Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Interpretable meta-analysis of model or marker performance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13458 v1 pith:R5PP5H4J submitted 2024-09-20 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords modelperformanceanalysiscontextdatasourcesdefinedinterpretablemeta
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Conventional meta analysis of model performance conducted using datasources from different underlying populations often result in estimates that cannot be interpreted in the context of a well defined target population. In this manuscript we develop methods for meta-analysis of several measures of model performance that are interpretable in the context of a well defined target population when the populations underlying the datasources used in the meta analysis are heterogeneous. This includes developing identifiablity conditions, inverse-weighting, outcome model, and doubly robust estimator. We illustrate the methods using simulations and data from two large lung cancer screening trials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools