Pith. sign in

REVIEW

RISC-V V Vector Extension (RVV) with reduced number of vector registers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.08396 v1 pith:NVV7GRGL submitted 2024-10-10 cs.AR

classification cs.AR
keywords vectorregistersextensionfilenumberreduceregistercore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

To reduce the area of RISC-V Vector extension (RVV) in small processors, the authors are considering one simple modification: reduce the number of registers in the vector register file. The standard 'V' extension requires 32 vector registers that we propose to reduce to 16 or 8 registers. Other features of RVV are still supported. Reducing the number of vector registers does not generate a completely new programming model: although the resulting core does not have binary code compatibility with standard RVV, compiling for it just requires parameterization of the vector register file size in the compiler. The reduced vector register file allows for still high utilization of vector RVV processor core. Many useful signal processing kernels require few registers, and become efficient at 1:4 chaining ratio.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools