Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Non-asymptotic Error Analysis of Subspace Identification for Deterministic Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.16761 v3 pith:64NLNX3I submitted 2024-12-21 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords identificationnon-asymptoticsimssystemsystemsanalysiserrorsmimo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The subspace identification method (SIM) has been extensively employed in the identification of discrete-time multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. This paper focuses on the analysis of perturbation errors for the system matrices in state-space models and the corresponding system poles, under two unified SIMs, based on a single finite-length input/output sample trajectory. Specifically, we derive non-asymptotic upper bounds on these errors, providing a unified perspective across various SIM variants. Furthermore, we prove that SIMs become ill-conditioned for MIMO systems when the state-to-output dimensionality ratio $n/m$ is large, regardless of system parameters. Finally, numerical experiments are conducted to validate the non-asymptotic results and the ill-conditionedness of SIMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Finite Sample Analysis of Subspace Identification for Stochastic Systems

    eess.SY 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Subspace identification is claimed to have O(1/sqrt N) finite-sample matrix errors, O(N^{-1/(2n)}) pole errors, and a super-polynomial sample complexity in n/m; the last claim is not proven.

Pith tools