pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.13418 · v1 · submitted 2024-11-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Thermal Entropy, Density Disorder and Antiferromagnetism of Repulsive Fermions in 3D Optical Lattice

Yu-Feng Song , Youjin Deng , Yuan-Yao He This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords antiferromagnetismHubbard modeloptical latticethermal entropydensity disorderquantum Monte Carlodouble occupancy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Entropy increase with interaction strength and lattice density disorder quantitatively explain the experimental shift of peak antiferromagnetic order to U/t ≃ 11.75 instead of the theoretical 8.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the mismatch between a recent 3D fermionic Hubbard model experiment, where the antiferromagnetic structure factor peaks near U/t = 11.75, and prior theory that placed the maximum near U/t = 8. Using auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo, the authors compute an accurate entropy phase diagram for the half-filled model. This diagram permits simulation of experimental entropy paths across the temperature-interaction plane and direct incorporation of density disorder. The resulting calculations show that the observed shift arises from the combination of rising entropy during interaction ramps and the presence of density inhomogeneity in the optical lattice. The work further maps the entropy dependence of double occupancy and identifies universal features that could serve as experimental diagnostics.

Core claim

The discrepancy between the experimental AFM structure factor maximum at U/t ≃ 11.75 and the theoretical prediction at ≃ 8 can be quantitatively explained by the entropy increase as enhancing the interaction in experiment, and together by the lattice density disorder existing in the experimental setup.

What carries the argument

The entropy phase diagram computed via auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo simulations, which permits tracking of arbitrary entropy paths on the temperature-interaction plane while incorporating density disorder.

If this is right

  • The entropy dependence of double occupancy exhibits universal behaviors that can serve as independent probes in future optical-lattice experiments.
  • Including both entropy variation and density disorder brings the calculated antiferromagnetic structure factor into quantitative agreement with the measured data across the interaction range.
  • The same numerical framework can be used to predict how the critical entropy for antiferromagnetic order changes when experimental imperfections are reduced.
  • Double-occupancy measurements at fixed entropy provide a direct test of the interaction-driven entropy increase assumed in the analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experiments that actively cool the system while ramping interaction strength could move the observed peak closer to the ideal theoretical location.
  • Similar entropy-tracking methods could be applied to doped or anisotropic Hubbard models to forecast observable shifts caused by the same experimental imperfections.
  • The universal double-occupancy curves may allow entropy calibration without separate thermometry in future setups.

Load-bearing premise

The experimental entropy path on the temperature-interaction plane can be accurately tracked from the measured parameters and that the modeled density disorder faithfully represents the dominant imperfection in the real apparatus.

What would settle it

If the peak position remains at U/t ≃ 11.75 in simulations that hold entropy fixed while ramping U or that set density disorder to zero, the proposed explanation would fail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13418 by Youjin Deng, Yuan-Yao He, Yu-Feng Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Entropy phase diagram of repulsive 3D Hubbard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerical results of (a) AFM structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Double occupancy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The heat map of AFM structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Critical scaling of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The celebrated antiferromagnetic phase transition was realized in a most recent optical lattice experiment for 3D fermionic Hubbard model [Shao {\it et al}., Nature {\bf 632}, 267 (2024)]. Despite the great achievement, it was observed that the AFM structure factor (and also the critical entropy) reaches the maximum around the interaction strength $U/t\simeq 11.75$, which is significantly larger than the theoretical prediction as $U/t\simeq 8$. Here we resolve this discrepancy by studying the interplay between the thermal entropy, density disorder and antiferromagnetism of half-filled 3D Hubbard model with numerically exact auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo simulations. We have achieved accurate entropy phase diagram, which allows us to simulate arbitrary entropy path on the temperature-interaction plane and to track the experimental parameters. We then find that above discrepancy can be quantitatively explained by the {\it entropy increase} as enhancing the interaction in experiment, and together by the lattice {\it density disorder} existing in the experimental setup. We furthermore investigate the entropy dependence of double occupancy, and predict its universal behaviors which can be used as useful probes in future optical lattice experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) simulations, which are sign-problem free at half filling, to compute entropy phase diagrams for the 3D repulsive Hubbard model. It claims that following the experimental entropy path on the T-U plane together with a static density-disorder model quantitatively shifts the AFM structure-factor maximum from the clean-theory value U/t ≃ 8 to the experimental value ≃ 11.75, thereby resolving the discrepancy reported in Shao et al. (Nature 632, 267, 2024). The work also examines the entropy dependence of double occupancy and predicts universal behaviors as experimental probes.

Significance. If the numerical results are converged and the disorder model faithfully captures the dominant experimental imperfection, the manuscript supplies a concrete, parameter-free explanation for an important mismatch between theory and the first optical-lattice realization of 3D antiferromagnetism. The ability to simulate arbitrary entropy paths via thermodynamic integration is a technical strength that directly enables the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [results on entropy phase diagram] Entropy phase diagram and experimental-path tracking (results section on entropy surfaces): the abstract asserts that the experimental entropy path can be accurately tracked from measured parameters and that this, combined with disorder, quantitatively accounts for the shift from U/t ≃ 8 to ≃ 11.75. No explicit mapping procedure, sensitivity analysis to small changes in the path, or comparison of simulated versus measured entropy values is described; without these the quantitative attribution remains unverified.
  2. [density disorder modeling] Density-disorder implementation (section introducing the disorder model): the static density inhomogeneity is introduced to close the remaining gap after the entropy effect. The manuscript must demonstrate that the chosen disorder distribution is derived from the experimental apparatus rather than adjusted post hoc; otherwise the claim that the two effects together provide a quantitative explanation is weakened.
  3. [AFQMC results] Numerical convergence and error control (throughout the AFQMC results): the central claim is a precise numerical shift of the structure-factor peak. The provided abstract and summary contain no error bars, finite-size extrapolations, or Trotter-step convergence checks on the structure factor or entropy; these are load-bearing for asserting that the modeled effects move the peak exactly to the experimental location.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states 'accurate entropy phase diagram' without quantifying accuracy; a brief statement of the largest system size and statistical error would improve clarity.
  2. [figures] Figure captions should explicitly state whether the plotted structure factor includes the disorder average or is for the clean system.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments identify areas where additional documentation and verification will strengthen the quantitative claims. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications and data in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [results on entropy phase diagram] Entropy phase diagram and experimental-path tracking (results section on entropy surfaces): the abstract asserts that the experimental entropy path can be accurately tracked from measured parameters and that this, combined with disorder, quantitatively accounts for the shift from U/t ≃ 8 to ≃ 11.75. No explicit mapping procedure, sensitivity analysis to small changes in the path, or comparison of simulated versus measured entropy values is described; without these the quantitative attribution remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the mapping procedure requires explicit documentation to allow independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection detailing the thermodynamic integration used to obtain the entropy surfaces, the precise procedure for mapping the experimental parameters (temperature, interaction, and entropy) onto the T-U plane, a sensitivity analysis under small variations of the path, and direct numerical comparisons between the simulated entropies and the values reported or inferred in Shao et al. These additions will make the quantitative tracking fully transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [density disorder modeling] Density-disorder implementation (section introducing the disorder model): the static density inhomogeneity is introduced to close the remaining gap after the entropy effect. The manuscript must demonstrate that the chosen disorder distribution is derived from the experimental apparatus rather than adjusted post hoc; otherwise the claim that the two effects together provide a quantitative explanation is weakened.

    Authors: The disorder distribution is constructed from the trap parameters, atom number, and observed density inhomogeneity reported in the experimental work of Shao et al. We will revise the disorder-model section to include the explicit derivation steps, showing how the Gaussian or measured density profile is obtained directly from the experimental apparatus parameters without additional fitting. This will confirm that the model is parameter-free with respect to the experimental setup. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [AFQMC results] Numerical convergence and error control (throughout the AFQMC results): the central claim is a precise numerical shift of the structure-factor peak. The provided abstract and summary contain no error bars, finite-size extrapolations, or Trotter-step convergence checks on the structure factor or entropy; these are load-bearing for asserting that the modeled effects move the peak exactly to the experimental location.

    Authors: While the full manuscript contains internal convergence tests, we accept that these must be presented explicitly for the structure factor and entropy. The revised version will include statistical error bars on all reported quantities, finite-size extrapolations for the structure-factor peak position, and Trotter-step convergence data. These additions will substantiate that the reported shift to U/t ≃ 11.75 is numerically robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on AFQMC simulations (sign-problem free at half filling) that compute the entropy surface via standard thermodynamic integration, followed by a static density-disorder model to shift the AFM structure-factor peak. These steps are independent numerical procedures whose outputs are not defined in terms of the target experimental discrepancy; the entropy path is chosen to follow measured experimental parameters rather than being fitted to reproduce the U/t shift by construction. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling is load-bearing. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard half-filled 3D Hubbard model and the auxiliary-field QMC algorithm; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The half-filled 3D fermionic Hubbard model with on-site repulsion U and hopping t accurately captures the physics of the experimental optical lattice system.
    Invoked when mapping simulation results directly onto the experimental parameters and discrepancy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5750 in / 1273 out tokens · 46033 ms · 2026-05-23T17:01:47.600809+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, V. Ahufinger, B. Damski, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Ultracold atomic gases in op- tical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond, Advances in Physics 56, 243 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Hubbard and B

    J. Hubbard and B. H. Flowers, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 276, 238 (1963)

    work page 1963

  4. [4]

    Kanamori, Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of transition metals, Prog

    J. Kanamori, Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of transition metals, Prog. Theor. Phys 30, 275 (1963)

    work page 1963

  5. [5]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Effect of correlation on the ferromag- netism of transition metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 159 (1963)

    work page 1963

  6. [6]

    Esslinger, Fermi-hubbard physics with atoms in an op- tical lattice, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 1, 129 (2010)

    T. Esslinger, Fermi-hubbard physics with atoms in an op- tical lattice, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 1, 129 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Sch¨ afer, T

    F. Sch¨ afer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Tools for quantum simulation with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 411 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The hubbard model, Annual Review of Condensed Mat- ter Physics 13, 239 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    M. Qin, T. Sch¨ afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The hubbard model: A computational perspec- tive, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 275 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. E. Antipov, F. Becca, I. W. Bulik, G. K.-L. Chan, C.-M. Chung, Y. Deng, M. Ferrero, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jim´ enez-Hoyos, E. Kozik, X.-W. Liu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, M. Qin, G. E. Scuseria, H. Shi, B. V. Svistunov, L. F. Tocchio, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, S. Zhang, B.-X. Zheng, Z. Zhu, and E. Gull (Simons Collaboration on...

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Zheng, C.-M

    B.-X. Zheng, C.-M. Chung, P. Corboz, G. Ehlers, M.-P. Qin, R. M. Noack, H. Shi, S. R. White, S. Zhang, and G. K.-L. Chan, Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Science 358, 1155 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Xiao, Y.-Y

    B. Xiao, Y.-Y. He, A. Georges, and S. Zhang, Tem- perature dependence of spin and charge orders in the doped two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X13, 011007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Sewer, X

    A. Sewer, X. Zotos, and H. Beck, Quantum monte carlo study of the three-dimensional attractive hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 66, 140504 (2002)

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Paiva, R

    T. Paiva, R. Scalettar, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Fermions in 2d optical lattices: Temperature and entropy scales for observing antiferromagnetism and superfluid- ity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066406 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    R. A. Fontenele, N. C. Costa, R. R. dos Santos, and T. Paiva, Two-dimensional attractive hubbard model and 6 the bcs-bec crossover, Phys. Rev. B 105, 184502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Qin, C.-M

    M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Col- laboration on the Many-Electron Problem), Absence of superconductivity in the pure two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031016 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Xu, C.-M

    H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with par- tially filled stripes in the hubbard model, Science 384, eadh7691 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    M. Boll, T. A. Hilker, G. Salomon, A. Omran, J. Nespolo, L. Pollet, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Spin- and density- resolved microscopy of antiferromagnetic correlations in fermi-hubbard chains, Science 353, 1257 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    L. W. Cheuk, M. A. Nichols, K. R. Lawrence, M. Okan, H. Zhang, E. Khatami, N. Trivedi, T. Paiva, M. Rigol, and M. W. Zwierlein, Observation of spatial charge and spin correlations in the 2d fermi-hubbard model, Science 353, 1260 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Mazurenko, C

    A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kan´ asz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, A cold-atom fermi–hubbard antiferromagnet, Nature 545, 462 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Cocchi, L

    E. Cocchi, L. A. Miller, J. H. Drewes, C. F. Chan, D. Per- tot, F. Brennecke, and M. K¨ ohl, Measuring entropy and short-range correlations in the two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031025 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    M. Xu, L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, G. Ji, R. T. Scalettar, M. Lebrat, and M. Greiner, Frustration- and doping-induced magnetism in a fermi–hubbard simulator, Nature 620, 971 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    R. A. Hart, P. M. Duarte, T.-L. Yang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and R. G. Hulet, Observation of antiferromagnetic correla- tions in the hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature 519, 211 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Shao, Y.-X

    H.-J. Shao, Y.-X. Wang, D.-Z. Zhu, Y.-S. Zhu, H.-N. Sun, S.-Y. Chen, C. Zhang, Z.-J. Fan, Y. Deng, X.-C. Yao, Y.- A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Antiferromagnetic phase tran- sition in a 3d fermionic hubbard model, Nature 632, 267 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Niaz and A

    L. Niaz and A. Krasnok, Quantum leap: observing an- tiferromagnetic transition in a 3D fermionic hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Advanced Photonics 6, 060503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    J. L. Miller, A quintessential quantum simulator takes a 10 000-fold leap, Physics Today 77, 12 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Campostrini, M

    M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, Critical exponents and equation of state of the three-dimensional heisenberg universality class, Phys. Rev. B 65, 144520 (2002)

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    Staudt, M

    R. Staudt, M. Dzierzawa, and A. Muramatsu, Phase di- agram of the three-dimensional hubbard model at half filling, The European Physical Journal B 17, 411 (2000)

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    Paiva, Y

    T. Paiva, Y. L. Loh, M. Randeria, R. T. Scalettar, and N. Trivedi, Fermions in 3d optical lattices: Cooling proto- col to obtain antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 086401 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Paiva, E

    T. Paiva, E. Khatami, S. Yang, V. Rousseau, M. Jarrell, J. Moreno, R. G. Hulet, and R. T. Scalettar, Cooling atomic gases with disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 240402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Ibarra-Garc´ ıa-Padilla, R

    E. Ibarra-Garc´ ıa-Padilla, R. Mukherjee, R. G. Hulet, K. R. A. Hazzard, T. Paiva, and R. T. Scalettar, Ther- modynamics and magnetism in the two-dimensional to three-dimensional crossover of the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 102, 033340 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Sun and X

    F. Sun and X. Y. Xu, Boosting determinant quantum monte carlo with submatrix updates: Unveiling the phase diagram of the 3d hubbard model, arXiv: 2404.09989 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Y.-F. Song, Y. Deng, and Y.-Y. He, Extended metal- insulator crossover with strong antiferromagnetic spin correlation in half-filled 3d hubbard model, arXiv: 2404.08745 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Y.-F. Song, Y. Deng, and Y.-Y. He, Magnetic, thermody- namic and dynamical properties of the three-dimensional fermionic hubbard model: a comprehensive monte carlo study, arXiv: 2407.08603 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Khatami, Three-dimensional hubbard model in the thermodynamic limit, Phys

    E. Khatami, Three-dimensional hubbard model in the thermodynamic limit, Phys. Rev. B 94, 125114 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Werner, O

    F. Werner, O. Parcollet, A. Georges, and S. R. Hassan, Interaction-induced adiabatic cooling and antiferromag- netism of cold fermions in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 056401 (2005)

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    Dar´ e, L

    A.-M. Dar´ e, L. Raymond, G. Albinet, and A.-M. S. Trem- blay, Interaction-induced adiabatic cooling for antiferro- magnetism in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. B 76, 064402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    E. V. Gorelik, D. Rost, T. Paiva, R. Scalettar, A. Kl¨ umper, and N. Bl¨ umer, Universal probes for anti- ferromagnetic correlations and entropy in cold fermions on optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 85, 061602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    Imriˇ ska, M

    J. Imriˇ ska, M. Iazzi, L. Wang, E. Gull, D. Greif, T. Uehlinger, G. Jotzu, L. Tarruell, T. Esslinger, and M. Troyer, Thermodynamics and magnetic properties of the anisotropic 3d hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 115301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Rampon, F

    L. Rampon, F. ˇSimkovic, and M. Ferrero, Magnetic phase diagram of the three-dimensional doped hubbard model, arXiv: 2409.08848 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Kozik, E

    E. Kozik, E. Burovski, V. W. Scarola, and M. Troyer, N´ eel temperature and thermodynamics of the half-filled three-dimensional hubbard model by diagrammatic de- terminant monte carlo, Phys. Rev. B 87, 205102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Lenihan, A

    C. Lenihan, A. J. Kim, F. ˇSimkovic, and E. Kozik, Evaluating second-order phase transitions with diagram- matic monte carlo: N´ eel transition in the doped three- dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 107202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Garioud, F

    R. Garioud, F. ˇSimkovic, R. Rossi, G. Spada, T. Sch¨ afer, F. Werner, and M. Ferrero, Symmetry-broken perturba- tion theory to large orders in antiferromagnetic phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 246505 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    G. Li, A. E. Antipov, A. N. Rubtsov, S. Kirchner, and W. Hanke, Competing phases of the hubbard model on a triangular lattice: Insights from the entropy, Phys. Rev. B 89, 161118 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Wessel, Critical entropy of quantum heisenberg mag- nets on simple-cubic lattices, Phys

    S. Wessel, Critical entropy of quantum heisenberg mag- nets on simple-cubic lattices, Phys. Rev. B 81, 052405 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/xxx for supple- mental results of the full maps for AFM structure factor and double occupancy, and the critical scaling of AFM structure factor versus the entropy

    work page

  48. [48]

    Thermal Entropy, Density Disorder and Antiferromagnetism of Repulsive Fermions in 3D Optical Lattice

    Private communication with Xing-Can Yao. 7 Supplementary material for “Thermal Entropy, Density Disorder and Antiferromagnetism of Repulsive Fermions in 3D Optical Lattice” THE HEA T MAPS OF AFM STRUCTURE F ACTOR AND DOUBLE OCCUP ANCY In Fig. 5, we present the numerical results of the full maps of antiferromagnetic (AFM) structure factor Szz AFM and doubl...

    work page