pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.09060 · v1 · pith:N5XDJBHLnew · submitted 2024-12-12 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Sorting light's radial momentum and orbital angular momentum with a parabola-like lens

Yuan Li , Ye Xing , Wuhong Zhang , Lixiang Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords orbital angular momentumradial momentumparabola-like lenstransverse momentumoptical sortinglight multiplexingquantum states of light
0
0 comments X

The pith

A parabola-like lens maps light's orbital angular momentum and radial momentum to distinct positions along parabolas for separation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a parabola-like lens that redirects two components of light's transverse momentum—the orbital angular momentum describing twist and the radial momentum describing outward push—into separate locations within parabolic output patterns. This separation allows both quantities to be identified and sorted at the same time for single states and for their combinations. Efficient sorting of these momenta supports better use of light for carrying information because it completes the picture of sideways momentum in an optical field. Experiments show the lens performs the mapping for individual values and for superpositions, opening routes to optical multiplexing and quantum-state handling.

Core claim

The parabola-like lens transforms the orbital angular momentum and the radial momentum into different positions in the parabolas. We experimentally characterize the performance of our implementation by separating individual angular and radial momentum as well as the multiple superposition states. The reported scheme can achieve two kinds of transverse momentum identification and thus provide a possible way to complete the characterization of the full transverse momentum of an optical field. The proposed device can readily be used in multiplexing and demultiplexing of optical information, and in principle, achieve unit efficiency, and thus can be suitable for applications that involve quantum

What carries the argument

The parabola-like lens, an optical element that converts orbital angular momentum and radial momentum values into distinct spatial positions within parabolic intensity patterns.

If this is right

  • The lens enables simultaneous identification of orbital angular momentum and radial momentum in a light field.
  • It supplies a route to full characterization of transverse momentum for an optical beam.
  • The device supports multiplexing and demultiplexing of optical information.
  • It can reach unit efficiency in principle and applies to quantum states of light.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mapping principle could be adapted to sort additional transverse properties or applied in non-optical wave systems such as sound or matter waves.
  • Integration with existing beam-shaping optics might allow compact modules for continuous monitoring of light momentum in communication links.
  • Scaling the approach to more simultaneous states could increase the number of distinguishable channels in high-dimensional encoding schemes.

Load-bearing premise

The lens shape produces clean spatial separation of the two momenta for both single states and their superpositions without large overlap or loss.

What would settle it

An experiment that records overlapping output spots or high crosstalk for a known superposition of orbital angular momentum and radial momentum states would show the transformation does not separate them as claimed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09060 by Lixiang Chen, Wuhong Zhang, Ye Xing, Yuan Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Diagrammatic sketch of the parabola-like lens fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Experiment setup. L:lens, M: mirror, BS: beam split [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Single OAM and RM mode sorting with the parabola [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimental test of the resolution distribution fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The orbital angular momentum and radial momentum both describe the transverse momentum of a light field. Efficient discriminating and sorting the two kinds of momentum lies at the heart of further application. Here, we propose a parabola-like lens that can transform the orbital angular momentum and the radial momentum into different positions in the parabolas. We experimentally characterize the performance of our implementation by separating individual angular and radial momentum as well as the multiple superposition states. The reported scheme can achieve two kinds of transverse momentum identification and thus provide a possible way to complete the characterization of the full transverse momentum of an optical field. The proposed device can readily be used in multiplexing and demultiplexing of optical information, and in principle, achieve unit efficiency, and thus can be suitable for applications that involve quantum states of light.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a parabola-like lens that maps both the orbital angular momentum (OAM) and radial momentum components of an optical field to distinct transverse positions along parabolic trajectories in the focal plane. This enables simultaneous sorting of the two transverse-momentum degrees of freedom. The authors report an experimental implementation that separates both pure OAM/radial states and their superpositions, claiming high efficiency and low crosstalk, with the device operating in principle at unit efficiency for quantum-light applications such as multiplexing.

Significance. If the experimental mapping and separation performance are confirmed, the work supplies a compact, single-element solution for full transverse-momentum characterization of light. This is relevant to optical communication, quantum information processing, and high-dimensional state manipulation. The explicit experimental test on superpositions and the unit-efficiency claim are positive features that distinguish the approach from multi-element or diffractive alternatives.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Experimental characterization] Abstract and experimental section: the central claim of 'experimental characterization' of both pure states and multiple superposition states with 'high efficiency and low crosstalk' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides neither raw data, error bars, measured crosstalk values, nor a detailed methods description. Without these, the performance assertions cannot be verified.
  2. [Design / Theory] Theoretical design section: the mapping that converts OAM and radial momentum into distinct parabolic positions is asserted to be parameter-free and to achieve unit efficiency, but the explicit ray-transfer or wave-optics derivation (including the precise lens sagitta function and its action on the two momentum operators) is not shown. This derivation is required to substantiate the 'in principle unit efficiency' statement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Notation for the radial momentum coordinate should be defined once and used consistently; the current text alternates between p_r and k_r without explicit relation to the lens focal length.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the experimental separation results should include the measured efficiency and crosstalk percentages rather than qualitative statements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help improve the clarity and verifiability of our work. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Experimental characterization] Abstract and experimental section: the central claim of 'experimental characterization' of both pure states and multiple superposition states with 'high efficiency and low crosstalk' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides neither raw data, error bars, measured crosstalk values, nor a detailed methods description. Without these, the performance assertions cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that the experimental claims require more transparent supporting data for verification. In the revised manuscript we will expand the experimental section (or add a supplementary note) with raw intensity images or traces, quantitative error bars on efficiency and crosstalk, explicit measured crosstalk values for the reported states, and a detailed methods description covering the setup, alignment procedure, and data processing. These additions will directly substantiate the reported performance for both pure OAM/radial states and their superpositions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Design / Theory] Theoretical design section: the mapping that converts OAM and radial momentum into distinct parabolic positions is asserted to be parameter-free and to achieve unit efficiency, but the explicit ray-transfer or wave-optics derivation (including the precise lens sagitta function and its action on the two momentum operators) is not shown. This derivation is required to substantiate the 'in principle unit efficiency' statement.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit derivation is needed to support the parameter-free mapping and unit-efficiency claim. In the revised theoretical section we will insert the full derivation, starting from the lens sagitta function, proceeding through the ray-transfer matrix (or equivalently the Fresnel propagation integral), and showing how the phase profile acts on the azimuthal and radial momentum operators to produce the parabolic trajectories without free parameters. This will rigorously establish the ideal unit-efficiency limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper proposes a parabola-like lens design to map OAM and radial momentum to distinct spatial positions, supported by experimental characterization of separation performance for pure states and superpositions. No load-bearing derivation step reduces by construction to its own inputs, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatz choices. The central claim rests on the physical device proposal and empirical results, which are independent of the target identification performance.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only, no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed; the lens design itself constitutes the core proposal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5663 in / 890 out tokens · 17344 ms · 2026-05-23T07:33:19.526625+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    to realize the separation, see more in the SM. To simulate the propa- gation behavior of the beam after the lens, we consider the propagation equation as follows: E(ρ′, φ ′, z ′) = exp(ikz ′) iλz ′ e ikρ′2 2z′ ∫ +∞ 0 ∫ 2π 0 E(ρ, φ, z 1) T (ρ, φ )e ikρ2 2z′ e − ikρρ′cos(φ′− φ) z′ ρdρdφ, (3) where E(ρ, φ, z 1) is the input light field after propagation at a ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The SLM-A loads the desired hologram grating to produce the input light field as shown in Eq

    A 532nm laser is expanded by L1=50mm, L2=200mm and incident to spatial light modulator A (SLM-A). The SLM-A loads the desired hologram grating to produce the input light field as shown in Eq. ( 1). The phase mask of the hologram is shown in Fig. 2 (a). Then, the desired beam which contains both the OAM and the RM FIG. 3. Single OAM and RM mode sorting with...

    work page

  3. [3]

    and ( 4). Then we superpo- sition of all the captured single mode into one image, the same RM but different OAM are distributed on the same parabola but different RM are distributed in dif- ferent parabola, as the red parabola line clearly shows in 4 FIG. 4. Multiple OAM and RM modes superposition sorting effect with the parabola-like lens. Fig. 3 (b). To fu...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Richardson, J

    D. Richardson, J. Fini, and L. Nelson, Nat. Photonics 7, 354 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    G. Li, N. Bai, N. Zhao, and C. Xia, Adv. Opt. Photonics 6, 413 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Trichili, K.-H

    A. Trichili, K.-H. Park, M. Zghal, B. S. Ooi, and M.-S. Alouini, IEEE COMMUN SUR V TUT 21, 3175 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Wang, J.-Y

    J. Wang, J.-Y. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, et al. , Nat. Photonics 6, 488 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Bozinovic, Y

    N. Bozinovic, Y. Yue, Y. Ren, M. Tur, P. Kristensen, H. Huang, A. E. Willner, and S. Ramachandran, Science 340, 1545 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    A. E. Willner, H. Huang, Y. Yan, Y. Ren, N. Ahmed, G. Xie, C. Bao, L. Li, Y. Cao, Z. Zhao, et al. , Adv. Opt. Photonics 7, 66 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    L. Chen, T. Ma, X. Qiu, D. Zhang, W. Zhang, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 060403 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    T. Ma, D. Zhang, X. Qiu, Y. Chen, and L. Chen, Opt. Lett. 45, 5152 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Zhang, D

    Z. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Qiu, Y. Chen, S. Franke-Arnold, and L. Chen, Photonics Res. 10, 2223 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Leach, M

    J. Leach, M. J. Padgett, S. M. Barnett, S. Franke-Arnold , and J. Courtial, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    Leach, J

    J. Leach, J. Courtial, K. Skeldon, S. M. Barnett, S. Franke-Arnold, and M. J. Padgett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 013601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Zhang, Q

    W. Zhang, Q. Qi, J. Zhou, and L. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 153601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    G. C. Berkhout and M. W. Beijersbergen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 100801 (2008)

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Hickmann, E

    J. Hickmann, E. Fonseca, W. Soares, and S. Ch´ avez- Cerda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053904 (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    G. C. Berkhout, M. P. Lavery, J. Courtial, M. W. Bei- jersbergen, and M. J. Padgett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 153601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Mirhosseini, M

    M. Mirhosseini, M. Malik, Z. Shi, and R. W. Boyd, Nat. Commun. 4, 2781 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Y. Wen, I. Chremmos, Y. Chen, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and S. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 193904 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Z. Liu, S. Yan, H. Liu, and X. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 183902 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Dudley, T

    A. Dudley, T. Mhlanga, M. Lavery, A. McDonald, F. S. Roux, M. Padgett, and A. Forbes, Opt. Express 21, 165 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Trichili, T

    A. Trichili, T. Mhlanga, Y. Ismail, F. S. Roux, M. McLaren, M. Zghal, and A. Forbes, Opt. Express 22, 17553 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Fickler, M

    R. Fickler, M. Ginoya, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. B 95, 161108 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Fickler, F

    R. Fickler, F. Bouchard, E. Giese, V. Grillo, G. Leuchs, and E. Karimi, J. Opt. 22, 024001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    X. Gu, M. Krenn, M. Erhard, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 103601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Y. Zhou, M. Mirhosseini, D. Fu, J. Zhao, S. M. H. Raf- sanjani, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 263602 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    D. Fu, Y. Zhou, R. Qi, S. Oliver, Y. Wang, S. M. H. Rafsanjani, J. Zhao, M. Mirhosseini, Z. Shi, P. Zhang, et al. , Opt. Express 26, 33057 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    N. K. Fontaine, R. Ryf, H. Chen, D. T. Neilson, K. Kim, and J. Carpenter, Nat. Commun. 10, 1865 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    W. N. Plick and M. Krenn, Phys. Rev. A 92, 063841 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    R. Sahu, S. Chaudhary, K. Khare, M. Bhattacharya, H. Wanare, and A. K. Jha, Opt. Express 26, 8709 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    J. Zhou, H. Pu, and Q. Wang, Opt. Express 30, 9703 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Y. Lv, Z. Shang, S. Fu, L. Huang, L. Gao, and C. Gao, Opt. Lett. 47, 5032 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Y. Guo, S. Zhang, M. Pu, Q. He, J. Jin, M. Xu, Y. Zhang, P. Gao, and X. Luo, Light: Sci. Appl. 10, 63 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    B. Wang, L. Wu, Z. Lin, W. Zhong, Z. Zhu, and Y. Chen, Laser Photonics Rev. , 2400113 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Ahmed, H

    H. Ahmed, H. Kim, Y. Zhang, Y. Intaravanne, J. Jang, J. Rho, S. Chen, and X. Chen, Nanophotonics 11, 941 (2022). 6

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Cheng, X

    J. Cheng, X. Sha, H. Zhang, Q. Chen, G. Qu, Q. Song, S. Yu, and S. Xiao, Nano Lett. 22, 3993 (2022)

    work page 2022