Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Discrepancy in Oil Displacement Mechanisms at the Equivalent Interfacial Tensions: Differentiating Contributions from Surfactant and Nanoparticles on Interfacial Activities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.15424 v1 pith:KYVMY5QZ submitted 2024-11-23 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords interfacialnanofluidsdisplacementsurfactantsactivitiesmechanismstensionscapillary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study examines discrepancies in oil displacement mechanisms at equivalent interfacial tensions, focusing on the distinct contributions of surfactants and nanoparticles. It was hypothesized that similar interfacial activities would result in consistent displacement outcomes, while differences would reflect unique interfacial behaviors. Micromodel experiments revealed that at high interfacial tension (~20 mN/m), surfactants outperformed nanofluids in efficiency and ultimate oil recovery by reinforcing capillary forces. Conversely, nanofluids showed limited ability to modify interfacial forces. At lower interfacial tensions (6.5 mN/m for surfactants, 15.6 mN/m for nanofluids), both systems displayed similar displacement efficiencies and fingering patterns, driven by distinct mechanisms: capillary instability for surfactants and expansive layer flow for nanofluids. These findings challenge the assumption that nanofluids rely primarily on interfacial tension reduction for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and highlight the need to refine our understanding of nanoparticle interfacial activities. Future studies should extend these insights to core-scale experiments for a more comprehensive evaluation of two-phase flow dynamics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools