pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.13813 · v3 · submitted 2024-09-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

An ancient system hidden in the Galactic plane?

Federico Sestito , Emma Fernandez-Alvar , Rebecca Brooks , Emma Olson , Leticia Carigi , Paula Jofre , Danielle de Brito Silva , Camilla J.L. Eldridge
show 14 more authors
Sara Vitali Kim A. Venn Vanessa Hill Anke Ardern-Arentsen Georges Kordopatis Nicolas F. Martin Julio F. Navarro Else Starkenburg Patricia B. Tissera Pascale Jablonka Carmela Lardo Romain Lucchesi Tobias Buck Alexia Amayo
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords very metal-poor starsplanar orbitschemical abundancesaccreted systemsMilky Way halodwarf galaxiesstellar kinematicsGalactic plane
0
0 comments X

The pith

Twenty very metal-poor stars on planar orbits share chemical patterns from one early-accreted dwarf-like system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies high-resolution spectra of 20 very metal-poor stars within 2 kpc of the Sun that move on orbits staying within about 4 kpc of the Galactic plane, including both stars that orbit with the Galaxy's rotation and those that orbit against it. These stars show matching patterns of element ratios produced by high-energy supernovae, fast-rotating massive stars, and neutron-star mergers, with no detectable chemical differences between the prograde and retrograde groups and with overall abundances that match stars in classical dwarf galaxies. The low chemical scatter inside the sample and its clear separation from the rest of the halo population lead the authors to conclude that the stars formed inside a single homogeneous environment that was accreted early by the Milky Way, after which dynamical evolution placed members on both types of planar orbits. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies direct evidence for a previously unrecognized building block in the Milky Way's assembly that sits hidden inside the plane rather than in the more easily studied outer halo.

Core claim

The 20 stars display enrichment from high-energy supernovae and hypernovae up to the iron peak together with contributions from fast-rotating massive stars and neutron-star mergers for neutron-capture elements. Their [Sr, Ba, Eu/Fe] ratios match those found in classical dwarf galaxies. No significant chemical differences appear between the 11 prograde and 9 retrograde members. Chemical dispersion inside the sample remains low, and the stars separate cleanly from the non-planar halo population. The same kinematic cuts applied to an independent dataset reproduce the same chemical peculiarities. These observations indicate that the stars formed in an environment that experienced homogeneous, dw

What carries the argument

Kinematic selection of high-eccentricity planar orbits (maximum height ≲4 kpc) combined with chemical-abundance homogeneity to isolate a single accreted progenitor.

If this is right

  • The planar very metal-poor population is chemically distinct from both the observed halo and other known Galactic structures.
  • Early accretion of one system can naturally populate both prograde and retrograde planar orbits through later dynamical evolution.
  • Multiple accretion events are still required to explain the full range of chemo-dynamical properties seen among all planar very metal-poor stars.
  • The progenitor experienced chemical evolution that remained homogeneous and similar to that inside classical dwarf galaxies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Targeted spectroscopic follow-up of additional stars selected only by planar kinematics and low metallicity could reveal more members of the same structure.
  • The existence of such a system would require Milky Way formation models to keep some accreted material on low-height orbits rather than ejecting it to the outer halo.
  • Kinematic surveys that classify stars as disk members solely by low vertical motion may be mixing in ancient accreted stars that happen to lie near the plane.

Load-bearing premise

The low chemical dispersion, absence of prograde versus retrograde differences, and separation from the non-planar halo are enough to prove the twenty stars came from one single homogeneous progenitor rather than several similar but independent accretion events.

What would settle it

A larger sample of planar very metal-poor stars that shows substantial chemical scatter or a continuous chemical sequence linking them to the general halo population would indicate multiple distinct progenitors instead of one.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.13813 by Alexia Amayo, Anke Ardern-Arentsen, Camilla J.L. Eldridge, Carmela Lardo, Danielle de Brito Silva, Else Starkenburg, Emma Fernandez-Alvar, Emma Olson, Federico Sestito, Georges Kordopatis, Julio F. Navarro, Kim A. Venn, Leticia Carigi, Nicolas F. Martin, Pascale Jablonka, Patricia B. Tissera, Paula Jofre, Rebecca Brooks, Romain Lucchesi, Sara Vitali, Tobias Buck, Vanessa Hill.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example of the ESPaDOnS spectra. Top panel: the Mg i Triplet region, which also includes several Fe and Ti lines. Vertical short lines mark the position of Mg i, Ti, and Fe lines found in most of the targets. Central left panel: the Si i 3905.523 Å line region. Central right: the Sr ii 4077.709 Å line region. Bottom left: the Ba ii 4554.029 Å line region. Bottom right: the Na i Doublet λλ5889.951, 5895.924… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Orbital parameters. Left panels: Current Galactocentric positions, Y vs X (top left), Z vs X (centre left), and Z vs Y (bottom left). Red squares and coral circles denote the prograde and retrograde targets, respectively. J110847.18+253047.2 is marked with a black circle (the star with the highest maximum height from the plane). Green circle represents the position of the Sun, (X, Y, Z)⊙ = (8.3, 0.0, 0.0) … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Kiel diagram. Targets are colour-coded by metallicity. Retrograde and prograde stars are denoted by squares and cir￾cles, respectively. A Padova isochrone (Bressan et al. 2012) of [Fe/H] = −2.0 (dark olive dashed line) is shown for comparison. 4.2. Spectral line list, atomic data, and model atmosphere The line list and the atomic data are sourced from line￾make (Placco et al. 2021), which includes hyper-fi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Carbon synthesis. Top panel: The ESPaDOnS spectrum of J225724.46+385951.0 is represented by the blue line, while synthetic spectra are shown by the black ([C/Fe] = +0.50), red ([C/Fe] = +0.7, best fit), and olive ([C/Fe] = +1.00) lines. Bot￾tom panel: Residuals of the fits. The horizontal dotted lines mark the null difference (blue) and the dispersion around the contin￾uum (±0.05 dex, black). The residuals… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Chemical abundances as a function of [Fe/H]. Prograde and retrograde targets are marked with red squares and coral circles, respectively. MW halo from SAGA database (Suda et al. 2008) and Li et al. (2022) are denoted by smaller and larger grey circles, respectively. All datasets are in LTE. Halo stars have been selected to have a similar distribution in the stellar parameters as our targets for a more robu… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Circular NJ tree built using the distances of 14 chemical abundances of stars in the dataset. Tips represent individual stars (see table online for ID to LAMOST name match). The tree is annotated with abundance ([Al/Fe], [Co/Fe], [Ba/Fe], [Sr/Fe], [C/Fe]) and Zmax values for each star. To account for the influence of uncertainties on branch￾ing analysis, the nodal support, or confidence in each branching p… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of α-capture (left) and Fe-peak (right) tree. Dashed lines connect the same stars in each tree. Robinson-Foulds (RF) distances. This is a normalised value between 0 (identical) and 1 (totally different) and compares the frequency of nodes that appears in both trees. Follow￾ing de Brito Silva et al. (2024), the distance matrix has been perturbed 1000 times to take uncertainties in [X/Fe] into acc… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ratios of the Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) as a function of the chemical species. The vertical axis is in logarithmic scale. Targets discussed in Section 5.2 have been removed. Stars from the halo (Li et al. 2022), bulge (Howes et al. 2014, 2015, 2016; Koch et al. 2016; Reggiani et al. 2020; Lucey et al. 2022; Sestito et al. 2023a, 2024b) or dwarf galaxies (from SAGA, Suda et al. 2008) are selected from… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Star formation rate (SFR) of Loki as a function of time (bottom x-axis, black line) and of metallicity (top x-axis, blue line). channel, from SNe II only, for evolutionary times lower than ∼ 1 Gyr. Our derived upper mass limit for the SNe II is Mup = 55 ± 2 M⊙. The upper mass Mup is strictly linked to the gas mass available to form stars in each burst (Carigi & Hernandez 2008), hence to the SFR. Using the … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Neutron-capture elements. Left panel: [Sr/Fe] vs [Fe/H]. Central panel: [Ba/Fe] vs [Fe/H]. Empty symbols denote upper limits on the vertical axis. Right panel: [Sr/Ba] vs [Ba/Fe]. MW stars (grey circles) are from SAGA (Suda et al. 2008); Coma Berenice (ComBer) stars are from Frebel et al. (2010) and Waller et al. (2023); Bootes I (BooI) stars are from Feltzing et al. (2009), Norris et al. (2010), Gilmore … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Rapid and slow processes. Loki members are divided into prograde (red squares) and retrograde (coral circles) orbits. The red line represents the evolution of these ratios from the CEM described in Section 6.1. Top panel: [Ba/Mg] vs [Mg/H]. Fnx stars (black squares) are from Letarte et al. (2010); UMi stars (black circles) are from Shetrone et al. (2001), Sadakane et al. (2004), Cohen & Huang (2010), Kirb… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The action space. The x-axis is the azimuthal component of the action (equal to Lz), while the y-axis is the difference between the vertical and the radial action. Both axes are normalised by the total action, defined as Jtot = Jr+Jz+|Jϕ|. Red squares and coral circles denote Loki stars in prograde and retrograde motion, respectively. The black circle indicates the non-member J110847.18+253047.2. Left pan… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: [α/Fe] vs [Fe/H]. Prograde and retrograde Loki’ stars are marked by red squares and coral circles, respectively. Lit￾erature prograde planars (black squares) are from Sestito et al. (2019), Cordoni et al. (2021), Dovgal et al. (2024), Fernández￾Alvar et al. (2024), Sestito et al. (2024b), and Zhang et al. (2024b); literature retrograde planars (black circles) are from Sestito et al. (2019), Cordoni et al.… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyse high signal-to-noise ESPaDOnS/CFHT spectra of 20 very metal-poor stars (VMP; [Fe/H]~$<-2.0$) in the solar neighbourhood (within $\sim2$ kpc), selected to be on planar orbits with maximum heights $\lesssim4$ kpc. The sample comprises 11 stars on prograde and 9 on retrograde orbits, all with relatively high eccentricities (0.5--0.9).Their chemical abundance patterns indicate enrichment from high-energy supernovae and hypernovae up to the Fe-peak, and contributions from fast-rotating massive stars and neutron star mergers for the neutron-capture elements. No significant chemical differences are found between prograde and retrograde stars. The [Sr, Ba, Eu/Fe] ratios resemble those of stars in classical dwarfs galaxies. Chemical dispersion and distance analyses further highlight the internal similarity of the sample and its separation from the bulk of the observed, non-planar halo population. Applying the same kinematical selection to another homogeneous dataset yields consistent results, confirming that this group of planar VMP stars exhibit peculiar chemical properties distinct from those of the observed halo and other known Galactic structures. These findings suggest that the stars formed in an environment that experienced a homogeneous chemical evolution akin to that of dwarf galaxies. A plausible scenario, supported by cosmological zoom-in simulations, is the early accretion of a single system whose subsequent dynamical evolution naturally produced stars on both prograde and retrograde planar orbits. If this interpretation is correct, we tentatively refer to this putative progenitor as \textit{Loki}. However, comparisons with other planar VMP stars spanning a wider range of chemo-dynamical properties indicate that multiple accretion events likely contributed to this diverse population orbiting close to the Galactic plane.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes high-S/N spectra of 20 VMP stars ([Fe/H] < -2) within ~2 kpc on planar orbits (z_max ≲ 4 kpc), split into 11 prograde and 9 retrograde with eccentricities 0.5-0.9. Abundance patterns show enrichment by high-energy SNe/hypernovae to the Fe-peak and by FRMS/NSMs for neutron-capture elements, with no significant prograde/retrograde differences and [Sr/Ba/Eu/Fe] ratios resembling classical dwarfs. Internal chemical dispersion and distance metrics separate the sample from the non-planar halo; the same kinematic cut on another dataset yields consistent results. The authors interpret this as evidence for a homogeneous dwarf-galaxy-like chemical evolution, plausibly from early accretion of a single system (tentatively named Loki) whose dynamics produced both orbital directions, while noting that wider comparisons suggest multiple accretion events contributed to the planar VMP population.

Significance. If the homogeneity and single-progenitor interpretation hold, the result would link a chemically distinct planar VMP population to early dwarf-galaxy accretion and dynamical evolution, providing a concrete observational anchor for cosmological zoom-in simulations of Milky Way assembly. The work supplies reproducible abundance measurements and a falsifiable kinematic selection criterion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / concluding discussion] Abstract and concluding discussion: The central claim that the 20 stars share a single homogeneous progenitor is load-bearing, yet the manuscript itself states that 'comparisons with other planar VMP stars spanning a wider range of chemo-dynamical properties indicate that multiple accretion events likely contributed.' No quantitative test (e.g., orbital clustering statistic, mixture-model likelihood ratio, or dispersion comparison against simulated multi-event debris) is supplied to assess whether the observed chemical and kinematic coherence favors one system over several similar dwarfs.
  2. [Sample selection and chemical analysis] Sample and analysis sections: The homogeneity conclusion rests on chemical dispersion plus distance separation from the non-planar halo, but the provided description lacks a full error budget on the abundance ratios, explicit selection-function modeling for the planar cut, and a statistical comparison (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Anderson-Darling test) against the broader halo population that would make the separation claim robust.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the tentative progenitor name 'Loki' should be introduced with a clear caveat that it is conditional on the single-system interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / concluding discussion] Abstract and concluding discussion: The central claim that the 20 stars share a single homogeneous progenitor is load-bearing, yet the manuscript itself states that 'comparisons with other planar VMP stars spanning a wider range of chemo-dynamical properties indicate that multiple accretion events likely contributed.' No quantitative test (e.g., orbital clustering statistic, mixture-model likelihood ratio, or dispersion comparison against simulated multi-event debris) is supplied to assess whether the observed chemical and kinematic coherence favors one system over several similar dwarfs.

    Authors: We agree that the wording in the abstract and concluding discussion requires clarification to avoid any implication that all planar VMP stars originate from a single system. The manuscript's interpretation is that the specific group of 20 stars shows chemical homogeneity and dwarf-galaxy-like patterns consistent with one progenitor (Loki), while explicitly noting that wider comparisons indicate multiple events for the broader population. We will revise both sections to make this distinction sharper and to qualify the single-progenitor scenario as tentative and sample-specific. Regarding quantitative tests, the current evidence rests on measured chemical dispersions, distance metrics, and consistency checks with an independent dataset. We acknowledge that a mixture-model likelihood ratio or comparison to simulated multi-event debris would be a useful addition; however, the modest sample size limits the power of such tests without new simulations. We will add a brief discussion of this limitation and, if space permits, include a simple internal dispersion comparison against literature halo samples. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Sample selection and chemical analysis] Sample and analysis sections: The homogeneity conclusion rests on chemical dispersion plus distance separation from the non-planar halo, but the provided description lacks a full error budget on the abundance ratios, explicit selection-function modeling for the planar cut, and a statistical comparison (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Anderson-Darling test) against the broader halo population that would make the separation claim robust.

    Authors: We accept that the separation and homogeneity claims would be more robust with these additions. In the revised manuscript we will expand the chemical analysis section to include a complete error budget (incorporating both random and systematic uncertainties on the abundance ratios), provide an explicit description of the kinematic selection function used for the planar cut, and perform Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling tests comparing the sample's abundance distributions to the non-planar halo population. These changes will be presented alongside the existing dispersion and distance metrics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational comparison to external dwarf-galaxy data and simulations; no internal derivation reduces to fitted inputs

full rationale

The manuscript is an observational study: it selects 20 VMP stars by kinematics, measures abundances from spectra, reports no prograde/retrograde chemical differences, notes resemblance to classical dwarf galaxies, and offers a tentative single-progenitor interpretation while explicitly stating that wider comparisons favor multiple accretion events. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to derive the central claim from the sample itself; all quantitative statements rest on direct measurements compared against independent external datasets and simulations. This satisfies the default expectation of no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The interpretation relies on standard assumptions about nucleosynthesis channels and the chemical distinctiveness of dwarf galaxies; the entity Loki is introduced without independent falsifiable predictions beyond the current sample.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Abundance patterns from high-energy SNe, hypernovae, fast-rotating massive stars, and NS mergers are diagnostic of dwarf-galaxy chemical evolution.
    Invoked to link the observed [Sr, Ba, Eu/Fe] ratios to a homogeneous progenitor environment.
invented entities (1)
  • Loki no independent evidence
    purpose: Putative single accreted progenitor system
    Introduced as a tentative label for the hypothesized common origin; no independent evidence such as a predicted mass or location is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5955 in / 1317 out tokens · 25857 ms · 2026-05-23T20:52:42.434961+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 163 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Navarro, J

    Abadi, M. G., Navarro, J. F., Steinmetz, M., & Eke, V. R. 2003, ApJ, 597, 21 Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    S., Youakim, K., González Hernández, J

    Aguado, D. S., Youakim, K., González Hernández, J. I., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 2241

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    R., et al

    Almeida-Fernandes, F., SamPedro, L., Herpich, F. R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 4590

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    C., Christlieb, N., et al

    Aoki, W., Beers, T. C., Christlieb, N., et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 492

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    M., Christensen, C

    Applebaum, E., Brooks, A. M., Christensen, C. R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 906, 96

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    M., Lee, Y

    Arentsen, A., Placco, V. M., Lee, Y. S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 4082

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    1999, ApJ, 525, 886

    Arlandini, C., Käppeler, F., Wisshak, K., et al. 1999, ApJ, 525, 886

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481 Barbá, R. H., Minniti, D., Geisler, D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, L24

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Beers, T. C. & Christlieb, N. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 531

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    C., Drilling, J

    Beers, T. C., Drilling, J. S., Rossi, S., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 931

    work page 2002

  11. [11]

    2024, A&A, 683, A136

    Bellazzini, M., Massari, D., Ceccarelli, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A136

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    W., Koposov, S

    Belokurov, V., Erkal, D., Evans, N. W., Koposov, S. E., & Deason, A. J. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 611

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    & Kravtsov, A

    Belokurov, V. & Kravtsov, A. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 689

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    2019, The Messenger, 175, 35

    Bensby, T., Bergemann, M., Rybizki, J., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 35

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    2011, MNRAS, 413, 2184

    Bergemann, M. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2184

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    & Cescutti, G

    Bergemann, M. & Cescutti, G. 2010, A&A, 522, A9

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    M., et al

    Bergemann, M., Collet, R., Amarsi, A. M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 847, 15

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    J., Eitner, P., et al

    Bergemann, M., Gallagher, A. J., Eitner, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A80

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    2013, ApJ, 764, 115

    Bergemann, M., Kudritzki, R.-P., Würl, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 115

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    C., & Gehren, T

    Bergemann, M., Pickering, J. C., & Gehren, T. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1334

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    2014, ApJ, 787, 10

    Bisterzo, S., Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Wiescher, M., & Käppeler, F. 2014, ApJ, 787, 10

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    & Gerhard, O

    Bland-Hawthorn, J. & Gerhard, O. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 529

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    1999, MNRAS, 309, 533

    Bonifacio, P., Centurion, M., & Molaro, P. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 533

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    2009, A&A, 501, 519

    Bonifacio, P., Spite, M., Cayrel, R., et al. 2009, A&A, 501, 519

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    2012, MNRAS, 427, 127

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    V., et al

    Buck, T., Obreja, A., Macciò, A. V., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3461

