Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Grouping of $N-1$ Contingencies for Controller Synthesis: A Study for Power Line Failures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.07415 v1 pith:M2SR2TGV submitted 2024-04-11 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords contingenciescontingencycontrollerpowerperformancegroupsnumberstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of maintaining power system stability and performance after the failure of any single line in a power system (an "N-1 contingency") is investigated. Due to the large number of possible N-1 contingencies for a power network, it is impractical to optimize controller parameters for each possible contingency a priori. A method to partition a set of contingencies into groups of contingencies that are similar to each other from a control perspective is presented. Design of a single controller for each group, rather than for each contingency, provides a computationally tractable method for maintaining stability and performance after element failures. The choice of number of groups tunes a trade-off between computation time and controller performance for a given set of contingencies. Results are simulated on the IEEE 39-bus and 68-bus systems, illustrating that, with controllers designed for a relatively small number of groups, power system stability may be significantly improved after an N-1 contingency compared to continued use of the nominal controller. Furthermore, performance is comparable to that of controllers designed for each contingency individually.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools