Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Revisiting rotationally excited CH at radio wavelengths: A case study towards W51

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read First interferometric detection of the 700 MHz CH lines shows they trace dense gas.

desk verdict First interferometric shot at the 700 MHz CH lines with new electron-CH rates, but the dense-gas claim sits on sub-3.2-sigma features and one questionable fit. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08193 v1 pith:OTZUE2CX submitted 2024-11-12 astro-ph.GA

Arshia M. Jacob , Meera Nandakumar , Nirupam Roy , Karl M. Menten , David A. Neufeld , Alexandre Faure , Maitraiyee Tiwari , Thushara G. S. Pillai
show 2 more authors
Timothy Robishaw Carlos A. Duran
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords CHmoleculemethylidyne700MHzlinesnon-LTEradiativetransfermaserexcitationW51densemoleculargascollisionalratecoefficients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first interferometric detection of the rotationally excited lines of the CH molecule near 700 MHz, seen in absorption toward the star-forming region W51 E. By combining these lines with the ground-state 3.3 GHz lines and far-infrared rotational lines in non-LTE radiative transfer models, the authors argue that the 700 MHz lines trace dense gas (a few times $10^{5}$ $cm^{-3}$) where collisions dominate, whereas the well-known 3.3 GHz maser emission arises in lower-density gas pumped by infrared radiation and line overlap. If correct, this resolves a long-standing puzzle: the same molecule can maser in one velocity component and absorb in another depending on gas density.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a non-LTE radiative transfer code based on the coupled escape probability formalism, which solves the multi-level statistical equilibrium and includes effects of line overlap and an external radiation field. The models use hyperfine-resolved collisional rate coefficients for CH with atomic and molecular hydrogen, plus electron-CH rate coefficients derived in the Born approximation and presented in the paper, with line widths tied to the observed Gaussian components. The analysis hinges on line ratios R1 = T3.264 GHz / T3.349 GHz, R2 = T3.335 GHz / T3.349 GHz, and R3 = T701 MHz / T724 MHz, which are fitted across a density-temperature grid to determine the physical conditions and the population of the first excited state.

What would settle it

Integrate the 701 and 724 MHz spectra toward W51 E to a noise level well below the current rms and check whether the absorption features persist and match the fitted Gaussian components; if they vanish or shift to different velocities, the derived dense-gas excitation conditions are unsupported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the hyperfine-structure lines within the first rotationally excited state of CH (the 2Π3/2, N = 1, J = 3/2 state) near 700 MHz are excited only in high-density gas, with nH around a few times $10^{5}$ $cm^{-3}$, where collisional processes dominate the excitation and drive the lines into absorption. Toward W51 E the main lines at 701 and 724 MHz are detected in absorption at 3.1σ and 2.6σ, respectively, at velocities near 55 km/s, coincident with the dense star-forming clump, while the ground-state 3.3 GHz lines show anomalous (maser) emission at 65–67 km/s in lower-density gas with nH at or below 1800 $cm^{-3}$. The authors model both sets of lines simultaneously with a non-LTE radiative transfer code that includes line overlap, far-infrared pumping, and newly computed electron-CH collisional rate coefficients, and find that electron collisions do not significantly change the excitation scheme. This provides a consistent picture of CH excitation in which the 532/536 GHz lines connecting the first excited state to the ground state can also be modeled and used for column density determinations.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's conclusions rest on the weak 2.6–3.1 sigma absorption signals at 701 and 724 MHz being real CH absorption at the fitted velocities; if those signals are noise or belong to other gas, the dense-gas excitation scheme derived from them collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 700 MHz CH lines can serve as a density-selective probe of molecular gas, distinguishing dense clumps from diffuse foreground gas along a single sightline.
  • The ground-state CH maser at 3.3 GHz is quenched in dense gas, so its presence indicates low-density, FIR-pumped environments.
  • The new electron-CH collisional rate coefficients, although not decisive for this sightline, are now available for modeling other regions with high electron fractions.
  • Modeling the 700 MHz lines constrains the 532/536 GHz line emission and enables separation of emission and absorption in those spectra, improving CH column density measurements.
  • Higher rotationally excited CH lines (in the 4.8–7.3 GHz range) are predicted to remain undetectable, explaining past non-detections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to search for 700 MHz CH absorption toward other bright, compact continuum sources with known dense foreground gas, predicting that detections cluster at densities near 10^5 cm^-3.
  • The density dichotomy may be used to map the interface between diffuse and dense gas in star-forming complexes, since CH ground-state emission and 700 MHz absorption trace complementary phases.
  • The paper's conclusion that electron collisions do not thermalize the CH lines suggests that for similar hydride radicals with strong dipole moments, electron impact may be less important than assumed in photodissociation-region models, at least below electron fractions of about 10^-4.
  • If the Zeeman splitting of the 700 MHz lines could be measured toward W51 E with future instruments, it would probe magnetic fields specifically in the dense clump, a regime complementary to existing Zeeman probes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first interferometric search and detection of the 700 MHz hyperfine-structure transitions within the first rotationally excited state of CH (2Π3/2, N=1, J=3/2) toward W51 E, using uGMRT. The two main lines at 701 and 724 MHz are seen in absorption at 3.1σ and 2.6σ, respectively, and the satellite lines are not detected. The authors jointly model the ground-state 3.3 GHz lines and the 700 MHz excited-state lines with the non-LTE radiative transfer code MOLPOP-CEP, including line overlap and newly computed electron-CH collision rate coefficients in the Born approximation. From the line ratios R1, R2, and R3 (where R3 = T701/T724), they derive gas densities of a few × 10^5 cm^-3 for the 51, 57, and 61 km/s velocity components toward W51 E, and kinetic temperatures of 27–72 K. They further show that the ground-state inversion is quenched in these dense components except in the 3.264 GHz line, use the model to separate emission and absorption in the 532/536 GHz CH lines, and predict that higher rotational CH transitions are unlikely to be detectable. Non-detections toward five other targets are attributed to sensitivity and/or high densities.

Significance. If the detection and dense-gas interpretation hold, this is the first interferometric detection of the 700 MHz CH lines and provides an observational probe of density and excitation in the dense star-forming gas where the ground-state CH maser is quenched. The paper also contributes new electron-CH collision rate coefficients that will be useful for future modeling of CH excitation. The modeling strategy is sensible: it uses a well-benchmarked radiative transfer code, exploits line ratios to remove beam-filling dependence, and includes line-overlap effects that are essential for CH. However, the central observational claim rests on marginal detections (2.6–3.1σ), and there is an internal inconsistency in Table 3 that undermines one of the three components used for the density analysis. The dense-gas conclusion is therefore not yet sufficiently supported by the data as presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Table 3, 724 MHz row] For the 51.7 km/s component at 724 MHz, the fitted peak brightness temperature is negative (Peak TB = -28.5 ± 4.0 K) but the integrated intensity is positive (∫TB dV = +162.5 ± 32.2 K km/s). A negative-amplitude Gaussian must have a negative area, so this sign inconsistency implies either a typographical error or that the fitted component is not a simple absorption feature. Since the 51 km/s component enters the R3 ratio used to derive the density and temperature in Table 4 (Sect. 5.1, Fig. 8), the derived physical conditions for this component are not trustworthy until this discrepancy is resolved.
  2. [Sect. 4.1, Fig. 4, Table 4] The 700 MHz main lines are detected at 3.1σ and 2.6σ (Sect. 4.1), and the three Gaussian components at 51, 57, and 61 km/s in the 700 MHz spectra have positions and widths tied to the much stronger 3.3 GHz lines; the 700 MHz spectra do not independently resolve three components. Consequently, the R3 = T701/T724 ratios for each component used in the MOLPOP-CEP analysis (Sect. 5.1, Table 4, Fig. 8) inherit the assumed 3.3 GHz decomposition instead of being demonstrated in the 700 MHz band. If the 701/724 MHz features are noise or baseline artifacts, R3 is undefined and the derived nH ~ 10^5 cm^-3 collapses. The authors should provide a detection significance estimate that does not presuppose the 3.3 GHz decomposition (e.g., matched filtering or moment analysis at the known line positions) and show that the inferred densities are robust to alternative decompositions, such as a single broad component near 55 km/s.
  3. [Sect. 5.1, Table 4, Fig. 8] For the 61 km/s component, the reduced chi-squared of the model fit is less than 1, and the authors themselves describe the derived column density of the first excited state (N(CH) ~ 4.2 × 10^14 cm^-2) as 'questionable' because of underestimated uncertainties. This component is nevertheless included in the summary statement that the 700 MHz lines trace gas at nH ~ a few × 10^5 cm^-3 (Sect. 6). The dense-gas conclusion should be based on the robust 51 and 57 km/s components alone, or the 61 km/s component should be re-fit with a more careful treatment of systematic uncertainties before it is used to support the central claim.
  4. [Sect. 4.3 and Appendix C] The new electron-CH collision rate coefficients are computed in the Born approximation using the Einstein A coefficients, and the paper states that this is accurate for 'pure rotationally excited levels.' However, the 700 MHz HFS transitions within the Λ-doublet of the first excited state have Einstein A coefficients as small as ~2 × 10^-12 s^-1; the validity of applying the dipole Born formula to such weak, non-rotational transitions is not demonstrated. Since the electron contribution can be comparable to H2 collisions at the assumed electron fractions (xe = 1.5 × 10^-4 down to 3 × 10^-5, as described in Sect. 4.2), an error in these rates could propagate into the R3 predictions and the derived densities. The authors should justify the Born treatment for these transitions or provide an uncertainty estimate for the resulting rate coefficients.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sect. 4.3] The phrase 'in the following section and Appendix 4.3' should be 'in the following section and Appendix C'; the appendix is not numbered 4.3.
  2. [Sect. 2] There is a duplicated definite article in 'the the 560µm pump'; please correct.
  3. [Sect. 3 and Fig. 3 caption] The name 'Hershel' is misspelled in two places; it should be 'Herschel'.
  4. [Sect. 8 and Appendix A] The data availability statement reads 'Appendices A and B are available at' with no URL or pointer, and Appendix A contains an unresolved citation placeholder '( ?)' in the text about corner plots; both should be completed.
  5. [Table 4] The table header lists absolute values of the line ratios (|Ri|), but Sect. 5.1 defines R3 = T701/T724 without explicitly stating that absolute values are used; please clarify the sign convention in the text.
  6. [Fig. 9 caption] The caption describes 'model constrained brightness temperature (in red)' but the figure shows red, pink, and blue shaded regions representing emission, absorption, and the composite fit; please make the association between colors and components explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the line-ratio modeling is a standard radiative-transfer fit, the electron-CH rates are derived from an independent Born-approximation formula, and the Paper I self-citations are backed by external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a non-LTE radiative-transfer fit of observed line ratios (R1, R2, R3) to a density-temperature grid using MOLPOP-CEP. This is standard model fitting, not circular: the ratios are independent observed quantities, and model outputs such as excitation temperatures and column densities are used as consistency checks rather than as fit inputs that define the observables. The electron-CH collisional rate coefficients are derived from an independent analytic Born-approximation formalism (Appendix C, Eqs. C.1-C.4) using Einstein A coefficients and molecular constants; they are not constructed from the target line ratios. The paper relies on Paper I (Jacob et al. 2021b) for the choice of collisional rate combination and for benchmarking, but Paper I is an independent prior study benchmarked against TMC-1 and built on external collisional rates (Dagdigian 2018; Marinakis et al. 2019). The statement 'only this specific combination of collisional rate coefficients is capable of producing level inversion' is a modeling result from that prior work, not a uniqueness theorem imported to force the present conclusions. The low significance of the 700 MHz detections (3.1 sigma and 2.6 sigma) and the apparent sign inconsistency in the Table 3 integrated intensity for the 724 MHz 51.7 km/s component are data-quality and statistical-robustness concerns, not evidence of circular reasoning. The paper also explicitly acknowledges limitations, including uncertainty about the role of electron collisions and questionable high excited-state column densities for the 61 km/s component. No step in the derivation chain reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on a chain of modeling assumptions: the Born-approximation electron rates, the single-zone slab geometry, the adopted collisional rate combination, and external constraints on abundance and electron density. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Gas density nH for each fitted velocity component = log nH/cm^-3 = 5.32 (51), 5.02 (57), 5.3 (61), 3.25 (65), 2.49 (67)
    Fitted by chi2 minimization of observed line ratios R1, R2, R3 across a 93x93 grid in MOLPOP-CEP; these densities are central to the conclusion that the 700 MHz lines trace dense gas.
  • Kinetic temperature Tkin for each fitted velocity component = 63 K (51), 72 K (57), 27 K (61), >=178 K (65), >=172 K (67)
    Jointly fitted with nH; only 1 sigma lower limits for the 65/67 km/s components due to multiple minima.
  • Column density of CH in the first excited state N(CH, 2Π3/2, J=3/2) = ~2e14 cm^-2 (range 0.35e14 - 5.57e14 in Fig. 8)
    Constrained by the R3 ratio (T701/T724) jointly with R1 and R2; the 61 km/s value of 4.2e14 cm^-2 is flagged as questionable by the authors.
  • Electron fraction xe = 1.5e-4 to 3.0e-5
    Assumed upper limits from C+ abundance and electron density of 3000 cm^-3 taken from W49 CRRL models (Roshi et al. 2006), applied to W51 E.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Born approximation for electron-CH inelastic collisions is valid for the transitions considered
    Section 4.3 and Appendix C; the rate coefficients assume long-range dipole interaction dominates and scale with the square of the dipole moment. The paper acknowledges that ro-vibrational excitation would require R-matrix calculations.
  • domain assumption Single-zone plane-parallel slab with uniform density and temperature
    Section 4.2; MOLPOP-CEP models assume uniform physical conditions across the slab, which is a simplification for the complex W51 E sightline.
  • domain assumption The specific combination of collisional rate coefficients (Dagdigian 2018 for H and ortho-H2, He-based scaled rates for para-H2) is the only one that produces ground-state inversion
    Section 4.2; if the para-H2 rates or the indirect collision treatment are inaccurate, the modeled densities and excitation temperatures would change.
  • domain assumption The CH column density is constrained by the 2006 GHz ground-state FIR lines, and the CH-H2 relationship of Sheffer et al. (2008) is used to estimate H2 column densities
    Section 4.2; these inputs set the absolute column density scale for the models.
  • domain assumption Electron density upper limit of 3000 cm^-3 from W49 CRRL PDR models applies to the W51 E sightline
    Section 4.2; the paper uses W49 as a proxy because PDR models of CRRL emission toward W51 E do not exist.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting rotationally excited CH at radio wavelengths: A case study towards W51." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OTZUE2CX

@misc{pith2026241108193,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting rotationally excited CH at radio wavelengths: A case study towards W51},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OTZUE2CX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08193}
}
read the original abstract

Ever since they were first detected in the interstellar medium, the radio wavelength (3.3 GHz) hyperfine-structure splitting transitions in the rotational ground state of CH have been observed to show anomalous excitation. Astonishingly, this behaviour has been uniformly observed towards a variety of different sources probing a wide range of physical conditions. While the observed level inversion can be explained globally by a pumping scheme involving collisions, a description of the extent of 'over-excitation' observed in individual sources requires the inclusion of radiative processes, involving transitions at higher rotational levels. Therefore, a complete description of the excitation mechanism in the CH ground state, observed towards individual sources entails observational constraints from the rotationally excited levels of CH and in particular that of its first rotationally excited state. Given the limited detections of these lines, the objective of this work is to characterise the physical and excitation properties of the rotationally excited lines of CH near 700 MHz, and investigate their influence on the pumping mechanisms of the ground-state lines of CH. This work presents the first interferometric search for the rotationally excited lines of CH near 700 MHz carried out using the uGMRT array and jointly models the physical and excitation conditions traced by lines from both the ground and first rotationally excited states of CH.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08193 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Lowest rotational energy levels of CH, where the rotational transitions relevant to this work are labelled and marked using arrows. Note that the Λ-doublet and HFS splitting level separations are not drawn to scale and that the transitions labelled by dashed arrows are not observed. a.) The inset zooms in on the ground and first rotationally excited levels, to show the sub-mm transitions connecting the two levels an… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Normalised spectrum of the HFS splitting of the sub-mm and FIR transitions of CH connecting the 2Π1/2, N = 2, J = 3/2 (top) and 2Π3/2, N = 1, J = 3/2 (bottom) rotational levels to the ground state. The line intensities of the HFS triplets are computed assuming optically thin conditions at LTE for a Doppler line width at a gas temperature of 50 K. The velocity scale is displayed relative to the strongest HFS componen… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the radio continuum data. From left-to-right the panels display contours of the background continuum emission at 700 MHz, 3.3 GHz, and 870 µm (in white), respectively, overlaid atop the 700 MHz continuum emission. Labelled and marked (in blue) are the positions of the main young cluster W51 M and the two young stellar objects W51 N and E, which harbour several high mass young stellar objects at different… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Baseline-subtracted spectra of the ground state (left), and first rotationally excited state (right) HFS lines of CH towards W51 E. The individual fits to different velocity components are displayed by dotted blue curves and highlighted by the blue shaded regions, whil…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top panel: Baseline-subtracted spectra of the CH transitions dis￾cussed in this work, displayed on brightness temperature scales. The spectra are offset and scaled for ease of viewing. The relative inten￾sities and positions of the HFS splitting lines corresponding to …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top row: Temperature-dependent rate coefficients for de-excitation transitions induced by collisions with electrons within Λ-doublet levels of the CH ground 2Π1/2, N = 1, J = 1/2 and rotationally excited 2Π3/2, N = 1, J = 3/2 states. The solid and dashed curves mark th…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: MOLPOP-CEP non-LTE radiative transfer modelling results for the W51 E cloud components at υLSR = 65 km s−1 (top) and 67 km s−1 (bottom), respectively. The red contours display the 1, 2, and 3 σ levels of the χ 2 distributions of the modelled line ratios that best repro…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: MOLPOP-CEP model constrained brightness temperature (in red) to the emission and absorption components observed in the N, J = 1, 3/2 → 1, 1/2 transitions of CH near 532 GHz (upper panel) and 536 GHz (lower panel), respectively, towards W51 E. The pink and blue shaded r…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Clockwise from the top-left: Modelled excitation temperatures of the 3.264 GHz (dark blue), 3.349 GHz (dark orange), and 3.335 GHz (red) ground-state lines of CH, alongside that of the 701 MHz (dashed black) and 724 MHz (dashed-dotted black) lines of the first excited…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Variations in the MOLPOP-CEP modelled excitation temperatures of the ground-state and first rotationally excited transitions of CH as a function of gas densities for fixed values of N(CH) = 1.2 × 1014 cm−2 , ∆υ = 5 km s−1 and Tkin = 75 K (left) and Tkin = 25 K (right)…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: SOFIA/4GREAT spectrum of the N, J = 1, 1/2 → 2, 3/2 tran￾sitions of CH at 536 GHz, observed towards DR21 Main where the velocity scale is set by the strongest HFS component. The positions and relative intensities of the HFS lines are also marked. to, at least in part,…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: MOLPOP-CEP model predictions for the excitation tempera￾ture (Tex) for the HFS-split rotationally excited transitions between the 2Π1/2, N = 2, J = 3/2 (top) and 2Π3/2, N = 2, J = 5/2 (bottom) near 7.3 GHz and 4.8 GHz, respectively. The inset panels expand on the Tex …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Lunar Farside Transients and Technology Telescope (LFT3) Mission

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Proposes a $150M-class lunar farside radio telescope (LFT3) to survey 0.1–2700 MHz in the RFI-pristine shielded zone before lunar-orbital interference closes the window.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Adams , W. S. 1941, , 93, 11

    1941

  2. [2]

    & Elitzur , M

    Asensio Ramos , A. & Elitzur , M. 2018, , 616, A131

    2018

  3. [3]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

  4. [4]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33

    2013

  5. [5]

    C., & Townes , C

    Bertojo , M., Cheung , A. C., & Townes , C. H. 1976, , 208, 914

    1976

  6. [6]

    1984, , 130, 380

    Bouloy , D., Nguyen-Q-Rieu , & Field , D. 1984, , 130, 380

    1984

  7. [7]

    1984, , 285, 312

    Bujarrabal , V., Salinas , F., & Gonzalo , I. 1984, , 285, 312

    1984

  8. [8]

    Burton , W. B. 1970, , 2, 291

    1970

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    2022, , 134, 114501

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501

    2022

  2. [10]

    & Walmsley , C

    Cesaroni , R. & Walmsley , C. M. 1991, , 241, 537

    1991

  3. [11]

    Crutcher , R. M. 2012, , 50, 29

    2012

  4. [12]

    Dagdigian , P. J. 2018, , 475, 5480

    2018

  5. [13]

    Dagdigian , P. J. 2023, , 518, 5976

    2023

  6. [14]

    2019, , 623, A25

    Damiani , F., Prisinzano , L., Micela , G., & Sciortino , S. 2019, , 623, A25

    2019

  7. [15]

    A., Evenson , K

    Davidson , S. A., Evenson , K. M., & Brown , J. M. 2001, , 546, 330

    2001

  8. [16]

    1937, , 49, 26

    Dunham , T., J. 1937, , 49, 26

    1937

  9. [17]

    A., Gusten , R., Risacher , C., et al

    Duran , C. A., Gusten , R., Risacher , C., et al. 2021, IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 11, 194

    2021

  10. [18]

    1977, , 218, 677

    Elitzur , M. 1977, , 218, 677

    1977

  11. [19]

    & Asensio Ramos , A

    Elitzur , M. & Asensio Ramos , A. 2006, , 365, 779

    2006

  12. [20]

    & de Jong , T

    Elitzur , M. & de Jong , T. 1978, , 67, 323

    1978

  13. [21]

    Federman , S. R. & Willson , R. F. 1982, , 260, 124

    1982

  14. [22]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306

    2013

  15. [23]

    2021, , 73, S172

    Fujita , S., Torii , K., Kuno , N., et al. 2021, , 73, S172

    2021

  16. [24]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1

    2018

  17. [25]

    L., & Bieging , J

    Genzel , R., Downes , D., Pauls , T., Wilson , T. L., & Bieging , J. 1979, , 73, 253

    1979

  18. [26]

    R., et al

    Gerin , M., de Luca , M., Goicoechea , J. R., et al. 2010, , 521, L16

    2010

  19. [27]

    R., et al

    Gerin , M., Ruaud , M., Goicoechea , J. R., et al. 2015, , 573, A30

    2015

  20. [28]

    2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1702.06627

    Ginsburg , A. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1702.06627

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    2015, , 573, A106

    Ginsburg , A., Bally , J., Battersby , C., et al. 2015, , 573, A106

    2015

  22. [30]

    Ginsburg , A., Goddi , C., Kruijssen , J. M. D., et al. 2017, , 842, 92

    2017

  23. [31]

    & Pauls , T

    Greve , A. & Pauls , T. 1980, , 82, 388

    1980

  24. [32]

    S., et al

    Gupta , Y., Ajithkumar , B., Kale , H. S., et al. 2017, Current Science, 113, 707

    2017

  25. [33]

    2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol

    Hallinan , G., Ravi , V., Weinreb , S., et al. 2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51, 255

    2019

  26. [34]

    M., Menten , K

    Jacob , A. M., Menten , K. M., Gong , Y., et al. 2021 a , , 647, A42

    2021

  27. [35]

    M., Menten , K

    Jacob , A. M., Menten , K. M., Wiesemeyer , H., et al. 2019, , 632, A60

    2019

  28. [36]

    M., Menten , K

    Jacob , A. M., Menten , K. M., Wiesemeyer , H., & Ortiz-Le \'o n , G. N. 2021 b , , 650, A133

    2021

  29. [37]

    V., Kaiser , R

    Kalenskii , S. V., Kaiser , R. I., Bergman , P., et al. 2022, , 932, 5

    2022

  30. [38]

    J., Alexander , M

    K os , J., Dagdigian , P. J., Alexander , M. H., Faure , A., & Lique , F. 2020, , 493, 3491

    2020

  31. [39]

    M., et al

    Koley , A., Roy , N., Menten , K. M., et al. 2021, , 501, 4825

    2021

  32. [40]

    S., Csengeri , T., et al

    K \"o nig , C., Urquhart , J. S., Csengeri , T., et al. 2017, , 599, A139

    2017

  33. [41]

    Litvak , M. M. 1969, Science, 165, 855

    1969

  34. [42]

    2022, , 516, 5964

    Loreau , J., Faure , A., & Lique , F. 2022, , 516, 5964

    2022

  35. [43]

    2019, , 629, A130

    Marinakis , S., Kalugina , Y., K os , J., & Lique , F. 2019, , 629, A130

    2019

  36. [44]

    E., Bell , M

    Matthews , H. E., Bell , M. B., Sears , T. J., Turner , B. E., & Rickard , L. J. 1986, , 161, 329

    1986

  37. [45]

    1940, , 52, 187

    McKellar , A. 1940, , 52, 187

    1940

  38. [46]

    u ller , H. S. P., Schl \

    M \"u ller , H. S. P., Schl \"o der , F., Stutzki , J., & Winnewisser , G. 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215

    2005

  39. [47]

    J., Menten , K

    Reid , M. J., Menten , K. M., Brunthaler , A., et al. 2019, , 885, 131

    2019

  40. [48]

    C., Snyder , L

    Remijan , A., Sutton , E. C., Snyder , L. E., et al. 2004, , 606, 917

    2004

  41. [49]

    2016, , 595, A34

    Risacher , C., G \"u sten , R., Stutzki , J., et al. 2016, , 595, A34

    2016

  42. [50]

    2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 110

    Robishaw , T., Green , J., Surcis , G., et al. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 110

    2015

  43. [51]

    & Bressert , E

    Robitaille , T. & Bressert , E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python

    2012

  44. [52]

    A., De Pree , C

    Roshi , D. A., De Pree , C. G., Goss , W. M., & Anantharamaiah , K. R. 2006, , 644, 279

    2006

  45. [53]

    Rydbeck , O. E. H., Elld \'e r , J., & Irvine , W. M. 1973, , 246, 466

    1973

  46. [54]

    Rydbeck , O. E. H., Kollberg , E., Hjalmarson , A., et al. 1976, , 31, 333

    1976

  47. [55]

    Rygl , K. L. J., Brunthaler , A., Sanna , A., et al. 2012, , 539, A79

    2012

  48. [56]

    J., Brunthaler , A., & Menten , K

    Sato , M., Reid , M. J., Brunthaler , A., & Menten , K. M. 2010, , 720, 1055

    2010

  49. [57]

    M., Contreras , Y., et al

    Schuller , F., Menten , K. M., Contreras , Y., et al. 2009, , 504, 415

    2009

  50. [58]

    R., et al

    Sheffer , Y., Rogers , M., Federman , S. R., et al. 2008, , 687, 1075

    2008

  51. [59]

    J., Lauroesch , J

    Sofia , U. J., Lauroesch , J. T., Meyer , D. M., & Cartledge , S. I. B. 2004, , 605, 272

