pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.05871 · v1 · submitted 2024-11-07 · 📊 stat.AP · math.DS

A Pole-Based Approach to Interpret Electromechanical Impedance Measurements in Structural Health Monitoring

Sourabh Sangle , Sa'ed Alajlouni , Pablo A. Tarazaga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.AP math.DS
keywords electromechanical impedancestructural health monitoringvector fittingpole estimationdamage detectionmodal parametersrational approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Vector fitting estimates stable poles from electromechanical impedance data to link measurements directly to damage-induced modal shifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes applying vector fitting to electromechanical impedance measurements so that the underlying system poles can be extracted and tied to physical modal parameters such as natural frequencies. Shifts in these poles are then interpreted as evidence of structural damage. Traditional RMSD and XCORR metrics lack this direct physical connection, while VF is shown to outperform other rational approximation methods by remaining accurate at high frequencies, returning stable complex-conjugate pole pairs, and condensing key information. A reader would care because the resulting pole tracking supplies an interpretable, physics-based alternative for post-processing EMI data in structural health monitoring applications.

Core claim

Vector fitting is better suited for EMI-based structural health monitoring because it is more accurate at high frequency, estimates complex conjugate stable pole pairs close to the actual poles of the system, and can capture critical information missed by other approaches and present it in a condensed form, allowing shifts in natural frequencies to be attributed to changes in a structure undergoing damage.

What carries the argument

Vector fitting, a rational function approximation technique that estimates the poles of the underlying system from frequency-domain data.

If this is right

  • Shifts in the estimated natural frequencies can be directly attributed to structural changes caused by damage.
  • VF supplies a condensed representation that highlights the modal information most relevant to damage assessment.
  • The approach yields physically intuitive post-processing of high-frequency EMI data compared with statistical metrics.
  • Alternative rational fitting methods are shown to be less accurate or less stable for this monitoring task.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining VF pole estimates with finite-element models of candidate damage scenarios could enable more specific diagnosis of damage type and location.
  • The method's emphasis on stable poles may support repeated measurements over time to separate damage effects from slow environmental drifts.
  • Real-time implementation of VF on embedded sensors could turn raw EMI streams into automated alerts based on pole migration thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

Poles identified by vector fitting reliably match the physical modal parameters of the structure and their observed shifts can be attributed to damage rather than noise or environmental factors.

What would settle it

A controlled test on a structure with known damage where the VF-estimated pole shifts fail to match independently measured changes in natural frequencies, or where undamaged structures exhibit comparable pole shifts under varying temperature or noise conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.05871 by Pablo A. Tarazaga, Sa'ed Alajlouni, Sourabh Sangle.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Estimated modal parameters of two structures to identify changes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Recorded original EMI with VF approximation for pole order 10-34, (b) Original and VF approximated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Process flow for damage detection using Pole estimation via VF. Modal parameters ’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) 5-Dof simulated example for low-frequency ranges [100 - 450 Hz], (b) Analytical, VF and LSCF-estimated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The experimental setup used for recording an EMI measurement and Aluminum specimen with attached [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Original and approximated EMI measurements using VF and LSCF, over the entire range [940 Hz - 100 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Original and approximated EMI using VF and LSCF, over small sections: (a) 12.5 - 14 kHz, and (b) 76 - 86 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Original and approximated EMI using VF and LSCF, over smaller sections: (a) 77.5 - 79 kHz, and (b) 81 - 83 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Original and approximated EMI measurements using RKFIT, AAA, and VF, over the entire range [940 Hz - [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Poles estimated using RKFIT, AAA, and VF. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A schematics of the simulated crack beam with crack location (a) and crack length (b) by Albakri and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: SEM generated EMI measurements for Case I [Zoomed over 52 - 62 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) SEM generated EMI measurements over 30 - 100 kHz, (b) Standard-RMSD metric, and (c) Windowed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: VF estimated modal frequencies for Case I [52 - 62 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: SEM generated EMI measurements for Case II [Zoomed over 70 - 80 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (a) SEM generated EMI measurements over 30 - 100 kHz, (b) Standard-RMSD metric, and (c) Windowed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: VF estimated modal frequencies for Case II [70 - 80 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: SEM generated EMI measurements for Case III [Zoomed over 42 - 52 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: (a) SEM generated EMI measurements over 30 - 100 kHz, (b) Standard-RMSD metric, and (c) Windowed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: VF estimated modal frequencies for Case III [42 - 52 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: (a) SEM generated EMI measurements over 88 - 98 kHz, (b) Windowed-RMSD metric, and (c) VF estimated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: (a) Modal peaks adjacent to one another, (b) VF estimated modal frequencies, and (c) SEM generated EMI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: EMI measurements recorded via Keysight E4990A for Case V [Zoomed over 57 - 61 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: (a) SEM generated EMI measurements over 950 Hz - 100 kHz, (b) Standard-RMSD metric, and (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: VF estimated (a) modal frequencies and (b) damping ratios for Example V [57 - 61 KHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: EMI measurements recorded via Keysight E4990A for Case VI [Zoomed over 52 - 61 kHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: VF estimated (a) modal frequencies and (b) damping ratios for Case VI [52 - 61 KHz]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_27.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Over several decades, electromechanical impedance (EMI) measurements have been employed as a basis for structural health monitoring and damage detection. Traditionally, Root-mean-squared-deviation (RMSD) and Cross-correlation (XCORR) based metrics have been used to interpret EMI measurements for damage assessment. These tools, although helpful and widely used, were not designed with the idea to assess changes in EMI to underlying physical changes incurred by damage. The authors propose leveraging vector fitting (VF), a rational function approximation technique, to estimate the poles of the underlying system, and consequently, the modal parameters which have a physical connection to the underlying model of a system. Shifts in natural frequencies, as an effect of changes in the pole location, can be attributed to changes in a structure undergoing damage. With VF, tracking changes between measurements of damaged and pristine structures is physically more intuitive unlike when using traditional metrics, making it ideal for informed post-processing. Alternative methods to VF exist in the literature (e.g., Least Square Complex Frequency-domain (LSCF) estimation, adaptive Antoulas--Anderson (AAA), Rational Krylov Fitting (RKFIT)). The authors demonstrate that VF is better suited for EMI-based structural health monitoring for the following reasons: 1. VF is more accurate at high frequency, 2. VF estimates complex conjugate stable pole pairs, close to the actual poles of the system, and 3. VF can capture critical information missed by other approaches and present it in a condensed form. Thus, using the selected technique for interpreting high-frequency EMI measurements for structural health monitoring is proposed. A set of representative case studies is presented to show the benefits of VF for damage detection and diagnosis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that vector fitting (VF) provides a physically interpretable alternative to traditional RMSD/XCORR metrics for analyzing electromechanical impedance (EMI) data in structural health monitoring. By approximating the admittance with a rational function, VF estimates stable complex-conjugate poles that are asserted to correspond to the system's modal parameters; shifts in these poles (hence natural frequencies) can then be directly attributed to damage. The authors argue VF outperforms LSCF, AAA, and RKFIT at high frequencies by producing more accurate, stable poles and condensing critical information, and they present case studies to illustrate the benefits for damage detection and diagnosis.

Significance. If the mapping from VF poles to uncoupled structural modes is established, the method would supply a more mechanistically grounded post-processing tool for high-frequency EMI-based SHM than purely statistical indices. The work applies an existing approximation technique to a practical monitoring problem and highlights its potential for intuitive tracking of physical changes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and case-studies section: the claim that 'case studies demonstrate benefits' and that VF is 'better suited' rests on qualitative assertions without reported quantitative metrics, error bars, or explicit criteria for superiority (e.g., pole-error norms or damage-classification accuracy).
  2. [Background on EMI] Background and method sections: the central claim that VF poles are 'close to the actual poles of the system' and that their shifts can be attributed to structural damage requires an explicit sensitivity or inversion analysis relating the coupled electromechanical admittance (PZT-structure interaction) to the uncoupled structural natural frequencies; the manuscript provides no such mapping.
  3. [Comparison with Alternatives] Comparison with alternatives: the statements that VF is 'more accurate at high frequency' and 'captures critical information missed by other approaches' are not supported by tabulated pole-location errors, stability metrics, or cross-validation against known modal parameters in the presented experiments.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Clarify the precise definition of 'actual poles of the system' (structural vs. coupled electromechanical) when first introduced.
  2. [Case Studies] Add a short table summarizing the number of poles retained, frequency range, and fitting residual for each method in the case studies.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript where the feedback identifies gaps in quantitative support or clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and case-studies section: the claim that 'case studies demonstrate benefits' and that VF is 'better suited' rests on qualitative assertions without reported quantitative metrics, error bars, or explicit criteria for superiority (e.g., pole-error norms or damage-classification accuracy).

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and case-study claims would benefit from quantitative backing. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit comparison criteria (e.g., magnitude and consistency of identified frequency shifts, pole-residue stability), include error norms for pole estimates against reference methods where feasible, and report variability from repeated measurements as error bars. These additions will make the superiority statements evidence-based rather than purely illustrative. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Background on EMI] Background and method sections: the central claim that VF poles are 'close to the actual poles of the system' and that their shifts can be attributed to structural damage requires an explicit sensitivity or inversion analysis relating the coupled electromechanical admittance (PZT-structure interaction) to the uncoupled structural natural frequencies; the manuscript provides no such mapping.

    Authors: The VF procedure is applied directly to the measured coupled admittance; the resulting poles therefore belong to the electromechanical system as observed. Damage-induced changes in the structure alter this coupled response, and the observed pole shifts serve as practical indicators. We will revise the background and method sections to state this distinction explicitly and to clarify that the method does not claim to recover uncoupled structural modes. A full analytical sensitivity mapping lies outside the scope of the present applied study. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Comparison with Alternatives] Comparison with alternatives: the statements that VF is 'more accurate at high frequency' and 'captures critical information missed by other approaches' are not supported by tabulated pole-location errors, stability metrics, or cross-validation against known modal parameters in the presented experiments.

    Authors: We will expand the comparison section with tabulated pole-location errors, stability indicators (e.g., condition numbers and residue norms), and any available cross-validation against reference modal data. These quantitative results will directly support the accuracy and information-capture claims at high frequencies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: VF applied as external approximant to measured EMI data with independent comparison to alternatives

full rationale

The paper applies vector fitting (an established external rational approximation method) to measured electromechanical impedance data to extract poles, then compares accuracy and stability against independent alternatives (LSCF, AAA, RKFIT) on the same data. No equation or claim reduces the asserted superiority or the physical attribution of pole shifts to a parameter fitted from the target result itself, nor to a self-citation chain. The motivation that pole shifts track damage is presented as interpretive motivation rather than a derived theorem. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not collapse by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard assumptions of rational function approximation and the physical meaning of poles in linear systems; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Vector fitting produces poles that correspond to the modal parameters of the underlying electromechanical system
    Invoked when stating that pole shifts can be attributed to structural damage

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5848 in / 1273 out tokens · 25388 ms · 2026-05-23T17:49:22.055808+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fit to print: New plant will assemble world’s first passenger jet engine with 3D printed fuel nozzles, next-Gen Materials, jun 2014

    General Electric. Fit to print: New plant will assemble world’s first passenger jet engine with 3D printed fuel nozzles, next-Gen Materials, jun 2014. URL https://www.ge.com/news/reports/fit-to-print

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Sarah Goehrke. Rolls-Royce to Get Largest-Ever 3D Printed Component Off the Ground, Flight-Testing Engine Later This Year - 3DPrint.com | The V oice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing, feb 2015. URL https: //3dprint.com/45820/rolls-royce-largest-3d-printed/

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    The Future of Exploration Starts With 3-D Printing, apr 2015

    Brooke Boen. The Future of Exploration Starts With 3-D Printing, apr 2015. URL http://www.nasa.gov/ exploration/systems/sls/j2x/3d_print.html. Publisher: Brian Dunbar

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Farrar, Graeme Manson, and Gyuhae Park

    Keith Worden, Charles R. Farrar, Graeme Manson, and Gyuhae Park. The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 463(2082): 1639–1664, 2007. Publisher: The Royal Society London

    work page 2082

  5. [5]

    Knowledge-based support in Non-Destructive Testing for health monitoring of aircraft structures

    Bernard Kamsu-Foguem. Knowledge-based support in Non-Destructive Testing for health monitoring of aircraft structures. Advanced engineering informatics, 26(4):859–869, 2012. Publisher: Elsevier

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Gyuhae Park, Hoon Sohn, Charles R Farrar, and Daniel J. Inman. Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance- Based Health Monitoring and Path Forward. The Shock and Vibration Digest , 35:451–463, may 2003. doi:10.1177/05831024030356001

    work page doi:10.1177/05831024030356001 2003

  7. [7]

    Venu G. M. Annamdas and Madhav A. Radhika. Electromechanical impedance of piezoelectric transducers for monitoring metallic and non-metallic structures: A review of wired, wireless and energy-harvesting methods.Jour- nal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 24(9):1021–1042, mar 2013. doi:10.1177/1045389x13481254. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/104...

    work page doi:10.1177/1045389x13481254 2013

  8. [8]

    Y . G. Xu and G. R. Liu. A Modified Electro-Mechanical Impedance Model of Piezoelectric Actuator-Sensors for Debonding Detection of Composite Patches. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 13(6):389– 396, jun 2002. doi:10.1177/104538902761696733. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/104538902761696733. Publisher: SAGE Publications

    work page doi:10.1177/104538902761696733 2002

  9. [9]

    Taylor, Kevin Farinholt, Mijin Choi, Hyomi Jeong, Jaekyeong Jang, Gyuhae Park, Jung-Ryul Lee, and Michael D

    Stuart G. Taylor, Kevin Farinholt, Mijin Choi, Hyomi Jeong, Jaekyeong Jang, Gyuhae Park, Jung-Ryul Lee, and Michael D. Todd. Incipient crack detection in a composite wind turbine rotor blade. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures , 25(5):613–620, nov 2013. doi:10.1177/1045389x13510788. URL https: //doi.org/10.1177/1045389x13510788. Publis...

    work page doi:10.1177/1045389x13510788 2013

  10. [10]

    Grisso, and Daniel J

    Corey Pitchford, Benjamin L. Grisso, and Daniel J. Inman. Impedance-based structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades. In Tribikram Kundu, editor, SPIE Proceedings, pages 508–518. SPIE, apr 2007. doi:10.1117/12.715800. URL https://doi.org/10.1117/12.715800

    work page doi:10.1117/12.715800 2007

  11. [11]

    Piezoelectric Wafer Embedded Active Sensors for Aging Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring

    Victor Giurgiutiu, Andrei Zagrai, and Jing Jing Bao. Piezoelectric Wafer Embedded Active Sensors for Aging Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring , 1(1):41–61, jul 2002. doi:10.1177/147592170200100104. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/147592170200100104. Publisher: SAGE Publications

    work page doi:10.1177/147592170200100104 2002

  12. [12]

    Application of electromechanical impedance technique for engineering structures: review and future issues

    Venu Gopal Madhav Annamdas and Chee Kiong Soh. Application of electromechanical impedance technique for engineering structures: review and future issues. Journal of Intelligent material systems and structures, 21(1): 41–59, 2010. Publisher: Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensor Structural Health Monitoring of Space Structures.Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 21(9):921–940, may 2010

    Andrei Zagrai, Derek Doyle, Vlasi Gigineishvili, Jacob Brown, Hugh Gardenier, and Brandon Arritt. Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensor Structural Health Monitoring of Space Structures.Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 21(9):921–940, may 2010. doi:10.1177/1045389x10369850. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1045389x10369850. Publisher: SAGE Pu...

    work page doi:10.1177/1045389x10369850 2010

  14. [14]

    Peairs, Pablo A

    Daniel M. Peairs, Pablo A. Tarazaga, and Daniel J. Inman. Frequency Range Selection for Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 129(6):701–709, dec 2007. ISSN 1048-9002. doi:10.1115/1.2775506

    work page doi:10.1115/1.2775506 2007

  15. [15]

    Albakri, Logan D

    Mohammad I. Albakri, Logan D. Sturm, Christopher B. Williams, and Pablo A. Tarazaga. Impedance-based non-destructive evaluation of additively manufactured parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23(3):589–601, apr 2017. ISSN 1355-2546. doi:10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0046. URL https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/ doi/10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0046/full/html . Publisher: Emerald

    work page doi:10.1108/rpj-03-2016-0046 2017

  16. [16]

    Sturm, Mohammed I

    Logan D. Sturm, Mohammed I. Albakri, Pablo A. Tarazaga, and Christopher B. Williams. In situ monitoring of material jetting additive manufacturing process via impedance based measurements. Additive Manufacturing, 28:456–463, aug 2019. ISSN 22148604. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.022. URL https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214860419300909. Publi...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.022 2019

  17. [17]

    Flexural Damage Evaluation in Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams Using a PZT-Based Health Monitoring System

    George Sapidis, Maria Naoum, Nikos Papadopoulos, and Maristella V outetaki. Flexural Damage Evaluation in Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams Using a PZT-Based Health Monitoring System. In Agnieszka J˛ edrzejewska, Fragkoulis Kanavaris, Miguel Azenha, Farid Benboudjema, and Dirk Schlicke, editors, International RILEM Conference on Synergising Expertise toward...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33211-1_86 2023

  18. [18]

    Naoum, Constantin E

    Maria C. Naoum, Constantin E. Chalioris, Chris G. Karayannis, Athanasios I. Karabinis, and Anaxago- ras Elenas. Electro-Mechanical Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring of Fiber-Reinforced Con- crete Specimens under Four-Point Repeated Loading. CivilEng, 4(3):856–880, sep 2023. ISSN 2673-4109. doi:10.3390/civileng4030047. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2...

    work page doi:10.3390/civileng4030047 2023

  19. [19]

    Albakri, Joseph Kubalak, Logan D

    Charles Tenney, Mohammad I. Albakri, Joseph Kubalak, Logan D. Sturm, Christopher B. Williams, and Pablo A. Tarazaga. Internal porosity detection in additively manufactured parts via electromechanical impedance measure- ments. In Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, volume 58257, page V001T08A009, 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Bilgunde and Leonard J

    Prathamesh N. Bilgunde and Leonard J. Bond. In-situ health monitoring of piezoelectric sensors using electrome- chanical impedance: A numerical perspective. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1949(1):230011, apr 2018. ISSN 0094-243X. doi:10.1063/1.5031658. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031658

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5031658 1949

  21. [21]

    Structural Health Monitoring Method for In Situ Inspection of Landing Gears

    Gökhan Haydarlar, Mesut Tekkalmaz, and Mehmet Alper Sofuo˘glu. Structural Health Monitoring Method for In Situ Inspection of Landing Gears. In Melih Cemal Ku¸ shan, Selim Gürgen, and Mehmet Alper Sofuo ˘glu, editors, Materials, Structures and Manufacturing for Aircraft, pages 211–238. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022. ISBN 978-3-030-91873-6. ...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91873-6_9 2022

  22. [22]

    Liang, F

    C. Liang, F. P. Sun, and C. A. Rogers. Coupled Electro-Mechanical Analysis of Adaptive Material Systems — Determination of the Actuator Power Consumption and System Energy Transfer. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 5(1):12–20, jan 1994. ISSN 1045-389X. doi:10.1177/1045389X9400500102

    work page doi:10.1177/1045389x9400500102 1994

  23. [23]

    Victor Giurgiutiu and Andrei N. Zagrai. Characterization of Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 11(12):959–976, dec 2000. doi:10.1106/a1hu-23jd-m5au-engw. URL https://doi.org/10.1106/a1hu-23jd-m5au-engw . Publisher: SAGE Publications

    work page doi:10.1106/a1hu-23jd-m5au-engw 2000

  24. [24]

    S. M. Strutner, C. Tenney, Pablo A. Tarazaga, Christopher B. Williams, and Andrew M. Kwas. Inexpensive Verification via Electromechanical Impedance for Additively Manufactured Parts. SAMPE Conference, 2018. URL https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10079245

    work page arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Chaudhry, C

    Fan Ping Sun, Z. Chaudhry, C. Liang, and C. A. Rogers. Truss structure integrity identification using PZT sensor- actuator. Journal of Intelligent material systems and structures, 6(1):134–139, 1995. Publisher: TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO., INC. 851 New Holland Ave., Box 3535, Lancaster, PA

    work page 1995

  26. [26]

    Three-Dimensional Electromechanical Impedance Model

    Venu Gopal Madhav Annamdas and Chee Kiong Soh. Three-Dimensional Electromechanical Impedance Model. I: Formulation of Directional Sum Impedance. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 20(1):53–62, jan 2007. ISSN 0893-1321. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:1(53). URL https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/ %28ASCE%290893-1321%282007%2920%3A1%2853%29. Publisher:...

    work page doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2007)20:1(53 2007

  27. [27]

    Three-Dimensional Electromechanical Impedance Model

    Venu Gopal Madhav Annamdas and Chee Kiong Soh. Three-Dimensional Electromechanical Impedance Model. II: Damage Analysis and PZT Characterization. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 20(1):63–71, jan 2007. ISSN 0893-1321. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:1(63). URL https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/ %28ASCE%290893-1321%282007%2920%3A1%2863%29. Publisher...

    work page doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2007)20:1(63 2007

  28. [28]

    Vibrational Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures

    Anders Rytter. Vibrational Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures . PhD thesis, Dept. of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, 1993. Backup Publisher: Aalborg University Issue: 44

    work page 1993

  29. [29]

    K. K.-H. Tseng and A. S. K. Naidu. Non-parametric damage detection and characterization using smart piezo- ceramic material. Smart Materials and Structures, 11(3):317, may 2002. ISSN 0964-1726. doi:10.1088/0964- 1726/11/3/301. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/11/3/301

    work page doi:10.1088/0964- 2002

  30. [30]

    Damage localization map using electromechanical impedance spectrums and inverse distance weighting interpolation: Experimental validation on thin composite structures

    Olivier Cherrier, Pierre Selva, Valérie Pommier-Budinger, Frédéric Lachaud, and Joseph Morlier. Damage localization map using electromechanical impedance spectrums and inverse distance weighting interpolation: Experimental validation on thin composite structures. Structural Health Monitoring , 12(4):311–324, 2013. doi:10.1177/1475921713493343. URL https:/...

    work page doi:10.1177/1475921713493343 2013

  31. [31]

    Damage location method for thin composites structures-application to an aircraft door

    Valérie Pommier-Budinger, Olivier Cherrier, Joseph Morlier, and Frederic Lachaud. Damage location method for thin composites structures-application to an aircraft door. In AST 2013 4th International Workshop on Aircraft System Technologies, page 0, 2013

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Effect of Temperature and Thermal Cycles on PZT Ceramic Performance in Fuel Injector Applications

    Sadegh Davoudi. Effect of Temperature and Thermal Cycles on PZT Ceramic Performance in Fuel Injector Applications. Thesis, University of Toronto, November 2012. URL https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/ handle/1807/33393. Accepted: 2012-11-21T20:21:09Z

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Quantification of temperature effect on impedance monitoring via PZT interface for prestressed tendon anchorage

    Thanh-Canh Huynh and Jeong-Tae Kim. Quantification of temperature effect on impedance monitoring via PZT interface for prestressed tendon anchorage. Smart Materials and Structures, 26(12):125004, October 2017. ISSN 0964-1726. doi:10.1088/1361-665X/aa931b. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa931b. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-665x/aa931b 2017

  34. [34]

    O’Gorman and A

    L. O’Gorman and A. Sanderson. The converging squares algorithm: An efficient multidimensional peak picking method. In ICASSP ’83. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing , vol- ume 8, pages 112–115, apr 1983. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.1983.1172227. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/1172227/?arnumber=1172227

    work page doi:10.1109/icassp.1983.1172227 1983

  35. [35]

    S. W. Doebling, C. R. Farrar, M. B. Prime, and D. W. Shevitz. Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review. Technical Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), may 1996. URL https://www.osti.gov/biblio/249299

    work page 1996

  36. [36]

    R. J. Allemang and D. L. Brown. A UNIFIED MATRIX POLYNOMIAL APPROACH TO MODAL IDENTIFICA- TION. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 211(3):301–322, apr 1998. ISSN 0022-460X. doi:10.1006/JSVI.1997.1321. Publisher: Academic Press

    work page doi:10.1006/jsvi.1997.1321 1998

  37. [37]

    Albakri and Pablo A

    Mohammad I. Albakri and Pablo A. Tarazaga. Dynamic analysis of a piezoelectric augmented beam system with adhesive bonding layer effects. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 28(2):178–194, 2017. Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Gustavsen and A

    B. Gustavsen and A. Semlyen. Rational approximation of frequency domain responses by vector fitting. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 14(3):1052–1061, 1999. doi:10.1109/61.772353

    work page doi:10.1109/61.772353 1999

  39. [39]

    Gustavsen

    B. Gustavsen. Improving the pole relocating properties of vector fitting. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 21(3):1587–1592, 2006. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2005.860281

    work page doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2005.860281 2006

  40. [40]

    Macromodeling of Multiport Systems Using a Fast Implementation of the Vector Fitting Method

    Dirk Deschrijver, Michal Mrozowski, Tom Dhaene, and Daniel De Zutter. Macromodeling of Multiport Systems Using a Fast Implementation of the Vector Fitting Method. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 18(6):383–385, 2008. doi:10.1109/LMWC.2008.922585

    work page doi:10.1109/lmwc.2008.922585 2008

  41. [41]

    Van der Auweraer and B

    H. Van der Auweraer and B. Peeters. Discriminating physical poles from mathematical poles in high order systems: use and automation of the stabilization diagram. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510), volume 3, pages 2193–2198 V ol.3, may

    work page

  42. [42]

    URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1351525

    doi:10.1109/IMTC.2004.1351525. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1351525. ISSN: 1091-5281

    work page doi:10.1109/imtc.2004.1351525 2004

  43. [43]

    Guillaume, and S

    Van der Auweraer, P. Guillaume, and S. Vanlanduit. Application of a fast-stabilizing frequency domain parameter estimation method. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME, 123(4): 651–658, 2001. ISSN 15289028. doi:10.1115/1.1410369

    work page doi:10.1115/1.1410369 2001

  44. [44]

    The RKFIT Algorithm for Nonlinear Rational Approximation

    Mario Berljafa and Stefan Güttel. The RKFIT Algorithm for Nonlinear Rational Approximation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 39(5):A2049–A2071, 2017. doi:10.1137/15M1025426

    work page doi:10.1137/15m1025426 2017

  45. [45]

    Trefethen

    Yuji Nakatsukasa, Olivier Sète, and Lloyd N. Trefethen. The AAA Algorithm for Rational Approximation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 40(3):A1494–A1522, 2018. doi:10.1137/16M1106122. 29 A Pole-Based Approach to Interpret EMI in SHM A PREPRINT

    work page doi:10.1137/16m1106122 2018

  46. [46]

    Wave propagation in structures: an FFT-based spectral analysis methodology

    James F Doyle. Wave propagation in structures: an FFT-based spectral analysis methodology. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Monitoring damage propagation using pzt impedance transducers

    Yaowen Yang, Hui Liu, Venu Gopal Madhav Annamdas, and Chee Kiong Soh. Monitoring damage propagation using pzt impedance transducers. Smart Materials and Structures, 18(4):045003, March 2009. ISSN 0964-1726. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/18/4/045003

    work page doi:10.1088/0964-1726/18/4/045003 2009

  48. [48]

    Quantification of damage sensitivity by electromechanical impedance signatures

    SK Singh and PH Malinowski. Quantification of damage sensitivity by electromechanical impedance signatures. In Proc. 7th Asia Pacific Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 2018. 30 A Pole-Based Approach to Interpret EMI in SHM A PREPRINT Appendix Table 3: Analytical, LSCF estimated and VF estimated for 5 DoF system (Undamaged) Undamaged Analytical LSC...

    work page 2018