Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Spatially constrained vs. unconstrained filtering in neural spatiospectral filters for multichannel speech enhancement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11376 v1 pith:XYMGJGRY submitted 2024-06-17 eess.AS

classification eess.AS
keywords spatialneuralcuesenhancementfilteringmultichannelsignalspeech
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

When using artificial neural networks for multichannel speech enhancement, filtering is often achieved by estimating a complex-valued mask that is applied to all or one reference channel of the input signal. The estimation of this mask is based on the noisy multichannel signal and, hence, can exploit spatial and spectral cues simultaneously. While it has been shown that exploiting spatial and spectral cues jointly is beneficial for the speech enhancement result, the mechanics of the interplay of the two inside the neural network are still largely unknown. In this contribution, we investigate how two conceptually different neural spatiospectral filters (NSSFs) exploit spatial cues depending on the training target signal and show that, while one NSSF always performs spatial filtering, the other one is selective in leveraging spatial information depending on the task at hand. These insights provide better understanding of the information the NSSFs use to make their prediction and, thus, allow to make informed decisions regarding their design and deployment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools