presence in Augmented Reality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.09883 v1 pith:NOJYK7D6 submitted 2024-03-14 cs.HC

Katerina Koleva , Maurizio Vergari , Tanja Kojić , Sebastian Möller , Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords agentexperienceuseraugmentedbehaviorbodyconversationalinfluence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A virtual embodiment can benefit conversational agents, but it is unclear how their personalities and non-verbal behavior influence the User Experience and Social Presence in Augmented Reality (AR). We asked 30 users to converse with a virtual assistant who gives recommendations about city activities. The participants interacted with two different personalities: Sammy, a cheerful blue mouse, and Olive, a serious green human-like agent. Each was presented with two body languages - happy/friendly and annoyed/unfriendly. We conclude how agent representation and humor affect User Experience aspects, and that body language is significant in the evaluation and perception of the AR agent.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Talking to...uh...um...Machines: The Impact of Disfluent Speech Agents on Partner Models and Perspective Taking

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Namer-Matcher experiment with 56 people found that a disfluent speech agent was rated as more competent after interaction than a fluent one, while disfluency's effect on perspective-taking language stayed uncertain.

Pith tools