    2004

  52. [60]

    J., Lugten , J

    Stacey , G. J., Lugten , J. B., & Genzel , R. 1987, , 313, 859

    1987

  53. [61]

    & Neufeld , D

    Sternberg , A. & Neufeld , D. A. 1999, , 516, 371

    1999

  54. [62]

    Sume , A., Rydbeck , O. E. H., Kollberg , E., & Irvine , W. M. 1976, , 51, 155

    1976

  55. [63]

    & Rosenfeld , L

    Swings , P. & Rosenfeld , L. 1937, , 86, 483

    1937

  56. [64]

    1966, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 21, 507

    Takayanagi , K. 1966, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 21, 507

    1966

  57. [65]

    S., Araya , E

    Tan , W. S., Araya , E. D., Lee , L. E., et al. 2020, , 497, 1348

    2020

  58. [66]

    D., Green , J

    Tremblay , C. D., Green , J. A., Mader , S. L., Phillips , C. J., & Whiting , M. 2020, , 37, e055

    2020

  59. [67]

    Troland , T. H. & Heiles , C. 1977, , 214, 703

    1977

  60. [68]

    J., Hinds , E

    Truppe , S., Hendricks , R. J., Hinds , E. A., & Tarbutt , M. R. 2014, , 780, 71

    2014

  61. [69]

    J., Tokunaga , S

    Truppe , S., Hendricks , R. J., Tokunaga , S. K., et al. 2013, Nature Communications, 4, 2600

    2013

  62. [70]

    Turner , B. E. 1988, , 329, 425

    1988

  63. [71]

    Turner , B. E. & Zuckerman , B. 1974, , 187, L59

    1974

  64. [72]

    2019, in Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers, Vol

    Vanderlinde , K., Liu , A., Gaensler , B., et al. 2019, in Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers, Vol. 2020, 28

    2019

  65. [73]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  66. [74]

    Watson , J. K. G. 2001, , 555, 472

    2001

  67. [75]

    Wells , D. C. 1985, in Data Analysis in Astronomy, ed. V. di Gesu , L. Scarsi , P. Crane , J. H. Friedman , & S. Levialdi , 195

    1985

  68. [76]

    A., Beletsky , Y., & Kre owski , J

    Weselak , T., Galazutdinov , G. A., Beletsky , Y., & Kre owski , J. 2010, , 402, 1991

    2010

  69. [77]

    M., et al

    Wiesemeyer , H., G \"u sten , R., Menten , K. M., et al. 2018, , 612, A37

    2018

  70. [78]

    M., et al

    Winkel , B., Wiesemeyer , H., Menten , K. M., et al. 2017, , 600, A2

    2017

  71. [79]

    M., & Churchwell , E

    Winnberg , A., Walmsley , C. M., & Churchwell , E. 1978, , 66, 431

    1978

  72. [80]

    T., Becklin , E

    Young , E. T., Becklin , E. E., Marcum , P. M., et al. 2012, , 749, L17

    2012

  73. [81]

    M., Henkel , C., & Saykally , R

    Ziurys , L. M., Henkel , C., & Saykally , R. J. 1983, , 275, 175

    1983

  74. [82]

    Ziurys , L. M. & Turner , B. E. 1985, , 292, L25

    1985

  75. [83]

    & Turner , B

    Zuckerman , B. & Turner , B. E. 1975, , 197, 123

    1975

  76. [84]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  77. [85]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  78. [86]

    @esa (Ref

    \@ifclassloaded aguplus natbib The aguplus class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command natbib from the document \@ifclassloaded nlinproc natbib The nlinproc class already includes natbib cod...

  79. [87]

    @stdbsttrue NAT@ctr \@lbibitem[ NAT@ctr ] \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 [ @natanchorstart #2\@extra@b@citeb \@biblabel @num @natanchorend] @ifc...

  80. [88]

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifundefined NAT@sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifundefined bib@heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] 1 @ @ \@biblabel NAT@ctr \...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.