pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.17239 · v2 · submitted 2024-11-26 · 🧮 math.FA · math.PR

Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for generalised Cauchy measures

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.FA math.PR
keywords logarithmic Sobolev inequalitiesgeneralised Cauchy measurescurvature-dimension criterionconcentration inequalitiesfunctional inequalitiesone-dimensional case
0
0 comments X

The pith

Generalised Cauchy measures satisfy a curvature-dimension criterion yielding logarithmic Sobolev inequalities with optimal explicit constants.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a curvature-dimension criterion for generalised Cauchy measures. This criterion directly implies logarithmic Sobolev inequalities with explicit constants that are optimal in one dimension. From the inequalities, concentration results follow, which settle the case for dimension two where standard methods fail. A sympathetic reader would care because these inequalities provide tools for analyzing measures that arise in probability and analysis but resist conventional techniques.

Core claim

We prove a curvature-dimension criterion and obtain logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for generalised Cauchy measures with optimal weights and explicit constants. In the one-dimensional case, this constant is even optimal. From these inequalities, we derive concentration results, which allow concluding the case of the pathological dimension two.

What carries the argument

The curvature-dimension criterion, a condition on the measure that implies functional inequalities like the logarithmic Sobolev inequality.

Load-bearing premise

The generalised Cauchy measures satisfy the curvature-dimension criterion used to derive the inequalities.

What would settle it

A direct computation showing that the logarithmic Sobolev constant exceeds the claimed explicit value for some parameter choice in one dimension would falsify the optimality claim.

read the original abstract

We prove a curvature-dimension criterion and obtain logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for generalised Cauchy measures with optimal weights and explicit constants. In the one-dimensional case, this constant is even optimal. From these inequalities, we derive concentration results, which allow concluding the case of the pathological dimension two.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proves a curvature-dimension criterion for generalised Cauchy measures and derives logarithmic Sobolev inequalities with explicit constants and optimal weights. In one dimension the constant is claimed to be optimal. Concentration inequalities are obtained from the LSI and used to resolve the dimension-two case.

Significance. If the central claims hold without circularity, the explicit constants and optimality result in dimension one would be a useful addition to the literature on functional inequalities for heavy-tailed measures. The provision of a CD criterion that yields LSI is a standard and valuable approach when it is carried through rigorously.

major comments (2)
  1. [dimension-two case] The section establishing the LSI in dimension two: the argument derives concentration from the LSI and then invokes those concentration results to conclude the LSI itself in the pathological dimension-two case. This ordering must be shown to be non-circular; a self-contained derivation of the CD criterion or LSI in dimension two, independent of the derived concentration, is required for the claim to hold in all dimensions.
  2. [curvature-dimension criterion] The statement of the curvature-dimension criterion (presumably in the main theorem): the abstract asserts that the generalised Cauchy measures satisfy the CD condition with the stated weights, but no verification or parameter restrictions are indicated. The manuscript must confirm that the CD inequality holds for the full range of parameters without additional assumptions that would restrict the result.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract claims optimality in one dimension but supplies no comparison with known constants or explicit verification that the derived constant cannot be improved.
  2. [introduction] Notation for the generalised Cauchy density and the weight function should be introduced with a clear reference to the parameter range before the main theorems.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major points below and will revise the manuscript to resolve the concerns.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [dimension-two case] The section establishing the LSI in dimension two: the argument derives concentration from the LSI and then invokes those concentration results to conclude the LSI itself in the pathological dimension-two case. This ordering must be shown to be non-circular; a self-contained derivation of the CD criterion or LSI in dimension two, independent of the derived concentration, is required for the claim to hold in all dimensions.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern regarding potential circularity. The logical flow in the manuscript is: the CD criterion and LSI are first established in all dimensions except two via direct computation; concentration inequalities are then derived from those LSIs; finally the concentration is used to treat the remaining dimension-two case. To eliminate any ambiguity, we will revise the manuscript by adding an independent, self-contained derivation of the CD criterion (and hence the LSI) in dimension two that does not rely on the concentration results. This will make the argument non-circular and fully rigorous for every dimension. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [curvature-dimension criterion] The statement of the curvature-dimension criterion (presumably in the main theorem): the abstract asserts that the generalised Cauchy measures satisfy the CD condition with the stated weights, but no verification or parameter restrictions are indicated. The manuscript must confirm that the CD inequality holds for the full range of parameters without additional assumptions that would restrict the result.

    Authors: The verification of the CD inequality is carried out in the body of the paper by explicit computation of the Bakry-Émery curvature and the associated weights for the generalised Cauchy measures. We agree, however, that the abstract and the statement of the main theorem do not sufficiently highlight the parameter range or the absence of extra assumptions. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated remark immediately after the main theorem that explicitly confirms the CD inequality holds for the full range of parameters with no additional restrictions, including the key algebraic steps of the verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The abstract describes proving a CD criterion independently, obtaining LSI with explicit constants (optimal in 1D), then deriving concentration results from the LSI to handle the dim-2 case. No quoted equations or steps reduce the central claims (CD criterion or LSI constants) to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or prior self-citations by construction. The dim-2 handling uses consequences of the LSI but does not presuppose the LSI result itself in the proof of the criterion or inequalities. This matches the default expectation of no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No details on free parameters, axioms or invented entities are supplied in the abstract; ledger left empty pending full text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 985 out tokens · 18268 ms · 2026-05-23T17:35:42.198818+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C´ ecile An´ e, S´ ebastien Blach` ere, Djalil Chafa ¨ ı, Pierre Foug`eres, Ivan Gentil, Florent Malrieu, Cyril Roberto, and Gr´ egory Scheffer.Sur les in´ egalit´ es de Sobolev logarithmiques, volume 10 of Panor. Synth. Paris: Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France, 2000

  2. [2]

    Intertw inings and generalized Brascamp-Lieb inequalities

    Marc Arnaudon, Michel Bonnefont, and Ald´ eric Joulin. Intertw inings and generalized Brascamp-Lieb inequalities. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 34(3):1021–1054, 2018

  3. [3]

    Diffusions hypercontractives

    Dominique Bakry and Michel ´Emery. Diffusions hypercontractives. In S´ eminaire de prob- abilit´ es de Strasbourg XIX, volume 1123 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , pages 177–206. Springer, 1985

  4. [4]

    Analysis and geometry of Markov diffu- sion operators, volume 348 of Grundlehren Math

    Dominique Bakry, Ivan Gentil, and Michel Ledoux. Analysis and geometry of Markov diffu- sion operators, volume 348 of Grundlehren Math. Wiss. Cham: Springer, 2014. 15

  5. [5]

    Sobolev inequalities for proba bility measures on the real line

    Franck Barthe and Cyril Roberto. Sobolev inequalities for proba bility measures on the real line. Stud. Math. , 159(3):481–497, 2003

  6. [6]

    Concentration of measure o n product spaces with ap- plications to Markov processes

    Gordon Blower and Fran¸ cois Bolley. Concentration of measure o n product spaces with ap- plications to Markov processes. Stud. Math. , 175(1):47–72, 2006

  7. [7]

    Bobkov and Friedrich G¨ otze

    Sergey G. Bobkov and Friedrich G¨ otze. Exponential integrabilit y and transportation cost related to logarithmic Sobolev inequalities. J. Funct. Anal. , 163(1):1–28, 1999

  8. [8]

    Bobkov and Michel Ledoux

    Sergey G. Bobkov and Michel Ledoux. Weighted Poincar´ e-type inequalities for Cauchy and other convex measures. Ann. Probab., 37(2):403–427, 2009

  9. [9]

    Spectral gap f or spherically symmetric log-concave probability measures, and beyond

    Michel Bonnefont, Ald´ eric Joulin, and Yutao Ma. Spectral gap f or spherically symmetric log-concave probability measures, and beyond. J. Funct. Anal. , 270(7):2456–2482, 2016

  10. [10]

    Some remarks on w eighted logarithmic Sobolev inequality

    Patrick Cattiaux, Arnaud Guillin, and Liming Wu. Some remarks on w eighted logarithmic Sobolev inequality. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 60(6):1885–1904, 2011

  11. [11]

    On Poincar´ e and logarithmic S obolev inequalities for a class of singular Gibbs measures

    Djalil Chafa ¨ ı and Joseph Lehec. On Poincar´ e and logarithmic S obolev inequalities for a class of singular Gibbs measures. In Geometric aspects of functional analysis. Israel seminar (GAF A) 2017–2019. Volume 1, pages 219–246. Cham: Springer, 2020

  12. [12]

    Transportation c ost-information in- equalities and applications to random dynamical systems and diffusion s

    Hacen` e Djellout, Arnaud Guillin, and Liming Wu. Transportation c ost-information in- equalities and applications to random dynamical systems and diffusion s. Ann. Probab. , 32(3B):2702–2732, 2004

  13. [13]

    A family of Beckner inequalities u nder various curvature- dimension conditions

    Ivan Gentil and Simon Zugmeyer. A family of Beckner inequalities u nder various curvature- dimension conditions. Bernoulli, 27(2):751–771, 2021

  14. [14]

    Intertwining relations for diffusions in manifold s and applications to func- tional inequalities

    Baptiste Huguet. Intertwining relations for diffusions in manifold s and applications to func- tional inequalities. Stochastic Processes Appl., 145:1–28, 2022

  15. [15]

    Poincar´ e inequalities and integrated curvature-dimension criterion for gen- eralised Cauchy and convex measures

    Baptiste Huguet. Poincar´ e inequalities and integrated curvature-dimension criterion for gen- eralised Cauchy and convex measures. Bernoulli, 30(3):2207–2227, 2024

  16. [16]

    Concentration of measure and logarithmic Sobo lev inequalities

    Michel Ledoux. Concentration of measure and logarithmic Sobo lev inequalities. In S´ eminaire de probabilit´ es de Strasbourg XXXIII, volume 1709 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , pages 120–216. Springer, 1999

  17. [17]

    Bounding ¯d-distance by informational divergence: A method to prove measure concentration

    Katalin Marton. Bounding ¯d-distance by informational divergence: A method to prove measure concentration. Ann. Probab., 24(2):857–866, 1996

  18. [18]

    Dimensional variance inequalities of Brascam p-Lieb type and a local approach to dimensional Pr´ ekopa’s theorem

    Van Hoang Nguyen. Dimensional variance inequalities of Brascam p-Lieb type and a local approach to dimensional Pr´ ekopa’s theorem. J. Funct. Anal. , 266(2):931–955, 2014

  19. [19]

    Weighted Poincar´ e inequalities, concentration inequalities and tail bounds related to Stein kernels in dimension one

    Adrien Saumard. Weighted Poincar´ e inequalities, concentration inequalities and tail bounds related to Stein kernels in dimension one. Bernoulli, 25(4B):3978–4006, 2019. IRMAR (ENS Rennes), UMR CNRS 6625, Univ. Rennes, France Email address : baptiste.huguet@math.cnrs.fr URL: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-3387