pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.09592 · v1 · pith:33KO22QNnew · submitted 2024-12-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

JWST PRIMER: strong evidence for the environmental quenching of low-mass galaxies out to mathbf{textit{z} simeq 2}

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxiesquiescentlow-massquenchingfollowedhigh-masssize-massconsistent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present the results of a study investigating the galaxy stellar-mass function (GSMF), size-mass relations and morphological properties of star-forming and quiescent galaxies over the redshift range $0.25<z<2.25$, using the JWST PRIMER survey. The depth of the PRIMER near-IR imaging allows us to confirm the double Schechter function shape of the quiescent GSMF out to $z\simeq2.0$, via a clear detection of the upturn at $\mathrm{log}_{10}(M_{\star}/ M_{\odot}) \leq 10$ thought to be induced by environmental quenching. In addition to the GSMF, we confirm that quiescent galaxies can be split into separate populations at $\mathrm{log}_{10}(M_{\star}/M_{\odot}) \simeq 10$, based on their size-mass relations and morphologies. We find that low-mass quiescent galaxies have more disk-like morphologies (based on S\'ersic index, Gini coefficient and $M_{20}$ metrics) and follow a shallower size-mass relation than their high-mass counterparts. Indeed, the slope of the size-mass relation followed by low-mass quiescent galaxies is indistinguishable from that followed by star-forming galaxies, albeit with a lower normalization. Moreover, within the errors, the evolution in the median size of low-mass quiescent galaxies is indistinguishable from that followed by star-forming galaxies ($R_{e}\propto(1+z)^{-0.25\pm0.03})$, and significantly less rapid than that displayed by high-mass quiescent galaxies ($R_{e}\propto (1+z)^{-1.14\pm 0.03})$. Overall, our results are consistent with low and high-mass quiescent galaxies following different quenching pathways. The evolution of low-mass quiescent galaxies is qualitatively consistent with the expectations of external/environmental quenching (e.g. ram-pressure stripping). In contrast, the evolution of high-mass quiescent galaxies is consistent with internal/mass quenching (e.g. AGN feedback) followed by size growth driven by minor mergers.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Post-starburst Galaxy Undergoing Ram-pressure Stripping at Redshift 3.06

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    JWST and ALMA data provide the earliest direct evidence of ram-pressure stripping in a post-starburst galaxy at z=3.06, implying the process can quench star formation in nascent groups at z>3.

  2. A Post-starburst Galaxy Undergoing Ram-pressure Stripping at Redshift 3.06

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Earliest direct evidence of ram-pressure stripping quenching star formation in a galaxy at z=3.06.