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Bullock, J. S. & Johnston, K. V. 2005, ApJ, 635, 931

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    2011, Nature, 477, 67

    Caffau, E., Bonifacio, P., François, P., et al. 2011, Nature, 477, 67

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    & Hernandez, X

    Carigi, L. & Hernandez, X. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 582

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    J., Fattahi, A., Callingham, T

    Carrillo, A., Deason, A. J., Fattahi, A., Callingham, T. M., & Grand, R. J. J. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2165

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    2021, ApJ, 908, 208

    Carter, C., Conroy, C., Zaritsky, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 208

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    2004, A&A, 416, 1117

    Cayrel, R., Depagne, E., Spite, M., et al. 2004, A&A, 416, 1117

    work page 2004

  33. [33]

    J., Moles, M., Cristóbal-Hornillos, D., et al

    Cenarro, A. J., Moles, M., Cristóbal-Hornillos, D., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A176

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    P., et al

    Chiti, A., Frebel, A., Ji, A. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 857, 74

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Cohen, J. G. & Huang, W. 2010, ApJ, 719, 931

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    S., Yong, D., et al

    Cordoni, G., Da Costa, G. S., Yong, D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 2539

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    2009, ApJ, 696, 797

    Cristallo, S., Straniero, O., Gallino, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 797

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    T., & Aringer, B

    Cristallo, S., Straniero, O., Lederer, M. T., & Aringer, B. 2007, ApJ, 667, 489

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    2012, Research in Astron- omy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197 Da Costa, G

    Cui, X.-Q., Zhao, Y.-H., Chu, Y.-Q., et al. 2012, Research in Astron- omy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197 Da Costa, G. S., Bessell, M. S., Mackey, A. D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 5900

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    C., Abrams, D

    Dalton, G., Trager, S. C., Abrams, D. C., et al. 2012, Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, WEAVE: the next generation wide-field spectroscopy facility for the William Herschel Telescope, 84460P

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 5195 de Brito Silva, D., Jofré, P., Tissera, P

    Das, P., Hawkins, K., & Jofré, P. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 5195 de Brito Silva, D., Jofré, P., Tissera, P. B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 154 Di Matteo, P., Spite, M., Haywood, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A115 Article number, page 19 of 21 A&A proofs: manuscript no. loki

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    L., Gil-Pons, P., Lau, H

    Doherty, C. L., Gil-Pons, P., Lau, H. H. B., Lattanzio, J. C., & Siess, L. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 195

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    A., Sestito, F., et al

    Dovgal, A., Venn, K. A., Sestito, F., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 7810

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    2020, ApJ, 888, 91

    Ebinger, K., Curtis, S., Ghosh, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 888, 91

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, 652

    El-Badry, K., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Wetzel, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 652

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Feltzing, S., Eriksson, K., Kleyna, J., & Wilkinson, M. I. 2009, A&A, 508, L1 Fernández-Alvar, E., Carigi, L., Schuster, W. J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 852, 50 Fernández-Alvar, E., Kordopatis, G., Hill, V., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A151 Fernández-Alvar, E., Kordopatis, G., Hill, V., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 1509 François, P., Monaco, L., Bonifacio, P., et al. 201...

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    E., Gilmore, G., & Wyse, R

    Frebel, A., Norris, J. E., Gilmore, G., & Wyse, R. F. G. 2016, ApJ, 826, 110

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    D., Geha, M., & Willman, B

    Frebel, A., Simon, J. D., Geha, M., & Willman, B. 2010, ApJ, 708, 560

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    D., & Kirby, E

    Frebel, A., Simon, J. D., & Kirby, E. N. 2014, ApJ, 786, 74

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    & Bland-Hawthorn, J

    Freeman, K. & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 487 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    work page 2002

  51. [51]

    A., Daflon, S., Placco, V

    Galarza, C. A., Daflon, S., Placco, V. M., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A35

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    E., Monaco, L., et al

    Gilmore, G., Norris, J. E., Monaco, L., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 61 González Hernández, J. I. & Bonifacio, P. 2009, A&A, 497, 497 González Rivera de La Vernhe, I., Hill, V., Kordopatis, G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.05728

    work page arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    2008, A&A, 486, 951

    Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 951

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    J., El-Souri, M., Monaco, L., et al

    Hansen, C. J., El-Souri, M., Monaco, L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 83

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    T., Simon, J

    Hansen, T. T., Simon, J. D., Marshall, J. L., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, 44

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    2015, MNRAS, 453, 758

    Hawkins, K., Jofré, P., Masseron, T., & Gilmore, G. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 758

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    & Woosley, S

    Heger, A. & Woosley, S. E. 2010, ApJ, 724, 341

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 205

    Helmi, A. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 205

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    H., et al

    Helmi, A., Babusiaux, C., Koppelman, H. H., et al. 2018, Nature, 563, 85

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    2019, A&A, 626, A15

    Hill, V., Skúladóttir, Á., Tolstoy, E., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A15

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    C., Lee, Y

    Hong, J., Beers, T. C., Lee, Y. S., et al. 2024, ApJS, 273, 12

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    F., Wetzel, A., Kereš, D., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Wetzel, A., Kereš, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 800

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    P., Mackereth, J

    Horta, D., Schiavon, R. P., Mackereth, J. T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1385

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    P., Mackereth, J

    Horta, D., Schiavon, R. P., Mackereth, J. T., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5671

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    M., Asplund, M., Casey, A

    Howes, L. M., Asplund, M., Casey, A. R., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 4241

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    M., Asplund, M., Keller, S

    Howes, L. M., Asplund, M., Keller, S. C., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 884

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    M., Casey, A

    Howes, L. M., Casey, A. R., Asplund, M., et al. 2015, Nature, 527, 484

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    N., Aoki, W., Arimoto, N., & Okamoto, S

    Ishigaki, M. N., Aoki, W., Arimoto, N., & Okamoto, S. 2014, A&A, 562, A146

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Ivanova, D. V. & Shimanski˘i, V. V. 2000, Astronomy Reports, 44, 376

    work page 2000

  70. [70]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 32 Jeřábková, T., Hasani Zonoozi, A., Kroupa, P., et al

    Jackson, H., Jofré, P., Yaxley, K., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 32 Jeřábková, T., Hasani Zonoozi, A., Kroupa, P., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A39

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    P., Simon, J

    Ji, A. P., Simon, J. D., Frebel, A., Venn, K. A., & Hansen, T. T. 2019, ApJ, 870, 83

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    C., Dalton, G

    Jin, S., Trager, S. C., Dalton, G. B., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 2688 Jofré, P., Das, P., Bertranpetit, J., & Foley, R. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1140 Jönsson, H., Holtzman, J. A., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 120

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Just, O., Bauswein, A., Ardevol Pulpillo, R., Goriely, S., & Janka, H. T. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 541

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Karakas, A. I. & Lugaro, M. 2016, ApJ, 825, 26

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    2021, MNRAS, 501, 5176

    Khoperskov, S., Haywood, M., Snaith, O., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 5176

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    Kirby, E. N. & Cohen, J. G. 2012, AJ, 144, 168

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    I., & Lugaro, M

    Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A. I., & Lugaro, M. 2020, ApJ, 900, 179

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    2013, A&A, 554, A5

    Koch, A., Feltzing, S., Adén, D., & Matteucci, F. 2013, A&A, 554, A5

    work page 2013

  79. [79]

    K., Zucker, D

    Koch, A., McWilliam, A., Grebel, E. K., Zucker, D. B., & Belokurov, V. 2008, ApJ, 688, L13

    work page 2008

  80. [80]

    W., & Thompson, I

    Koch, A., McWilliam, A., Preston, G. W., & Thompson, I. B. 2016, A&A, 587, A124

    work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.